Preview

Policing and the Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1101 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Policing and the Constitution
PolMonique King
April 25, 2013
LP2 Assignment: Policing and the Constitution
Probable cause: sufficient reason based upon known facts to believe a crime has been committed or that certain property is connected with a crime. Probable cause must exist for a law enforcement officer to make an arrest without a warrant, search without a warrant, or seize property in the belief the items were evidence of a crime. Probable cause in my understanding means that a police officer cannot accuse you of a crime that they are not able to prove. If you are pulled over due to being suspected of drunk driving, they have to give you sobriety tests or see open containers in order to give you a ticket or take you into custody. They just can’t see you swerve while driving and take you to jail without proof.
Exclusionary rule: the rule that evidence secured by illegal means and in bad faith cannot be introduced in a criminal trial. The technical term is that it is "excluded" upon a motion to suppress made by the lawyer for the accused. It is based on the constitutional requirement that "…no [person] can be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" (Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, applied to the states by 14th Amendment). The breakdown of Exclusionary rule is that police officials are not able to raid your house and find drugs or illegal items and use them in the court of law against without obtaining a search warrant first. This also means that when they talk to you about the offenses that you are being obtained on, they have to let you know that it can be used in the court of law. I think the exclusionary rule is a good rule because I’m sure a lot of people have gotten off because evidence was received illegal just to try to bring someone down. This law helps respect every individual right in my opinion.
Fruit of the poisoned tree: any physical or verbal evidence police are able to acquire by using illegally obtained evidence is known as the fruit of



Cited: http://dictionary.law.com/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Policing and the Constitution While police officers are responsible for serving the public, responding to crime, and keeping communities safe, agencies are to uphold the constitutional rights of all citizens. The constitution protects all Americans, and also protects and limits law enforcement agencies. The biggest impact the constitution has on police organization is in regards to arrest, innocent until proven guilty, arrest warrants, search and seizures, and working within the basic rights the constitution affords all suspects.…

    • 679 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1914, during the Supreme Court case Weeks versus the United States, the exclusionary rule was established (Hendrie 1). The exclusionary rule was a part of the Fourth Amendment. It states that evidence found at a crime scene is not admissible if it was not found under the correct procedures. This means that the government cannot conduct illegal searches of a person or place and use evidence that is found at that time. The government must go through the procedures of obtaining warrants or have probable cause to search an individual or place. The exclusionary rule is used to provide civil rights for individuals and restricts powers of the local and federal government (Lynch 1).…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Police Powers

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Bail Bail means that after someone has been charged they are free from police custody until the next stage of the process of the case (trial). The custody officer has the power to either decide if bail is granted or not. If the officer refuses to grant bail they must present the case to magistrate court soon as possible.…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The exclusionary rule mandates courts to ban the introduction of evidence that is either incriminating or not that was obtained illegal. The exclusionary rule prevents evidence that was obtained by bad methods to be used in a court of law, no matter how incriminating the evidence is to the defendant. The bad methods refer to the actions of the investigators and the procedures that the investigators took while obtaining the evidence in question. There are five possible constitutional rights that the investigator could have violated that fall under the exclusionary rule. The first constitutional right is the Fourth amendment’s ban on unreasonable searches and seizures. The second and third constitutional rights are the Fifth Amendment’s ban on coerced incriminating statements and the Sixth amendments right to counsel. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee due process of law in administering identification procedures. Also most states have their own version of the exclusionary rule worked into their state constitutions or statues, some of which predate the Constitution…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individual Paper (Policing in America Society Paper) Jesus K. Martes Santos CJA/214 February 27, 2013…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Victim's Rights

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The exclusionary rule permits a criminal defendant to prevent the prosecution from introducing at trial otherwise…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finally, the exclusionary rule excludes illegally seized evidence from federal trials. Originally enacted to protect individual’s rights from official misconduct and to maintain judicial integrity, its purpose is to deter the violation of the fourth Amendment rights by police (2012).…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exclusionary rule is a term used to refer to the legal principle in the United Sates, which holds that evidence analyzed and collected in violation of a person's constitutional rights. It is sometimes admissible for the persecution of criminal in the court of law. To protect the constitutional rights, an exclusionary rule might be considered as an example of a prophylactic rule which is created by the Judiciary. In most cases, it is used to protect the constitutional rights of a person such as liberty of property, deprived of life, and right to worship any religion.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of the exclusionary rule was a principle of law that illegally obtained evidence may not be admitted in court. The exclusionary rule was one of the few laws the court system had made to enforce the Forth Amendment’s unreasonable search and seizure clause. The many exceptions and alternatives to the rule caused major controversy over why the rule even stands.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Analysis

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The exclusionary rule is a legal procedure in the United States, which falls under the constitution. It protects citizens of the country in making sure that law enforcement officers are operating lawfully and that they abide by all search and seizure laws. It goes so far to protect the citizens of The United States that if a law enforcement officer illegally obtains evidence it can and most likely will be thrown out of the court. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the exclusionary rule, exploring its fallacies…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exclusionary rule is a law that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. Now imagine how our system would function without the exclusionary rule. A police officer could detain, arrest or search an individual and his property based on bias, a hunch or because they just felt like it, without reasonable cause. If the officer discovered in criminating evidence, it could be freely admitted at the individual’s criminal trial. And that evidence that is found without the search warrant would be eligible even though it was found unlawfully. The officer would have no incentive to comply with Fourth Amendment restrictions. The imprecise possibility of civil law suits or department discipline would not discourage the misconduct of the police.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To protect the American peoples 4th Amendment right “against unreasonable searches and seizures” from law enforcement using illegally seized evidence in a criminal trial against them, the exclusionary rule was created. The U.S. Supreme Court deemed any evidence illegally obtained inadmissible in a criminal trial, and any other evidence obtained during an illegal search and seizure inadmissible as well. This is known as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The exclusionary rule applies to evidence that has been collected in violation of an individual's Constitutional rights (Hall, 2014). The evidence that is collected during an illegal search or seizure could be found inadmissible during a trial. In 1914, the Supreme Court found that illegally obtained evidence would not be admissible in federal trials, it wasn’t until 1961, that states were also included in this ruling. The exclusionary rule is an attempt to prevent the police from violating an individual’s fundamental rights. There has been extensive debate regarding the exclusionary rule, moreover, it is important to note the rule has not been established into the Constitution. The main argument that surrounds the exclusionary rule is the…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 8, Article 1: NYPD issues new stop-and-frisk rules Numerous individuals have a vast misconstruing on the variations between Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion. Why is it important for people to understand the differences between these two important concepts? Understanding the differences between the two is essential on the grounds that one will result in a lawful search and the alternative will cause an unlawful search and seizure. As a quick definition, according to the textbook, Probable Cause is a law enforcement officer’s belief that supported by evidences and circumstances, that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 205). Whereas, Reasonable Suspicion can be considered to be more of an inclination a law enforcement officer will get (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 237). Reasonable Suspicion is employed when conducting an investigative stop; conversely, Probably Cause is required to arrest or place a suspect into custody (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 237). An officer must have both Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion to conduct a stop and frisk. Officers are taught this during their time in…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Procedure Michele Lira CJA/364 November 18, 2013 Christopher Bragg 1 Exclusionary Rule Evaluation The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to exclude evidence obtained in violation of a criminal defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. It is also a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by the Fourth Amendment. Some exceptions of the exclusionary rule is barring the use at trial of evidence obtained pursuant to an unlawful search and seizure. Some other exceptions to the exclusionary rule are: (1) a second, unpoisoned/untainted source had a major rule in finding the evidence, (2) the evidence would have been discovered…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays