In July of 2000 Curtis Williams was indicted by a grand jury in Williamson County, Texas for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. While under indictment, Williams traveled to Louisiana from Texas on a Greyhound bus. The bus Williams was traveling on was scheduled to make a stop at the Shreveport Greyhound Bus terminal on September 12,…
The issue with this case is that does it violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Which in short says that no other state has the…
In a recent ruling in 2009, Anthony M. Kennedy took part in a 6-3 ruling with other justices in the case of Wyeth v. Levine. Diane Levine filed a personal injury claim against a drug manufacturer named Wyeth, stating that because they had failed to properly label their product her arm had to be amputated. The plaintiff injected Phenergan, a drug used to prevent allergies and motion sickness into her arm. Due to complications from this injection, her arm had to be amputated. The Supreme Court of Vermont ruled in favor of the plaintiff (Ms. Levine). The court confirmed that the FDA imply provides the ground work for regulation in each state but each state is free to create stricter labeling requirements.…
Special Court Martial, Convicted in violation of Articles 86, 91, 92 of the UMCJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886,891 and 892 (1982) United States v. Collier, Jr., 27 M.J.806 (A.C.M.R. 1988),…
Is it constitutional to take away money from a person although it was gained for an interview with a publisher about one’s past crimes? Is it constitutional to take the money and give it to the victim of these past crimes? Does this or does not contradict the First Amendment which allows to express one’s mind freely with no discrimination concerning the context? The dispute over the Son of Sam law can be lead down to one question: whether speaking about crime is also a crime. Obviously, there could be two answers, one negative, and another one positive. According to the Son of Sam law, there is only one interpretation: if a…
Summary of Key Facts A. Deborah Weisman graduated from Nathan Bishop Middle School, a public…
The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of color, as well as national origin, sex, religion. This law applies to any employers with 15 or more employees including the local state, government, employment agencies, labor organizations and federal government jobs.…
Facts: William E. Story had promised his nephew, William E. Story II, $5,000 if his nephew would abstain from drinking alcohol, using tobacco, swearing, and playing cards or billiards for money until the nephew reached 21 years of age. The uncle responded to his nephew in a letter dated February 6, 1875 in which he told his nephew that he would fulfill his promise. The uncle died a couple years later without sending the money to the nephew.…
Before the supreme court case Plessy v Ferguson was put into action African Americans and caucasians had separate everything, due to racial discrimination. Plessy v Ferguson began whenever a man named Homer Plessy was arrested for sitting in a “white only” car. After going to court multiple times with this case, the supreme court set the doctrine Plessy v Ferguson in place. The doctrine stated that it was constitutional to have separate facilities for both caucasians and African Americans as long as the facilities were “equal”.…
Mendez v. Westminster (1946) was a case enacted by, “Gonzalo Mendez, William Guzman, Frank Palomino, Thomas Estrada, and Lorenzo Ramirez” who “filed suit on behalf of their fifteen…children and five thousand other minor children of ‘Mexican and Latin descent’” (Valencia, 2010, p.23). They sued Westminster school district because they were denying their children the right to enter schools near their home. The school was in California and was predominantly White and did not allow any Mexican American children to attend. Mendez claimed that the school was segregating his children, and others, based on race and kept them separate from the White Society. The “Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment played a key role in the Mendez case”…
The tort system provides compensation to individuals who have been wronged or injured by the activity of another individual. Until the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Jones v. Tsige in 2012, resulting in the creation of the tort of intrusion upon seclusion, the common law did not include torts that did not entail a personal or financial injury. It is essential the common law includes torts that do not entail actual injury to provide individuals the means of seeking remedies when they are wronged from the wrongdoer responsible for the action.…
St. Cyr, which questioned the district court?s jurisdiction under the general habeas corpus statute when dealing with illegal immigration and anti-terrorist groups. Zadvydas v. Davis, asking whether the Attorney General has the authority to arrest a removable alien after the removal period or not. Matthews vs Eldridge, dealing with an inevidentary hearing to a disabilities beneficiary being terminated violating the Due Process of the Fifth Amendment (Cornell Law, 2004).…
Plessy v. Ferguson is one of the most important and controversial cases in United States history. In 1896 the case was brought to the Supreme Court after defendant Homer Plessy was arrested for sitting on the white side of a train. Plessy who was 1/8 black was arrested and convicted of violating one of Louisiana’s racial segregation laws. The Supreme Court upheld that states were allowed to have segregated facilities for blacks and whites as long as they were “separate but equal”. There was not much support in the cases before to support the Plessy v. Ferguson case. There had been the Dred Scott Decision in 1857, which said blacks were not allowed to become citizens of the United States (later on overturned by the 14th and…
Mary and Joseph Tape were immigrants from China who now resided in the U.S. with their daughter Mamie. Despite Mamie’s clear citizenship, being born in the U.S., she was denied education at the local public school. School board members refused to place the children of Chinese immigrants within the public school system and any faculty who disobeyed this policy would be removed from their position. So, Mary and Joseph took it upon themselves to fight this prejudice with a letter addressed to the Board of Education as well as the current school superintendent. The Tape’s letter eventually found its way to the Superior Court of San Francisco, who ruled that the prejudice taken up against Mamie Tape was, in fact, unconstitutional. Following the…
student in the Topeka, Kansas school district. Every day she and her sister, Terry Lynn, had to…