Preview

Political Parties Vs Federalists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
866 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Political Parties Vs Federalists
During the early years of our nation, there was not a great deal of brotherly love, peace and agreement that could be found in the government. Two political parties had evolved that possessed interests that spanned both ends of every argument and political idea. The Federalists believed that the nation should have a very centralized government and stood firm that this would bring about the most order and prosperity. To the contrary, Republicans wanted the rights to stay with the people and States and therefore felt that the federal government should have little control to protect the rights of the people. Many historical documents record the struggles between the two parties. The main struggles revolved around three areas. The first area …show more content…
Any decision that had to be made, the Republicans believed they should use the Constitution as the authority to make the appropriate decision. If the Constitution did not delegate the power to the Federal government, Republicans thought that the States should have the authority. Jefferson stated this in the Kentucky resolution when he wrote, “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively or to the people”.
Freedom of speech was also an area of dispute. Freedom of speech came under attack in The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 were written, many believed, to weaken the Republican party. This act consisted of four laws that were targeted at the Republicans’ power and ability to grow in numbers as well as grow in strength. The Naturalization Act made it more difficult for immigrants to become citizens by extending the timeline from five years to 14 years. During that time, most immigrants favored the Republican party, so this would hurt the growth of the party. The Alien Enemies Act allowed for male citizens of other nations during war to be deported or arrested, and the Alien Friends Act gave the president the right to deport immigrants that they suspected were spying or plotting against the government. The last law which was the Sedition Act was the law that limited the freedom of speech
…show more content…
They felt this was the best way to keep control. Republicans wanted the people to have the ultimate say. Republicans felt that the First National Bank was going to favor northern businesses as opposed to southern businesses. Jefferson wrote, “To make a thing which may be bought and sold, is not to prescribe regulations for buying and selling.” The First National Bank gave more power to the Federal government than the States. The control of the Federal government over the States continued to be evident in the Alien and Sedition Acts. The Kentucky Resolution pointed out the desire of Republicans to favor local government over Federal government when Jefferson stated, “the several States composing the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The two main political parties in early America, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, fought many ideological and political battles from 1790 to 1810. Conflicts between these two parties grew out of their opposing ideologies the Democratic-Republicans supported states rights and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, whereas the Federalists favored a strong central government and a broader interpretation of the Constitution. However there are more than 3 major topics that I could talk about involving the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans between the years 1789 and 1812. Some of the topics are boring and some of the topics are pretty interesting.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AP US DBQ

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Jefferson wrote to Gibeon Granger about the powers of the states. Jefferson believes the country is too large to have a single federal government. He believes that the states should have some power too. Jefferson says the Republicans have accepted these rights from the Constitution and the federalists have opposed them.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Jefferson's resolution for Kentucky, he went even further by declaring that ultimate sovereignty rested with the states, which empowered them to reject federal laws to which they objected. He stated, "To their resolutions passed at the last session, respecting certain unconstitutional laws of Congress, commonly called the alien and sedition laws, would be faithless indeed to themselves, and to those they represent,…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History DBQ

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Federalist and Dem-Reps parties constantly used to debate their views of government. The Dem-Reps were argued against Federalists beliefs that were unconstitutional as shown in Document D , Thomas Jefferson stated the Federalist National Bank unconstitutional and Document C James Madison (Jefferson’s Dem-Rep assistant) the “Virginia Resolutions” ruled that limited liberties was unconstitutional. Thomas Jefferson though a Dem-Rep constantly contradicted his own views with his various actions when he felt they were necessary .Although Dem-Reps had a strict interpretation of the constitution it neared toward a loose interpretation during from Jefferson and Madison’s actions , these actions included attacking the Barbary Pirates, the Embargo Act , and the Louisiana Purchases.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1977 Dbq

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Alien and Sedition Acts were a series of four bills passed in June and July of 1798 that revealed the disagreements between Federalists and Democratic Republicans. The two parties debated over many things, such as foreign policy, the strength of federal government, and states’ rights. These debates defined the effort to decide our country’s future. Examples of the differences between Federalist and Democratic Republican views are the French Revolution, Kentucky & Virginia Resolutions, and the XYZ Affair. These events all resulted in conflicts of the late 1790’s.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson and Madison DBQ

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When Jefferson first took office he took a strong stand against the ideas and beliefs of the Federalist Party. Jefferson alleged that the nation “can never be harmonious and solid while so respectable a portion of its citizens support principles which go directly to a change of the federal Constitution” (Doc. A). Jefferson initially viewed the use loose interpretation of the Constitution to make laws and policies, as a direct challenge to state power which the Democratic - Republican Party so strongly believed in . He believed that Federalists were wrong in their way of interpreting the Constitution and that they were trying to “sink the state governments, consolidate them into one, and to monarchies that” (Doc. A). Jefferson believed that the “country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a single government…” (Doc. A) And feared that with too much power a monarchy could soon consume the United States again. Jackson believed that with loose interpretation of the constitution things such as even religion could be controlled by the government. Jackson stated that “no power to…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions were written by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. They declared the Sedition Act to be in violation of the First and Tenth Amendments. These resolutions stated that the states had the right to deem any law passed by congress unconstitutional if it violated the Bill of Rights. They argued that the Constitution was an agreement between the states so the government had no right to exercise powers not delegated to it and if they did then the states had the right to void them. In other words, the states…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back when George Washington was first elected president, there were no political parties. Soon after, in 1796, the Federalist party, founded by Alexander Hamilton, and the Democratic-Republican party, founded by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, were formed. The point of these parties was to form alliances with those who share the same beliefs as you. If you wanted something done with the country, you needed some help, and joining a political party is just the way to get it. Though the two parties were created for the same purposes, they both had many different political views.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two conflicting interpretations of the constitution from the Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped shape and form the two standing parties in the U.S. by creating opinions on still standing topics in America. The Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped build what is now the Republicans and the Democratic parties we have in America now. Looking back on the Federalist views from the era of 1789-1800 they are very similar to what the Republicans believe in now. You can see the parralism of many ideas including thoughts on immagration and goverment regulation, as many in the Republican party do now, the Federalist support limiting immigrants. As well as the federalist the Democractic-Republicans have helped form the Democratic…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many different views on how to run the government, it was hard to depict which parties’ group would be the strongest and the best fit to control the country: the Federalists’ or the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists’ wanted a very strong government to bring together the bickering states. On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans pictured more independent state governments to rule the people. Although they didn’t agree on many things they did have one idea in common, such as, both parties wanted to follow the Constitution, but in different ways.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forming a new government comes with challenges and obstacles that the people need to overcome for the greater good of the country. During the time that the Americans formed the government, arguments were placed into the open to be solved. Solutions that were given, many were rejected and caused a lot of disagreement. Creating a government brought the country into disagreement between the anti-federalists and federalists for the concerns of rights of the people and power that was shared among them. Firstly, the anti-federalists disagreed how the rights were to be given to one another as well as the division of power between the states. Secondly, the federalists were satisfied with the conditions that were given to them, including the power they could have and what human rights that would protect them.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    American populace was partitioned to two groups. One group comprises of the federalists who were living in the north. Their advantage was in favor of the merchants, ship-owners, and the industrialist. They are currently known as the Democrat party. The North was experiencing a modern upset and Democratic Party was supportive of this change. The Second group comprises of the anti-federalists, who were living in the south and were in light of a legitimate concern for state and farmers right. They are presently known as the republican. History of the Americans demonstrates that the two political vested parties had/have their own particular thoughts. Those thoughts were planted to the most youthful era by the…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On one hand, Federalists believed that we should’ve had a big federal government that would act as an overseer to the states. The reason why Federalists thought that the government should be like that was so they could enforce necessary laws that would prevent corruption…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two political parties in the United States of America and those two political parties are , federalist and Anti-Federalist. Both of these political parties were made in the 1600’s , which was a very long time ago. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist both have separate opinions about things ,so they dont always agree. In fact ,ever…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The thought was that the federal government had a few enumerated powers that it could not exceed (absent amendment) whereas the states can do as they see fit to ensure the safety and welfare of their residents. For example, states can pass laws criminalizing a wide range of conduct such as murder, burglary, rape, robbery, etc. The federal government is limited in its authority to proscribe states are often called (by both courts and politicians) laboratories of democracy. The same basic issues exist is basically every state; how to keep people safe, how to make sure people safe, how to make sure people get needed medical care, how to improve education. While many states may approach the same issue in the same manner, other states may adopt novel approaches. For example, Massachusetts and Utah both tackles healthcare reform, Louisiana is using state money to send kids from bad schools to private schools, and other states have legalized medicinal and/or recreational marijuana. If something has a positive effect on quality of life issues, it is often adopted by money other states, and perhaps nationwide.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays