Preview

Political Repression Definition

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
486 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Political Repression Definition
In a journal article titled Political Repression: Iron Fists, Velvet Gloves, and Diffuse Control, UCSB professor Jennifer Earl summarizes the current academic literature on political repression and periodically notes areas in which further research ought to be conducted. Before proceeding, Earl addresses a crucial question with wide ramifications for the the rest of the research, namely how to define “repression.” On the one hand, repression could be narrowly construed to mean only direct violence against protestors, or could be loosely construed to mean any kind of law enforcement. The former would perhaps underdress the true scope of the issue, while the latter would risk dramatizing the extent to which governments repress the people and …show more content…
For example, there has been little discussion of private repression and similarly little about covert repression, which includes things like spying and surveillance. With all of this in mind, most of the research on repression focuses on two main questions: what are the causes of repression, and what are its effects? Repression takes place in varying degrees depending on the openness of a society (ranging from democratic republics to dictatorships), and is usually carried out through formal institutions such as the FBI or KGB to support the political aims of the state (273). On the second question, repression has been seen to have a deterrent effect on unwanted activity, but interestingly repression can lead to escalation and actually embolden those who are protesting. When repression takes the form of “escalated force” instead of “negotiated management” this is often the case (269). Over time, police departments in the Western world have vacillated between these two approaches, at times cracking down on protests with force and at others allowing them to proceed peacefully. Regrettably, little research has been done on the causes and consequences of repression across the globe. Only closer to home where it often takes place through more discrete channels such as spying or even, as some argue, mass incarceration. The issue of repression is closely tied in with the study of a number of other disciplines, and understanding in that context will better allow us to improve “sociology’s understanding of political and cultural change”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    GOV 2305

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    New Deal Dbq

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Which of the following was not a theme of Popular Front radicalism? The denial of civil liberties must be challenged wherever it arises—from capitalist America to communist Russia.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As part of human nature, power has a tendency to take over people, and with no regard to others, many of the individuals in major authority positions such as prison guards, police officers, and even judges manipulate that power for their mindful benefits. Such benefits are probably not affecting them on a personal level, although they do contribute to the support of their own race, gender, and social status’ group. This corruption has developed into the working society giving support and extra benefits to just a specific party. In fact, as an expanding country with various religions, ethnic groups, and the freedom to express your thoughts out to the world, we, as a country, should not discriminate anyone because they hold a different label…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right,… to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security… such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Walzer Vs Luban

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Michael Walzer is right to set a higher standard for intervention than David Luban, and there are three main reasons for this. The first is practical, namely that intervention to prevent “ordinary” oppression usually results in more instability and violence since it denies self-determination for the country’s citizens. The second is moral: Luban’s conception of “cosmopolitan” human rights is dangerously ethnocentric towards the West and can result in cultural imperialism. The third is theoretical, meaning that while interventions are ideally carried out by perfect national leaders, government officials will always be coopted or influenced by neoliberalism, racism, and selfishness.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    places these restrictions formally or covertly on oppressed groups so that they may be exploited…

    • 2248 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1984 outline

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    II. Historical climate: many governments violating human rights; attempting to control the ideas of the people…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Timmer's Definition of Law

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “A definition of crime represents the legal conditions under which the state, as an instrument of an economically dominant class, exercises its power to punish.” I feel that the state maintains the capitalist order through laws. Primarily, control is done through the governing of consciousness of the population. The ruling class gives rise to their own ideology to protect themselves. Capitalism’s most subtle means of control is to try and manipulate the minds of the people. They try to dictate the future through the people’s thinking and overall living. This type of dictatorship is cultural, psychological, economic and political. When an existing order becomes threatened, the focus on crime rises. The ruling class diverts attention and gains validation for utilization of criminal sanctions to regain stability. The public, must feel that their interests are being protected, not only the ruling class alone. In doing this the state works to serve the interests of the capitalist ruling class.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let Me Speak Analysis

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The military controlled Bolivia so that the people “can’t unite and form a common front” to easily manipulate individuals in believing that the people should be content about what they have because there are people who suffers even more. The reason behind the repressiveness of capitalism is that it requires individualism so that the government can exploit the people easily. Capitalism is hegemonic but has dominance over the people because of its militarized government. Chungara talks about various events where the militant rummaged their houses and disrupts the peace in Siglo XX. She talks about the time when their union leaders were “ambushed taken prisoner” because the government found out about a union assembly that is about to take place (Chungara and Viezzer, 80). Chungara also talks about the San Juan massacre that occurred on June 27, 1967 “because the government found out that there was going to be a plenary meeting of all the secretaries-general” and “the government didn’t want it to take place” (Chungara and Viezzer, 116). The San Juan massacre proves that the government does not value the human capital as well because they mercilessly kill innocent people just to prevent them from organizing and takes away their right to a better life. Although the people only want better living conditions, the government did not care enough to allow them to have a freedom to speak up about their needs. The MNR is also too greedy to spend their wealth on the people so they leave them in scarcity. Domitila is against capitalism because of its manipulative and violent…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    To comprehend this statement and to form either a refuting or supporting conclusion, several elements need to be considered. Firstly, in order to understand the idea that criminal justice policy is degenerating into a ‘crude populism’, the term ‘populism’ needs to be defined. Secondly, an evaluation has to be made on the effect media has on society. This involves the discussion of how ‘moral panics’ are implemented and used to create fear in society that ultimately leads to a punitive populism. To assess the role political institutions…

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    All authors, mainly, emphasize on necessity of following civil disobedience position when the state acts in illegal or unjust way to show opposite position and non-violent ideology. In the meantime, authors have different views regarding criteria of justice and assessing state actions; nevertheless, it can be explained by different historical epochs and…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do we live in a world where violent resistance is no longer a realistic option to oppose an oppressive regime? The Kenny reading showed that non-violence is a path that can lead to regime change. Why is that? Is it because a non-violent struggle is morally superior to a violent one, and is therefore difficult to oppose? After all, it’s difficult to justify violence against those who struggle without violence, for human rights, justice and democracy, things most people desire. To repress them would be a blatant violation of basic human decency, whereas in an armed struggle, repression can be justified, and implemented on a mass scale, in the name of stability. Perhaps a non-violent struggle is also superior to an armed one because of the question it poses? When a government faces a rebellion, its survival depends on its ability to out-kill the other side. But in a non-violent struggle, the government’s survival depends on its legitimacy in the eyes of the people. The struggle therefore becomes over votes, and rally sizes, both of which governments cannot win over easily when they are struggling against the numerically larger and more in-touch members of civil society. This could explain why governments often rely on crowd dispersal and repression, to combat non-violent activism.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Mike

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “ Throughout our history ,we [Americans] have been willing to trade freedom for safety during wartime”(St Luis Post Dispatch Editorial,11 October 2001).This essay will argue that a responsible government has to protect its citizens and this protection will include the use of censorship but it should not resemble an authoritarian country otherwise freedom of speech and free exercise of religion will be lost. An examination will be made about the positive aspects of censorship and why censorship is so vital to our culture,there will also be an examination about the negative impacts of censorship and how some governments try to use it to manipulate its citizens and lastly there will be emphasis to how censorship should and can be used in a democratic society.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment and Classification. Polity Press Press: Cambridge…

    • 3199 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Internet Censorship

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We've been arguing for a while that attempts by various governments to shut down forms of communication during protests and riots only serves to make protesters and rioters angrier. Some new (quite timely) research, pointed out by Mathew Ingram, seems to agree that internet censorship tends to make such problems worse. The research is a quick read, and certainly goes further than efforts like L. Gordon Crovitz's "it's okay if the world didn't end."…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays