Preview

Political Changes In The North And South After The Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1244 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Political Changes In The North And South After The Civil War
The Northern and Southern parts of the United States urbanized along different lines. The South continued to be a primarily agricultural economy while the North became further industrialized with each passing day. With these major changes happening in the economy different group cultures and political values came about. The Civil War was mainly started by the sectional tension from the north and south, the Missouri Compromise, the removal of Texas, and politics of slavery.
The prominent problem that was responsible for the disruption of the union, nonetheless, was the dispute over the prospect of slavery. That quarrel led to secession, and secession issued a war in which the Northern and Western states and territories fought to conserve the
…show more content…
During this time the north went through a market and religious revolution. The market changed in the northeast from a rural one to an industrialized one, starting the first industrial revolution in the United States. Many changes happened what was once apprenterships now became wage earning jobs; meaning that men used to practice under a master of the job they wanted to have, to learn their skill set now men are taking jobs instead to earn more money for their families. What was once the quite rural countryside quickly turned into urban centers; they were calling these changes “internal improvements.” This time period brought about the discovery of the middle class or working class, people who weren’t seen as poor or rich they were considered comfortable. The religious reform brought about the ideas of self-control and anti-materialism meaning that one would only own what one needed. It brought about a new work ethic based on Christianity, and it brought about the making of the middle class. Meanwhile, in the south, nothing really changed. They had no market revolution, no middle or working class, and no reform. There awakening reinforced southern paternalism, a household economy, and family. The south believed strongly that the man was the head of the household and that there slaves were part of that family and were to be treated as such. They felt …show more content…
The outcome of such was a laborious legislative encounter amongst Southern and Northern councils, the South claimed that Congress as well as the states did not require the authority to constitute against the territorial expansion of slavery. Recognizing that this sectional split could tear apart the country, Whigs and Democrats decided to come to an agreement that they felt would help avoid secession. The resulting Compromise of 1850 accepted California to be acknowledged as a free state, but strengthened the fugitive slave law and made no requirements for how other territories might address the slavery issue. This causing the Whigs to be incapable of successfully addressing the slavery issue after 1850. Their southern affiliates virtually all possessed slaves, though the northeastern Whigs represented entrepreneurs who respected national unity and a national economic system but really could care less about slavery. Unfortunately, there was no compromise that could keep the Whigs amalgamated, causing the party to fall apart in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first cause of the Civil war were the economic differences between the Northern and Southern states. Document Two shows how states made their money. The Northern states got their money through manufacturing goods from factories, and the South…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The north relied heavily on industry and commerce, while the south relied heavily on plantations and agriculture. They were also seeing completely different views on the subject of slavery. Three big causes of the Civil War were that of states vs. federal rights, slavery within territories, and the abolition movement.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War which lasted from 1861 to 1877 was mainly caused by the diverging society between the North and the South. The North and the South had different goals. There were many factors that led to the war and the chief ones were political and economic differences between the North and the South. The North's aggression to control the South had led to the point where it was intolerable. The issue on slavery was one of the cause of the Civil War. Slavery and slave trades had become a big part of the South's economy. The slaves were needed to work on plantations which helped the South prospered. During the 19th Century, the North worked hard on abolishing slavery which they thought was an disgrace to the Union. Compromises were proposed working toward an end to slavery. One of the compromises was the Missouri Compromise which made Maine, a free state, and Missouri, a slave state, excluded slavery from Louisiana Territory and everything above the 36?30?north latitude. Other compromises such as the Compromise of 1850 did pleased both sides. The Compromise included admitting California as a free state and interstate slave trade to be abolished which went in favour of the North. The Compromise also went with the South when it included stricter fugitive slave laws and New Mexico and Utah were created without slave restrictions. A book called, "Uncle Tom's Cabin" was also published at this time emphasising the evils of slavery. This added tension between the North and the South. The compromises seemed to have settled the issue of slavery but it was just putting back the problem. The North and the South were far from settling the slave issue. Another reason that caused the South to go to war was the difference in economic policies. The North was expanding more in the commercial and industrial side while the South was reliant on agriculture. Cities and factories had developed in the North and in the South, it was still staple-producing and agrarian. The North's industry…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Civil War ended in April of 1865, and it left many things behind to be dealt with. There were many issues, and in a lot of them the North and South had different point of views. Although the North was very rich, the South was tremendously poor. Despite the result of the Civil War, the Union acted like they were in control, and the South couldn’t do anything about it. One controversy that the North had was if they should allow the Southern states govern themselves. The North should not let the states in the South lead their own government. It would be too dangerous and would be a major setback toward the North.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were some similarities and some differences between the South before the Civil War and the South after the Civil war. The old South and the new South had some similarities. One of the similarities was that the attitudes of many white southerners didn’t change regarding African-Americans and support for certain policies. Before the Civil War, many southerners supported slavery, nullification, states’ rights, and secession. After the Civil War, the southerners tried to elect many of the same representatives to Congress who served before the Civil War who believed in these concepts.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economies of both the North and the South experienced a dramatic change as well. The Southern economy had printed false money, causing a huge increase in inflation, while the North's economy was stable. Due to this rise in inflation, and the Emancipation Proclamation, the plantation system failed. All of this, on top of a blockade held by the North, all hurt the Southern economy.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most political disputes were mostly over the issue of slavery, the two sides of this issue were should slavery be abolished in the union, or should it be left alone. Because slavery was such a hot topic, many compromises including the Missouri compromise, and the compromise of 1850 touched on slavery, and tried to appease both sides. Compromise seemed to be the best and most effective to use in the early nineteenth century, but by 1860 this no longer seemed possible. The two differing viewpoints had little room for compromise this change being because of political, social, and intellectual reasons.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The flaws of the compromise are pretty evident. Geographical separation enforced by law did not change the attitudes of either party. Secondly, the second…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1600’s a social difference that the North & the South had was slave labor, the North did not depend on it like the South did. Most the of people in the North were families of Puritans, Dutch, & Quakers that operated their own farms and business, unlike the South most of their groups were people seeking to gain wealth. The Northern colonies, Puritans and Quakers based their societies of the bible, women were granted education, and young men were expected to earn a career on trade or work towards religious or political. Colonists in the South created a society based on farming, wealthy plantation owners controlled the economy, they also controlled the social and political life of the south. People in the South lived in large farms,…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However the election of Abraham Lincoln was not the only reason for secession, but a rather a series of rooted problems. Sectional tensions between northern and southern states arose as early as the 1840s when America first began its westward expansion into new territories. Every new territory added raised the question of its position on slavery, as the balance between free and slave states was fragile. In an attempt to gain supporters and appeal to both citizens from the north and south, Douglas introduced the idea of popular sovereignty i n which the citizens of the territory would choose whether it entered the Union pro-slavery or anti-slavery. While this may have seemed like a good idea at the time, it did not prove to be so good in Kansas.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once Industrialization began in the West a lot of things began to change. There were much different problems occurring in the West than in the South. One major turning point for the West is, the expansion of farming by the American settlers. The American settlers were farmers by trade for many years before the Civil War had even began. For the most part all Americans were a part of the farming industry. In the West, most of the population lived in the land that they farmed on. During the period of the Civil War, congressmen from the North began to cheat and take advantage of the fact that they were not too many congress men from the South. They encouraged the rapid growth of free labor in the West by passing what is known as the Homestead Act.…

    • 1958 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil War During the mid 1800s a horrendous conflict commenced in the United States caused by a friction about race, and slavery between the North and the confederacy. This disagreement managed to generate a Civil War. The military action stimulated a humongous slaughter on the Confederates stand. The confederates undertook a plethora of destruction during, along with after the war. When portraying the aftermath of being defeated the South is confronted with profound deprivation, lack of a social government/bankruptcy, immense amount of destruction, and ongoing brutality.…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slave Compromise

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During 1820-1860, several reasons in the political views on slavery eventually led to the termination of compromise. Henry Clay, the Great Compromiser, generated the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850 in order to maintain the country as a whole. The Missouri Compromise declared Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The Compromise of 1850 admitted California as a free state, ended slave trade in Washington D.C. and a stronger Fugitive Slave Law passed. In 1833, Senator Henry Clay stated,”…it is impossible that South Carolina ever desired for a moment to become a separate and independent state. Additionally, although Declaration of the National Anti-Slavery Convention in 1834 opposed slavery, they did believe Congress had “no right to interfere with any of the slave states…” .However, the northern disagreement against the Compromise of 1850, especially the Fugitive Slave Law, Wilmot Proviso and popular sovereignty, increased slavery’s opposition. This was emphasized in the Election of 1860, where not one Southern state voted for Lincoln; Lincoln won all of the “free” states except New Jersey. This major issue over slavery ultimately led to southern succession therefore deterioration of compromise. This is similar all of the times when individual states attempted to secede from the Union for various reasons, such as states’ rights. Western Expansion in Polk’s presidency due to Manifest Destiny created problems if new territories should be slave or free states. Like always, the North opposed slave states in new territories, and South favored it.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    North And South Analysis

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The North and South are both different, but they both have great strengths and weaknesses. The Civil War was started by The Kansas-Nebraska act. When Kansas got the right to vote, residents from Missouri crossed over the Kansas border to vote so that Kansas would become a slave state. Missouri wanted to make Kansas a slave state. “On July 21, 1861, the first battle of the civil war” (American Odyssey) broke out because of the feud between Kansas and Missouri.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1800’s there was much turmoil over the debate of slavery and whether it was inhumane or not. Slavery caused the nation to separate into 2 factions; the north, who believe in abolishing slavery and the south who thought that slavery was a “benign institution” as quoted by Ulrich B. Phillips. There is much debate whether slavery was the prominent cause of the Civil War. Contrary to popular belief, slavery was not the ultimate cause of the Civil War; in fact the economic, cultural, and political differences between the North and South played more prominent roles in the instigation of the Civil War and influenced the beginnings of slavery.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays