Preview

Plea Bargaining

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4169 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plea Bargaining
Plea Bargaining: An Analysis of its Prospects in the Criminal Justice Administration of Bangladesh
Nadia Shabnam

ABSTRACT
One of the cardinal principles of criminal justice is that nobody is to be compelled by threat, promise or inducement in any criminal case to be a witness against themselves. As a result, it is an uphill task for the prosecution to unearth a crime, bring the witnesses in support of his case, rebut the defense arguments and prove the case beyond all reasonable doubts.These tasks become difficult for want of resources, manpower in the prosecution, and sluggishness of government officials, political interruption and importantly pervasive corruption in the criminal justice delivery process in Bangladesh. Against this backdrop,plea-bargaining can play an important role to address many of these issues.An attempt is made here to analyze the practices of plea bargaining in different regions and in different legal systems of the world. Based on experience of other countries, several recommendations are made for incorporating it in our criminal procedure.

KEY WORDS: Plea-bargaining,Trial,Criminal justice,Procedural drawbacks.

.

INTRODUCTION
Our justice sector is divided into two parts viz.formal and informal sectors.Court system is within formal sector. Article 35(3) of the Constitution of Bangladesh laysdown,"Every person accused of criminal offence shall have the right to a speedy and public trial by an independent and impartial court or tribunal established by law”. In the context of the administration of criminal justice system, it has a dual significance as because 'justice delayed is justice denied' or 'delayed justice is an infliction of injustice in the name of justice'. In our country justice is always delayed due to procedural drawbacks. So, we cannot expect a desirable outcome from this faulty delivery system. The prime reasons for these are: lengthy investigation process, outdated recording of evidence, corruption in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargains

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plea bargaining is not a useful tool. The court systems, in order to save themselves from a trial, “…forces the party into a situation where they have to take a guess about what the evidence is, about how strong the case might be, and they have to make that guess against the background of enormously severe…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plea Bargaining has become a major factor in our criminal justice system. Like all controversial topics there are many pros and cons that make it hard to decide what is right and wrong about the situation. I personally feel that plea bargaining should be abolished. Plea bargains are creating harm to our criminal justice system. Due to plea bargains the criminal justice system is being undermined and losing control of what is happening to criminals.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plea Bargaining

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Plea bargaining has been defined in a more general sense as, “the defendant’s agreement to plead guilty to a criminal charge with the reasonable expectation of receiving some consideration from the state.”…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargain

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a Frontline Program- The Plea we watched in class there were interviews of people involved in three separate cases that had involved the plea bargain. In this video a man named Charles Gampero had gotten into a fight outside of a bowling alley and walked away leaving the victim unharmed and alive. After he had left the victim had been killed, but Gampero had been charged with second degree murder and attempt to kill. The prosecutors had told Gampero that they would give him a plea of dropping the charges to manslaughter, giving him 7-21 years and that if he didn’t he would get a mandatory 25 to life. Gampero said because he was positive that he was not at fault and had left the victim unharmed he had wanted to take it to trial. In the end Gampero wound up taking the plea and not taking it to trial because the judge had scared him so much by telling him that he would get no less than 25 years if he took it to trial. If Gampero had went to trial he would have had the chance of getting less time than his 7-21 years. The judges are allowed to lie to you like they had to Gampero about getting 25 to life. Another example from this video was Patsy Kelly Jarrett. Jarrett was charged for the murder of a gas station tenant years after the murder. Jarrett was home during the time of the murder and the only evidence was someone saying that it was her. The prosecutors had given her a plea bargain of taking robbery and getting five years and later…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cjus 200 Ref. Paper 3

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are numerous legal advantages for the state in the use of plea bargaining. One may consider plea bargaining as a useful source in reducing the financial burden of criminal prosecution, improving the overall efficiency of the courts because there are fewer cases to be tried, and also allowing the prosecution to spend more time on more serious cases (Inciardi, 2010). As for the person being accused, there are also advantages which include reducing the possibility of detention during the trial process, increasing the chance of a lesser sentence, and decreasing the cost of legal aid (Inciardi, 2010).…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The police staff and other officers concerned are not satisfied with the delayed and inefficient justice system, which is against the victim (Irving and Hilgendorf 1980). The research studies conducted in order to get the opinion of police officer showed that they did not consider the deterrence to be sufficient (Jackson 2012). Instead of that, they want the provision of efficient and ample terms of punishment for the offenders on the society. The police staff complains that the evidence and other significant information collected by them against the influential offenders are ignored during the trials in the courts (Hough 2010). There is a complaint of unnecessary adjournments in the courts, which delays the final decision making of the cases. The repetitive adjournments are done in order to provide opportunity to the defendants to make their cases stronger as compared to those of the…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A plea bargain is an agreement in a criminal case where a prosecutor and a defendant arrange to end the case against the defendant before it goes to a judge or jury trial. The defendant agrees to plead guilty to a more minor offense than charged or to a smaller number of offenses than charged in exhange for a more leniant sentence or fine. Since the early 19th century, plea bargaining has played an essential part of the American criminal justice system. Research has shown that more than 90% of all felony criminal cases in urban areas of the United States are settled by plea bargain rather than by a jury trial. ("Plea Bargains: Why and When They're Made." 2002. FindLaw. 10 Mar 2004. http://criminal.findlaw.com/articles/1489.html>).…

    • 1039 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By not producing results that correlate with the outcome, plea bargaining weakens the validity of the criminal justice system. Validity or legitimacy is a very important characteristic of the legal system’s effectiveness. The view of the legal system is determined considerably on whether or not the system operates in harmony with basic rules of procedural fairness, for example treating cases alike or allowing parties an opportunity to be heard. Nevertheless, a system that fails to function under such rules will lose their…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea bargaining is being scrutinized and criticized for a variety of reasons. Many believe that plea bargaining is fair as it gives a possible offender the ability to negotiate a less severe sentence. If the offender is in fact innocent all he has to do is go trial and show it to the jury and he will be free to go. However many people are saying that plea bargaining has contributed to imprisoning of innocents and it is an unfair practice as a result. Though that may seem ludicrous because it would seem that innocent people would not willingly imprison themselves, data shows otherwise. These reasons are why plea bargaining has a negative impact and should be changed.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The ethical and legal implications involved in the plea bargain offered to Paul Hayes, was that of the prosecuting lawyer. Paul Hayes committed a criminal act that involved the possession and forging of a bad check. The defendant was offered a 5-year sentence by the prosecutor, plea bargain, in exchange for a guilty plea for the crime committed. If Mr. Hayes did not accept the plea bargain offered, then the prosecutor would charge Mr. Hayes as a habitual felon under the Kentucky’s three-strike law. Being that Mr. Hayes has two prior felony charges, the Habitual Criminal Act would include the maximum sentence of life in prison. The prosecutor did not receive a guilty plea from Mr. Hayes. As a result, Mr. Hayes was sentenced to life in prison because of his decision to have his case heard by a jury.…

    • 344 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plea Bargain

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though the Supreme Court has endorsed plea bargaining, the public sometimes views it suspiciously. Law and order advocates, who generally favor harsh punishments and long jail terms, claim that plea bargaining results in unjustifiably light sentences. As a consequence, prosecutors who regularly engage in the practice rarely advertise it. Plea bargaining can be a powerful prosecutorial tool, but this power carries with it the potential for musses. Because they circumvent the trial process, plea bargains can be abused by prosecutors and defense attorneys who are more interested in the speedy resolution of cases than they are in seeing justice done.Carried to the extreme, plea bargaining may result in defendants being convicted of crimes they did not commit. Although it is rare, innocent defendants who think a jury will convict them for whatever reason may plead guilty to reduced charges to avoid a trial.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea bargaining not only serves a purpose in our criminal justice system; it has become a vital part of it. The significance of plea bargaining can be overlooked because of the implications of the wording. The term “plea bargain” sometimes implies a misnomer in the fact that it leads one to believe those who accept a plea bargain are getting off easy which in many cases is not true. In many cases, plea bargains prove to be the most efficient method of invoking justice on criminals (Bohm & Haley, 2011).…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The plea bargaining process is very important to the criminal justice system because without it the criminal justice system would grind to a halt. Plea-bargaining is important because if every case went to a trial it would take years for criminals to get from the time of arrest till the time of trial. The video we saw showed an example of how the process works to get criminals who plea guilty to committing minor crimes through the system faster so that the courts can concentrate on those criminals who commit major crimes. In this video you can see some of the variables that enter into the plea-bargaining system and how they can be fair and unfair to the parties involved. You can see the quality of legal representation…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No matter the severity of the case, plea bargaining is relied on heavily in the United States. Many people see this as controversial and disrespectful to the victims and their families; just as many people see this as a necessary tool for justice to be served. With our criminal justice system relying so heavily on plea bargaining, we have to ask ourselves a few questions: is the verdict of these cases better for the victim or the criminal; does this institution we call plea bargaining give the ability for justice to be served or does the crime get diluted and become justice…

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea-Bargaining originally started in the early part of the nineteenth century with the violation of liquor laws. It is one of many issues viewed in the criminal justice system. It may or may not be beneficial to the accused person allowing them a lighter sentence. This paper will discuss definition of plea bargaining, distinguish between charge bargaining and sentence bargaining, compare and contrast the pros and cons associated with the use of plea bargains, and describing how plea bargaining reflects or thwarts the crime control and due process models of criminal justice.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays