Preview

Police Stop-and-Frisk Program in Bronx Is Ruled Unconstitutional

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
360 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Police Stop-and-Frisk Program in Bronx Is Ruled Unconstitutional
Pedro Feliciano May. 7, 2013 Police Stop-And-Frisk Program in Bronx is ruled Unconstitutional In this article by Joseph Goldstein, facts point out that N.Y.P.D.’s rule to stop and frisk has been ruled Unconstitutional. Judge, Shira A. Scheindlin of Federal District court in
Manhattan, said “Officers were routinely stopping people outside the buildings without reasonable suspicion that they were trespassing”. With this stop-and-frisk program innocent people are being stopped outside of Bronx Tap buildings. “During October of 2012 which nine black and Latino residents testified about being stopped while leaving their homes or visiting friends and relatives as guests”. This situation lead to improper arrest by the N.Y.P.D., “As a person exits a building, the ruling said, the police suddenly materialize, stop the person, demand identification, and question the person about where he or she is coming from and what he or she is doing, especially if the person is a young black man; in some cases the officers then detain the person in a police van”. Though the police Commissioner, Raymond W. Kelly, really did not like the ruling of the
Stop-and-frisk program. “Contending that the program, also known as clean halls, gave residents of Bronx buildings, a modicum of safety for less prosperous tenants. Their landlords explicitly requested this extra level of protection”. This program seems Unconstitutional but it has lead to several recent arrest for illegal guns. PJ. Browne, the department’s chief spokesperson, said “on Dec. 16, officers arrested a man on a rooftop of a building in the Bronx. A hearing was called by Judge Sheindlin to discuss ways on how to resolve this issue. One way was to require the Police Department to create a formal written Policy. Judge Sheindlin

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    During a recorded statement, Officer Hutchins stated that on October 25, 2016, at approximately 0038 hours, he was assigned…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cord Meeting Case Study

    • 4294 Words
    • 18 Pages

    hear oral argument on the petition. The notice to the petitioner setting the hearing shall state,…

    • 4294 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    only turned himself in after the NYPD found out about the incident after the media reported in on television. The NYPD was not called by New…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    house, and was threatened by an officer that he would be "dragged out of here."…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 496 Agency Paper

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During this week there was an incident in were gang members hanging in front of the school provided a…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The video I will be reflecting upon is about the NYPD frisk policy and the controversy with the racial profiling that it has forced officers to use. To understand this through a sociological perspective I will reflect upon how I think a functionalist, conflict theorist, and social interactionist would view this video. Looking at the perspectives of Functionalist I believe that these individuals would say that perceptions may define how we see people as deviant or not. Some may arguably say that certain individuals look like they fit the structural strain theory compared to others. As for a conflict theorist they would argue that officers with higher power have social control over these individuals that they are frisking. This means that officers…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard before the Court upon the Wife’s Complaint for Divorce, and the Husband’s Counter Complaint for Divorce, and the Court having scheduled a Final Hearing for June 17, 2012, and the parties and their respective counsel having appeared before the Court on said date, and the parties having established residency during the Final Hearing, and the Court being otherwise fully advised the premises finds that:…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    tape a police officer. Whether is is him/her on a phone, not wearing a seat belt, harassing…

    • 2481 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jones-Brown, D., (2010). Stop, question and frisk policing practices in New York City: A primer.…

    • 2183 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    293).” Instead many homes and neighborhoods are overly policed and constantly patrolled by members of law enforcement. Also, discriminatory policies like “Stop and Frisk” allow also police officers to question African American men and women who “look suspicious (Bump, 2016).” Lastly, African American people have had to result giving “the talk” to their children on ways to successfully navigate interactions with police. Tips like “be polite.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Injustice In The NYPD

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I do believe that NYPD's police should be required to pay civil fee's when they violate a citizen's Sacred Rights.Newyork City is a big place with thousand upon thousands of people so it is safe to say that each year in New York City , the NYPD stops and frisks thousands of individuals .During each of these stop and frisk encounters , the right of individuals to be free from arbitrary and unwarranted instructions by government authorities coincides with the duty of those agents to prevent crime and apprehend criminals. Achieving an appropriate balance between the right and the duty can present a challenge for any metropolitan police force.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Stop and Frisk” is a program put into effect by the New York Police Department that basically grants an officer authority to stop and search a “suspicious character” if they deem him/her to be as such. They don’t need a warrant, or see you commit a crime. 5They simply need to deem you “suspicious” to violate your 4th amendment rights without repercussions. Since its inception, New York City’s stop and frisk program has drawn much controversy stemming from the disproportionate rate of arrest. While the argument that the program violates an individual’s 4th amendment right of protection from unreasonable search and seizure could absolutely be made, that argument pales in comparison to the argument of discrimination. A disproportionate number of African Americans and Hispanics are unreasonably stopped and searched simply for looking suspicious. The original intention of this program was to reduce the level of crime (which it has) and to crack down on illegal weapons. It has now become an excuse for police to play with their authority and target innocent people.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    example of this is the incident that happened in North Minneapolis last month. A young black…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today around 1,400 citizens in New York City will have their constitutional rights violated through an unlawful search. The legal term for the controversial search is stop and frisk. The New York Police Department continues to pressure its officers to stop and frisk citizens, and these situations are happening at an alarmingly increasing rate. For the New York Police Department, it seems to be a game of numbers as they continue to force their officers to conduct stop and frisks through quotas (Gangi). While New York City has seen a decrease in crime over Mayor Bloomberg's term, it is difficult to directly correlate the stop and frisk policy with these decreases. This unlawful practice needs to stop as it is a controversial practice that many people believe is a direct violation of the human rights inherent for citizens. Furthermore, it could turn New York City into a police state.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stop and Frisk for Law

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The New York City Police Department (NYPD) is charged with keeping the public safe by responding to more than 100,000 emergency service (911) calls per year. In addition to responding to 911 calls, the NYPD also conduct patrols by foot and car to ensure the public’s safety. Keeping New York City (NYC) safe is a vital mission of the NYPD. Most residents that reside in NYC appreciate the efforts of the NYPD in keeping their neighborhoods safe; however in conjunction with safety the residents of NYC should trust the police that patrol their neighborhoods. This trust is called into question regarding the highly debated stop and frisk program conducted by the NYPD. Throughout the years there has been expressions of contentment and uneasiness regarding the stop and frisk program. NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg along with the NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly—and some residents of NYC—fully support the stop and frisk program and agree that it is an effective crime fighting tool and deterrent, while many…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays