Preview

Plato and Socrates Place Rulers

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
310 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato and Socrates Place Rulers
Describe Socrates’ reasons (in the Crito), for refusing to escape from prison.

In the text Crito, is compose of the Socrates’ and Crito’s dialogues whether escaping from the prison or not. Because of the corrupting youth Socrates sentenced to death. By ask questions Socrates made people questioned their belief. Therefore Socrates called as ‘god fly’. After all these cases Crito try to convince Socrates to escape from the prison. However Socrates does not want to escape.
According to Socrates’ view point one should never do wrong in return nor do any man harm, no matter what he may have done to you. Condemning Socrates to death can be wrongdoing but if Socrates escapes from the prison in return he will continue this wrongdoing. Therefore he does not want to escape.
Additionally, he thinks that he choose to live in Athen therefore he responsible to gratitude the laws. It is the first reason of Socrates to stay in jail. I think he believes the tacit agreement as a social contract.
Secondly Socrates does not trust the other cities. Because there is no certain better life outside of Athen not only for him but also his family. Socrates worried about that therefore it is one of the reasons to stay in jail.
Thirdly he thinks about his reputation. He claims that if he escapes then the crime would be accepted. Because people think that if Socrates is innocent then why he escapes. Since Socrates thinks in this way, he refuses to escape.
The other point is about his friends and family. He states that his friends and family may be harmed if he escapes. In order to learn Socrates’ place rulers can put pressure on his family.
Lastly and interestingly he thinks that it is God’s will.
When all reasons are considered Socrates has lots of reasons to stay in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato's Crito Worksheet

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. In paragraphs 43-46a, Crito gives Socrates a number of reasons why he should escape. State one of them in your own words. He will be killed un-honorably.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crito

    • 638 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crito offers Socrates to escape prison and run away to another city, because he says it will be painful for him to lose such a good friend this way and that there are many people waiting to help, and also that they will be disappointed if he didn’t escape. Socrates says he is worried that if he escapes Crito and his companions will be in danger. Crito says it is easy to bribe them because he and his friends have enough money.…

    • 638 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Crito, Plato introduces several arguments that Socrates makes on whether or not it would be just for him to escape from prison when the Athenians have not acquitted him. Socrates begins by arguing that one must never do wrong. One of the most compelling arguments that he goes on to make is that doing harm to someone is wrong and therefore one must never engage in retaliatory harm. Under certain circumstances, such as self-defense, retaliatory harm is necessary. Socrates also argues that whenever you violate an agreement, you harm the person you made the agreement with. Therefore, escaping is wrong. In this paper, I shall argue that although the arguments support…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    But on the other hand this choice has to be made "on attaining manhood". If the individual decides to stay and live there then he is automatically participating in the law making process and he engages in the "political association" (The Politics). In conclusion he must completely obey any decision the state makes concerning him even if this decision involves his death. He continues and states that if he would escape, the city and its laws could be destroyed. The judicial system would have no more power because the people will stop trusting the system. Chaos would be the imminent outcome. Therefore we get to another minor premise that states that destroying Athens laws will hurt its citizens. Committing an act that could harm other people is against Socrates premise of living well. By harming other people you destroy your own character and conscience. According to Socrates life is not worth living with a ruined conscience the same as it is not worth living "with a body which is worn out and ruined in health"…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that these laws has given him birth, have educated him, raised him and have shared the wealth of Athens with him. Socrates thinks that the people of Athens are free to leave if they find the laws unjust, but if they want to stay then they must abide by the laws of Athens. The only thing that he points out are the people in power. He thinks that the people who are in power have changed the original laws for their own benefit. “been wronged, not by the Laws, but by men” (p 54). Socrates accepts death penalty because he wants the laws should be remain in place. Given opportunities such as exile or apology, he argues that if he escape from the prison, it will destroy the laws of the city and, eventually, the city because according to Socrates no city can survive without its laws being enforced. Therefore, Socrates steadfast by his believes of not violating any…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Crito warns Socrates that if he dies he will not be able to educate his sons, and that his friends will be miserable without him, but Socrates is still not persuaded. Crito cautions that Socrates is “betraying [his] sons by going away and leaving them, when [he] could bring them up and educate them” (Crito 40), and while Socrates does not want to abandon his sons, towards the end of the discussion he realizes that even exiled he cannot be there to help them. Socrates predicts the response of the city if he chooses exile, foreseeing a response along the lines of “consider what good you will do yourself or your friends by breaking our agreements and committing such a wrong. It is pretty obvious that your friends will themselves be in danger of exile, disfranchisement and loss of property” (Crito 45). Socrates does not want to endanger anyone in order to live, largely because he ruled his death as the will of the God’s and embraced it. Here Socrates’ dedication to the laws is apparent, as he chooses to abide by the state laws even though that involves parting from his family and friends. Few would abandon what they had on earth for the state today, thus this devotion to the law is remarkable and incredibly…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since Athenians were so close minded, they out casted anyone that didn't conform to their traditions. They should have been open to anything and not simply dislike a person or a situation because it didn’t follow their ideals. Socrates’ trial eventually led to his death and this illustrates that everyone has limitations. We can’t reject what we were taught or certain laws in society just because we don’t agree. Society functions because we work together and change together not because we do what we want. Furthermore, when Socrates was on trial he made a point to say that the democracy was poison to the people. Yet when his friend Crito offers him an escape from his death he denies the offer because he believes it is unjust to not face his execution. There are many theories behind why Socrates said no since he didn’t support the democracy; I believe it is because he had an open mind. (Crito,76-77). Yes, him being open-minded lead to his death; however, it indicates that he understood limitations of the law and respected societies perspectives.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Crito3, Socrates argues why he is not going to escape death, even though he has the means to. In order to do so, he invokes ‘the laws’ — a personified ideal form that questions him: “Tell us, Socrates, … are you going by an act of yours to overturn us — the laws and the whole State? Do you imagine that a State can subsist and not be overthrown, in which the decisions of law have no power, but are set aside and…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Vs Crito

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the reading CRITO the verdict of execution has already been given and now Socrates and colleagues must make the decision to flee the city of Athens or stay and face his fate. In this conversation you have Critos point of view and Socrates. Based on Critos reasoning he states three reasons why Socrates should stay, the first two being selfish but the third hitting home.…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Unjust

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This establishes that whether or not Socrates originally believes his punishment is right, by staying in Athens his entire life, he made a commitment to follow the law-being just-therefore, if he is accused of breaking the law and is convicted by the courts of Athens, which represent the law, then he must complete his sentence, or else he is only becoming more unjust. Socrates later decides that although he could escape, it is better to try and do the right thing, despite having done unjust things in the past, and ultimately decides to carry out his punishment. This passage also further examines the gray area within the idea of just and unjust by saying that following the laws is just; however, the people of the court who determine which acts are within the bounds the laws and which acts are not, are also biased according to their own personal perceptions, meaning no human truly knows the intransigent definitions of what is just and what is unjust.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, Crito shows some of his arguments why Socrates should escape. First, If he dies he will leaves his 3 children and family. Second, If Socrates dies, Crito will lose close friend. Third, If Crito will not save him, this will be a big shame for his reputation . On the one hand, among his friends, because it will seems that Crito did not his best to save him. On the other hand among the people in Athens just because they expect it to happen and the opinion of majority still matter. Therefore, If Crito will not save Socrates, the people will think that he does not want to do it and does not want to spend money for him.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many people question why Socrates would chose a death sentence for himself. Socrates could very easily have fled the city and went into exile instead of drinking the hemlock that would kill him. Socrates was a proud man and truly believed that he was innocent of what he was being charged with. He was a law abiding citizen, and by running away into exile, he would be destroying the law. He had a respect for the city, and felt that running away would show a great disrespect. Socrates states ,”Reflect now, Socrates,” the laws may say, “that if what we say is true, you are not treating us rightly by planning to do what you are planning. We have given you birth, nurtured you, educated you; we have given you and all other citizens a share of all the good things we could.”(Crito 54) He had been a citizen of Athens for seventy years, which meant he followed the Athenian laws. He also had concerns for his family. If he were considered an outlaw, they may suffer some repercussions. If he were to break the law, he would be considered an outlaw, and I think that was against everything Socrates stood for. When first reading of Socrates and his fate, I questioned why he would not choose to escape into exile. After reading further into…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that this "act" really exposes Socrates as a coward and a fool. Firstly I call him a coward, because to me he is to shame to admit that he could possibly wrong. He makes absolutely ridiculous points in trying to defend his actions. He came up with a totally hypothetical situation in which he gets caught by the guards, and he came to the conclusion, that by escaping he would be disobeying his parents, also those who brought him up. My problem with his conclusion, is that he spent a lot of his life disobeying and questioning everything he was thought, without any fear and all of a sudden he's afraid of the consequences of being caught, and he already has been sentenced to the ultimate penalty, death.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court just offered him the plea deal, to walk away and not teach philosophy again and he can live, otherwise it will be death, and Socrates responds to this plea deal. “Well, as I just said, if you were to let me go on these terms, I’d reply to you, ‘I’ve the upmost respect and affection for you, men of Athens, but I’ll obey the god rather than you, and as long as I draw breath and am able, I won’t give up practicing philosophy’” (29d). Socrates explains to the court that he won’t accept that deal, and would rather die than not be able to practice philosophy, and he is very content with his answer. Socrates fears not death, but living a life in which he can’t practice philosophy, a life with no meaning, no goal or mission, an unexamined life. This unexamined life is a bad life, you should be able to learn about life, and understand things for why not just because some “expert” told you that it was a certain way just because. The life that Socrates lives is virtuous, he is more about gaining knowledge than gaining money and power. He also cares more about his relationships, relationships in which both he and the people he connects with make a difference on each other, and they are not just meaningless. Socrates believes what he does so much, that he would die for it, rather than live without it.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays