Preview

Policing Function

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1027 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Policing Function
Court Issues Analysis
The court and court administrators are faced with numerous issues on a daily basis; everything from the crimes being committed, the language barriers, victims’ rights, and budget related issues just to name a few. The language barrier issue is one of the major challenges faced by the criminal justice system and administrators. The Administrative Office establishes the standards and guidelines for selecting and using interpreters in federal court proceedings (Interpreters Act 1978).
Issues Courts and Administrators Face
Perhaps the issues courts and administrators face in the courts today is the congestion, backlog, and delay in cases awaiting proceedings. This is a serious issue for courts and administrators in that due to the growing backlog cases may not receive the best of the justice system. Administrators may find themselves rushing through cases to get as many cases processed as possible. This can result in mistakes being made because the courts are not designed to function under such pressures and therefore errors occur in what is referred to as the assembly-line-justice (Stevens, 2004).
Because of the stress prosecutors are under cases are dropped without a reason, this is known as nolle prosqui, according to The Free Dictionary it means "we shall no longer prosecute," which is a declaration made to the judge by a prosecutor in a criminal case (or by a plaintiff in a civil lawsuit) either before or during trial, meaning the case against the defendant is being dropped. This also contributes to the courts being too busy which cause the increase in the number of cases entered into a plea bargain. In addition, the stress which overwhelms the courts and administrators can also increase the number of cases involving serious crimes to be included with cases involving lesser crimes in order to have the cases close (Hill &Hill, 2005).
About 35 states have such a stressed-out court system that it 's not uncommon for jailed defendants



References: Gaines, L., & Miller, R. (2003). Criminal Justice in Action. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Hill, G., & Hill, K. (2005). Nolle Prosequi. Retrieved from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Nolle+prosequi Legal Information Institute. (2012, October 23). Interpreters in Courts of the United States. Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1827 Office of Justice Programs. (nd). About Victims ' Rights. Retrieved from http://www.victimlaw.org/victimlaw/pages/victimsRights.jsp Robinson, M. B. (2009). Justice Blind? Ideals and Realities of American Criminal Justice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall. Stevens, M. (2004). Court Issues. Retrieved from http://faculty.ncwc.edu/mstevens/111/111lect09.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Correspondence 66-64

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It was a pleasure to meet you at the convention for trial attorneys in New York last week. In addition to the interesting program highlights of the regular sessions, the informal discussions with people like you are an added plus at these meetings. Your contribution to the program was very beneficial and highly informative.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cja Courtsystems

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    | |Attorney, county attorney, and U.S. Attorney, and |punishment. Also bargaining plea agreements. If they |…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone thinks they have it exactly right on TV shows like Law and Order or CSI. Someone commits a crime, is charged and found guilty all in an hour or two. For many crimes this is not the case, the offender may never be found, or someone maybe falsely convicted. It all hinges on a set of people. The judge, the defense attorney and the prosecutor. All of which are not perfect like the US Judicial System, and justice is not always served. Individual rights are violated due to prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance by criminal defense counsel, and judicial misconduct. In some instances, the guilty…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Al Vs Rowley

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the landmark case of Hendrick Hudson District Board of Education v. Rowley, I believe the Supreme Court’s decision to deny Amy the assistance of an interpreter was fair for several reasons. First of all, she was previously given the services of an interpreter and she did not use them. Instead of relying on the interpreter, Amy used lip reading and asked teachers to repeat instructions. Second, Amy was passing from grade to grade without the use an interpreter. Third, Amy was performing better than…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cja 224 Week 1

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The American criminal court systems are made up of Federal and State courts. The State court deals mainly with civil, traffic, and family issues. The Federal court handles more serious violations which include federal and government violations and issues between actual states. If the case is either federal or state trial courts determine guilt and convictions. Our court systems are very complex, but recently Community courts have been added and that is used for less offense, and mostly used for mediation.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs Arizona

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. Schmallager, F. (2011). Criminal justice today: An introductory text for the 21st century (11th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ. Pearson/Prentice Hall Retrieved 4/17/2013…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Schmalleger, F. (2011). Criminal Justice Today: An introductory text for the twenty-first century (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The following paper will discuss the current language barriers and lack of interpreter availability in the court systems today. The court administrator is responsible for addressing this problem and improving the situation. Therefore, this paper will also cover the efforts that the court administrator has made to correct the issue at hand and whether the efforts have been successful or not.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court system in America has been around since the middle of the 1600’s and has played a crucial role in the development of how things are done when it comes to the criminal justice side. From today’s federal court and our typical state court, these dual court systems came about from a mutual agreement presented from our nation’s founders. In the last 200 years, states’ rights have gradually waned relative to the power of the federal government, but the dual-court system still exists. Even today, state courts do not hear cases involving alleged violations of federal law, nor do federal courts get involved in deciding issues of state law unless there is a conflict between local or state statutes (Schmalleger, Hall, & Dolatowski, 2010).…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The courtroom workgroup is made up of people in the criminal justice system such as judges and prosecutors. They decide what happens in every case that is presented in the system and use their discretion on whether to deny or accept a case. The way that cases are identified as serious depends on the evidence that is available. Other factors such as witnesses, prior record, and criminal activity is all taken into account. If the courtroom workgroup decides that there isn’t enough information for the case to go on they drop it because they see no use in wasting their time with it. Walker mentions that most of the cases like rape are what get dropped because of insufficient evidence and people tend to see it as the offender getting off the hook (2015, p. 66). It may be seen as an injustice because those cases don’t go through to have a trial, but too much work is put into cases that the best option is to just put all the effort in the ones that will get a conviction. Those other cases that are seen as more serious because of prior record and the type of crime committed usually have a high going rate. Some crimes like murder are known to have higher going rate because of how…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majorities of individuals charged with a crime, whether state or federal never see the inside of a courtroom, and if they do see a courtroom it is not in the context that one would think. The defendant is not sitting in a courtroom full of spectators watching as attorneys argue the guilt or innocence of the defendant to twelve jurors who will eventually decide their fate. This perception of a courtroom has been molded into the minds of Americans through television. The real picture of how the majority of cases are tried is not in a courtroom, but a small room with the prosecutor who pushes the defendant to take a plea bargain. Plea bargaining is a process that uses negotiation to entice the defendant into pleading guilty to a lesser charge or only one of several charges without going to trial, which is a violation…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Schmalleger, F. (2011). Criminal Justice Today: An introductory text for the twenty-first century (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ. Pearson Prentice Hall…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since their creation in the 1990’s, problem-solving courts have become of much interest to the legal community. Not only are these courts revolutionary in their way of processing cases, but also they are proving to have great success rates. One of the most important aspects of the problem-solving courts is how much more involved a judge is with each case. In traditional courts, a judge will most likely read off the names of the people in the docket, and simply sentence an individual according to what the DA has already negotiated. During a problem-solving court, the judge has the opportunity to get to know each defendant on a more personal level, and be able to help the defendant succeed. While results have shown that the more involved judges are, the more likely it is for a program to succeed, there is much criticism regarding the judge’s attachment to each…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many parts of the courtroom work group professionals who successfully pursuit justice and the process of convicting a criminal. The courtroom work group has a major role in convicting and finalizing a case. In the courtroom work group, there are three groups of people that hold the entire courtroom together. Without the work group, the courtroom would not flow, and coming to a conclusion to the case would not be as easy. The work group is made up of the Judge, the Defense Attorney, Public Defender, Court Recorders, and the Prosecutor Attorney. Which all are part of the courtroom work group which they work together to reach a decision, in the case by interacting among themselves and who’s involved an implicit recognition and rule of civility, cooperation, and sharing their goals. There are many roles in the work group, and if they are not all followed through with then the results could be different than what they should be. In this paper, we will look at the roles of the prosecutor, how the criminal justice funnel effects the courtroom work group and what will help eliminate the funnel and reduce the backlog of cases.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    4. The high cost, long delays, personal inconvenience and embarrassment entailed in many criminal cases which favors the offenders.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays