Preview

Plato and Aristotle's Theories about Soul and Body

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
369 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato and Aristotle's Theories about Soul and Body
Plato and Aristotle are two Greek philosophers that were concerned about the nature of soul and its relationship to the body. Their theories about soul and body have some points of similarity and some points of contrast.This essay discuss the fundamentally different views of Plato and Aristotle on the nature of soul.
Both Plato and Aristotle viewed the soul and body as two things. Whereas Plato saw the body to be material and the soul to be spiritual, Aristotle saw body and soul as equally important.
Plato explained how he regarded the nature of the soul in this Quote: “[T]he soul is in the very likeness of the divine, and immortal, and intellectual, and uniform, and indissoluble, and unchangeable “
Plato believed that this world is a replication of the real world. He believed on the existence of a world of essences where the essence of everything physical is to be found. Essentially, he believed on “duality” in the relationship between soul and body. The soul for Plato is immortal, divine, pure, unchanging and being, where the body is mortal, changing and becoming. Plato saw death as a kind of release from the prison of material world to the world of perfection, where the soul carries on without the body that decays and dies.
On the other hand, Aristotle regarded soul as the fulfilling purpose of the body. “If we are to speak of something common to every soul, it will be the first actuality of a natural body which has organs.” Aristotle.
Aristotle did not believe in the world of essences and cared more about the material world. For Aristotle the relationship between soul and body is a definitional Unity. His explanation to this relationship was that the soul needs the body like a sight needs an eye. Aristotle saw body and soul as inseparable. For Aristotle, when the body dies, the soul has nothing to support it; therefore, the soul cannot exist without body. According to Aristotle, the soul and body can be seen as exercise and capacity, form and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However philosophers such as Aristotle (a pupil of Plato’s) argue that the body and soul are dependant of each other and that one cannot survive without the other. Aristotle believed the soul is the form, like the characteristics of a sculpture. He talks about how the soul is merely description of the essence or properties of the body. It is our human personality and abilities. Aristotle believed that the soul was inseparable to the body and that it cannot be divided. The soul is said to be essential to us, we are body and soul. Aristotle used the example of…

    • 698 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was a dualist and so believed that human beings consisted of two parts- body and soul. This view is portrayed throughout Plato’s famous theory of the Forms of which he suggests that true substances are not physical bodies, but are the eternal Forms that our bodies are merely the imperfect copy. In his Theory he tells of a World of Forms representing knowledge, which he also names the ‘real’ world and the world of Particulars signifying opinions, the world in which we live in. The Forms come from a world of perfection which are illuminated by the Form of the Good which is at the top of the hierarchy and is the source of which the other Forms stemmed from.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle had viewed the self/psyche as inseparable from the body, as the form and the…

    • 335 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two of the greatest and earliest thinkers of our time are Plato, and his most famous pupil, Aristotle. Soon after Plato’s teachings, Aristotle criticized his claims and independently became a thinker on his own. These philosophers viewed metaphysics differently, and they approached the idea of reality in two opposing ways. Plato’s Theory of Forms was a concept that was defined in a different way by Aristotle. They both believed in “forms” but approached this idea differently.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato believes that not only do souls exist but they are also independent of the body with their own agenda to be carried out beyond that of the host. Melinda…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s thoughts tended to believe in two levels of reality. Plato held that metaphysics is dualistic: he proposed that there are two different kinds of things - physical and mental. There is what appears real and what is real. Plato believed that everything real takes on a form but doesn't embody that form. on the other hand, Aristotle’s beliefs lead to him seeing only one level of reality. He felt there was only one imminent world and that forms existed within particular things. Aristotle held that form had no separate existence and existed in matter. in nature, we never find matter without form or form without matter. substance is always a composition of form and matter.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato suggests that the soul is distinct from the body. The soul is immortal whereas the body is mortal. At the end of life the soul is set free from the body. Plato writes that a human person is a soul ‘imprisoned’ in a body. For Plato the goal of the soul is the world of Forms, which can only be seen indirectly in the physical world.…

    • 1978 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato looked for a universal reality, or concept that made an object what it was. For example, a pizza is round. The roundness was an eternal concept . The physical pizza being round was temporary, it would not always be round. If you ate a slice it would no longer be round or if you dropped it and the slices became disorganized, it would no longer be round. But the sponsoring concept of round would always be round. The concept was eternal. It was a form and forms never change. Physical objects were a crude and inadequate representation of their form. To Plato, to understand his theory of forms one must transcend the physical world by going beyond the senses to get to a higher reality where true concepts existed. In this higher reality, roundness (truth) is unchanging. When one reaches this true reality, one then has knowledge and wisdom. He felt that very few people were willing or able to transcend to this higher reality because the human condition was a trap that distracted the mind from truth. He theorized that forms were eternal and one must have forms to gain knowledge and to do that you must disengage from this world to discover an objects form.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato takes a dualist view and therefore believes that a disembodied existence is entirely possible and the soul is distinct from the body. At our death, the soul is set free from the body where it has been ‘imprisoned’ and it is now able to achieve its ultimate goal and reach the world of the forms. The soul is the only immortal part of the body and survived the world of the forms before it came entrapped in the body, thus when we learn we are simply recalling what our soul knew before. Plato holds a negative view of the body as it distracts the soul from seeking the forms with its trivial worldly desires such as sex. If we want to be true philosophers we need to avoid distractions and concentrate on gaining knowledge of the forms. In order to further explain this Plato uses the chariot analogy in which the mind and body are out of control horses and the soul is being driven by the in the chariot so needs to reign them in and control them. The soul outside of the body is simple and without parts yet the soul inside the body is complex and has different aspects such as reason, spirit and desire. Peter Geach disagreed with Plato and questioned what is can mean for the disembodied soul to see the forms, given that seeing is a process linked to the body and the bodies’ senses.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle was a student of Plato’s and teacher of Alexander the Great. He created his own school in 335 B.C. in Athens. He thought of metaphysics to be the first philosophy which formed a part of Aristotle’s interests. Aristotle’s stated that forms are universal. He created main ideas that included categories of reason, syllogism, conceptualism, accidental vs. essential properties, the four causes, hierarchy of being, the unmoved mover and types of reasoning/knowledge. According to Aristotle, notion of Essential properties makes something what it is, and accidental properties are the differences of that item. For example, there are many different types of paper, there are small, big, pink, black, white, yellow etc. but they are still considered paper and this is what it makes it an accidental property. Aristotle’s believed that each thing is maintained of a mixture of both matter and form. By forms he meant essential conception of a thing and its…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The shorthand way of describing Aristotle's view of the soul and its relationship to the body, is to say that the soul of an axe is cutting, the soul of an eye is seeing, and the soul of a man is thinking. In other words, everything has a form or an essence, which is shown in its primary activity. The soul is what makes a thing what it is.…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Protocol Paper

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages

    • Even as early as Greek thought, including Socrates, people have thought about the idea of a human soul (or ego, self, etc.). But what this soul really is or if it really exists is much harder to answer. Socrates argued that the soul is too simple to destroy; unlike other things (i.e. a shirt that can be ripped up into numerous pieces of said material), he thought that the soul was already at its simplest form; he thought the soul was indestructible. Modern science however, disagrees with the idea of a human soul. Modern science sees two issues with this idea- the brain and consciousness. The soul is not tangible, whereas modern science has proven that without the brain, the body will seize to function, and…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Platos Tripartite Soul

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages

    As a philosophical treatise, it is to be commended for appreciating the complexity of human motivations, however given our contemporary biological knowledge we can see that the simplified composition of the ‘soul’ espoused by Plato may be untenable. Also, by virtue of the soul being a conglomerate of three distinct forces, this raises philosophical issues regarding the soul’s immortality (that has been and is still affirmed by the author).…

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato Vs Buddhism Essay

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Throughout history, there has been a variety of opinions and theories regarding the body and the soul. The two most common known philosophies regarding the body and the soul are Plato’s theories and Buddhism. Each have their own ways of viewing how the body and the soul connect to each other and how they function during a life. Buddhism, an old eastern religion that believes in no monotheistic creator and reincarnation. Buddhist’s also have their own notion that creates a connection between the soul and the body. Despite the differences between the two philosophies, I will argue that there are greater similarities between Plato’s and Buddhism’s notions of the soul. Throughout this essay, the ideas of parallel interpretations of the soul, individual…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Xoxo

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages

    But this meant that Aristotle also rejected Plato's separation of the human soul from the body, and Aristotle, unlike Plato, saw human beings entirely as creatures of nature, "rational animals"-- but still animals. Metaphysics, for Aristotle, was not the study of another world, recollected in our eternal souls; metaphysics was simply the study of nature (physics), and, as importantly, the study of ourselves.…

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays