This creative writing piece is in the form of an additional scene to Arthur Millers The Crucible. This scene takes place two months after the end of the Salem witch trials. It is a conversation between Mr Hale and Elizabeth Proctor. It explores and evaluates the long term devastation caused by greed and self-interest. This piece displays how dramatic the effects of greed and selfishness can be. Mr Hale reveals his own inner turmoil since the trials, and how his own pride and arrogance contributed to the hangings. Elizabeth reinforces the idea of morality, mainly in defence of her late husband. This piece is written to serve as an example of how greed can corrupt and destroy everything. It is directed to western society presently as greed is becoming a greater issue in all facets of people’s lives. Taking place in a time where many customs and ideas seem idiotic to the modern world helps provide a sense of irony because as it seems people have evolved and gained more knowledge since then greed is still as devastating regardless of time period.…
Why was it necessary? This was not the usual route, but scripture says it was necessary to go thru Samaria. Jesus could have easily chosen to take the most traveled path around the darkness and have a comfortable journey to Galilee.…
Conclusively, the three characters faced with the most severe test throughout Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, are Hale, Mary Warren, and John Proctor. Hale’s crucible is most seen toward the end of the book first seeing everything in black and white and now seeing the grey in between. Secondly, Mary’s crucible was failed and she ends up causing more problems when she really wanted to solve them. Finally, Proctor, who had to battle himself constantly over the bad decisions he has made, but ends up passing his crucible by accepting it and forgiving himself. These characters show the trials they and others went through during this time in Salem and how they beat or failed them. They realized their mistakes and in some accounts tried to right…
a statement that seems true but at the same time seems to also have an opposite truth…
The Crucible, a play by Arthur Miller, shows how intolerance can corrupt a theocratic society. In The Crucible, this is achieved by a combination of three chief contributors. The paradox mentioned in his introduction to Act I, was and is entirely true in regard to the conflicting nature of the theocratic system and the human condition. First and foremost, conformity and forced control destroy the sense of trust between villagers. Secondly, intolerant attitudes ruin all creative thought and new ideas, which could have possibly freed Salem from its twisted thinking. Finally the Puritans created the same form of oppressive government they ran away from England during the 1620s.…
Within this passage of The Crucible a major theme is brought up, that is good vs evil. The book talks about how society uses these polar opposites to explain away some of the more complex concepts in life. An example of this is shown in this passage when Mrs. Putnam asks, “Is it a natural work to lose seven children before they live a day?” (Miller 45). In her lack of understanding the nature of child death Mrs. Putnam begins to blame the Devil for the misfortune that has befallen her. Mrs. Putnam, much like the rest of society, has used the concept of good and evil, in this case God and the Devil, in order to explain greater phenomenon in life. The book presents us with the idea that evil, what everyone perceives as unjust, is something…
In this essay I am going to talk about how weakness, courage, and truth play a role in the Crucible. The first concept I am going to talk about is weakness and how it affected the Crucible.…
All the witches' judgments are fundamental to the action of cricible and accusations and dramatic accusations as well as confessions fill the room with confines, doubts and more questions or that can be seen in some acts such as in Act 1.…
In the Crucible, Arthur Miller writes of the hysteria during Salem Witch Trials, hoping that the world will never do anything stupid again because of hysteria. During the Salem Witch Trials there were many people that chose to act as individuals, rather than a community. Judge Danforth, Reverend Parris , and Abigail Williams had the power to stop, and even prevent the trials, but chose not to because they did not care for anyone except themselves. Judge Danforth could have stopped the trials when he found out that he was wrong about the whole thing. Also, Parris is the reason the trails took place, and Abigail Williams fed the flame of hysteria throughout the trails. These three individual contribute to callous attitudes that exist in Salem, and cause the ultimate deaths of the innocent.…
In the Crucible John Proctor made one of the worst mistakes in his life he was way in over his head. He and his special “lover” Abigail were making it happen while John is a married man. But that’s not even the bad part Abigail is only 17 years old and John is 33 years old. Now John’s wife can’t trust him at all wherever he goes.…
When fear grabs hold of somebody craziness erupts and there is no longer peace. When something goes wrong people tend to put the blame on anyone or anything besides themselves. In the crucible the blame is put on innocent women and this created mass hysteria and paranoia in the village. Kristallnacht was a night of violence that created mass hysteria and fear among the innocent Jews, just as Abigail did in The Crucible.…
During the 1950's, McCarthyism and the Red Scare dominated society and culture, instilling the terror and suspicions of an invisible enemy on an uninformed people. This enemy was that of communism. Written to alert society of the doom that lurked nearby, Arthur Miller's The Crucible, depicts the consequences that come from the hysteria associated with accusations made against one's neighbor and in some cases friend. From the play, one can gather that guilt in society is destructive to communal relationships. The evidence that supports this truism is embedded many times throughout the play and certainly strengthens the play's central theme.…
The theocratic town of Salem, in the late 1600s, not only advocated conformity but stifled individuality. The play, The Crucible by Arthur Miller, illustrates the conflict between conformity and individuality. Salem, a town dependent on the unity and participation, understandably teaches people from a young age to recognize the needs of the community as greater than the needs of an individual. As any unit needs something to hold it all together, Salem forces unity and social conformity through religion. Coincidentally, religion in Salem acts as the judicial system as well, making it particularly hard for individuals to rebel against the practices of the church. Therefor all members of the community follow the religious rules. The people live in fear of the forceful church that prosecutes all dissenters and the threat of hell cause the community of blind followers to not change or progress. Yet as shown in The Crucible, [that]even one brave man can stand up for change and lead the community into (IN) a better direction. John Proctor, a previously unpretentious man, chooses to risk his life and fight for change, and even a community so devoted to conformity learns to respect him as an individual. By analyzing the communal benefits of individuality and the faults of conformity in Salem as depicted in The Crucible, we can see that although [the structure of] conformity has value, the lack of proper leadership, constrictive (restrictive or oppressive would be better word choices) social pressure, and an uncompromising court system corrupt the conformist regime.…
Morality is the distinction between right and wrong. It is the determination of what should be done and what should not be done; or what is right and what is wrong. Morals deal with behaviors as well as motives. All humans live by some set of morals especially religious people. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, this is clearly evident. It is about the puritan town of Salem, Massachusetts and the hunt for witches. Many people are falsely accused of witchcraft. Throughout this account of history key characters have to make choices that challenge their beliefs and ethics. They must decide whether to do what is right, and fight against a lie, or do what’s wrong and give in to the lie to save their own lives. Elizabeth Proctor is one of those who fought for the truth, therefore she; in my opinion is the most moral character in the story.…
The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, is a rich and enticing play set in the late 1600’s describing the epic horrors and emotions through the events of the Salem witch trials. The Crucible, focuses primarily on the inconsistencies of the Salem witch trials and the extreme behavior that can result from dark desires and hidden agendas. The play begins with the discovery of several young girls and an African American slave, Tituba, in the woods just outside of Salem, dancing and pretending to conjure spirits. The Puritans of Salem stood for complete religious intolerance and stressed the need to follow the ways of the bible literally without exception. The actions of the women in the woods are entirely non-puritanical and, when caught, these actions led to dire consequences. Based around senseless and childish finger-pointing The Crucible portrays the thematic ideas of self-preservation, social responsibility, as well as desire and the quest for power.…