This is not the (true) soldiery of Christ which rends asunder the sheepfold of the Redeemer. The Holy Church has reserved a soldiery for herself to help her people, but you debase her wickedly to her hurt.” In this way Pope Urban made sure that if anger did not move the men then shame would. It would have been no small thing to be told that the way one was leading a life was disgraceful to the church. This would have filled the men with a desire to atone for their misdeeds and to do it in the most prominent way possible. Their atonement could have been easily fulfilled with the army that the church was so conveniently gathering to march east. Shame and anger were two excellent motivators and Pope Urban understood exactly how to elicit them from his …show more content…
Unlike the others, this version is the only one that mentioned the Antichrist, “And if Antichrist finds there no Christians (just as at present when scarcely any dwell there), no one will be there to oppose him, or whom he may rightly overcome.” This would have been the best tool to elicit a sense of duty from the men. As unique as it was for this version to use the Antichrist it still shared similarities with the other versions. Once Pope Urban invoked the Antichrist it would have elicited anger, like Balderic of Dol’s version, a need for security, similar to Robert the Monk’s version, and the idea of trying to earn redemption, like the Gesta Version. Those three feelings would have motivated the men to march east and could have been the deciding factors that pushed the men to