Preview

Plato's Theory of Justice

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
902 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato's Theory of Justice
In Plato’s Republic he defines justice as “doing one’s own work and not meddling with what is not one’s own” (Plato 139, 433b). This definition begs the question what is one’s own work? Plato states that one’s own work is the work that one’s nature is best suited for, as each person is born with a different nature (Plato 101, 370b). To come to this definition Plato compares justice within the human soul to justice within a city. If Plato can find justice within the city and prove that the individual is only a smaller version of the city then he will have found the form of justice, the aspect by which we recognize justice in anything else.
In Book II of Republic Plato constructs a city from scratch because he claims that it is much easier to find justice in a city, than to try and look for it in a single man (Plato 100, 368d). In this city he places a variety of different craftsmen (Plato 100-103, 369d-371e), which correspond with the appetitive element of the soul, auxiliaries to guard the city, corresponding to the spirited element, and guardians to rule over the city, as the reason rules over the soul (Plato 104, 374e). Plato proposes that each person within his city has a defined role, based upon his or her nature, because a city benefits more “if each person does one thing for which he is naturally suited” (Plato 101, 370c) as opposed to performing many different roles. This is similar to how he defines that each element of a person’s soul has its own task for which it is naturally suited. In defining this Plato asserts that each person is happiest performing his or her naturally defined role and that in doing so they would make the whole city as happy as possible (Plato 130, 420b-c). After Plato finishes defining his city and the roles of each of its three classes he is now free to attempt to find justice within his city. He does this in Book IV by first finding three other virtues, wisdom, courage and temperance, allowing that what is left in the



Cited: Plato. "Republic." Classics of Moral and Political Theory Fourth Edition. Ed. Michael L. Morgan. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1992.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In many societies, including our own, we labeled the meaning of the word “justice” for the sole purpose of maintaining social and political stability and order for the good of many instead of the few. However, what we believe to be just and unjust in regards to what Plato’s Republic explains about what is actually just and unjust are inadvertently blurred from a somewhat conflicting (if not unintended biased) perspective. These concepts of thought originate in a hierarchical group of knowledge: understanding, thought, belief, and imagination (Socrates 511e); most of which we use for measuring the ideal implementation of practical and critical forms of theory. What we portray justice in the United States today mostly consists of both opinionated…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is justice? Today, where it is common for people to only look out for themselves, justice is an extremely important tool. But what exactly is justice? What is right, what is wrong, and who decides that? To find an accurate definition, we as a society should not just focus on one opinion, but the views of many. Similar to how our society is today, the society in The Republic, lived the same, struggling to determine what the correct definition of justice was, and how to pursue the right answer. In the paper, I will be discussing all aspects of Plato’s Republic, including the Philosopher King and his nature, and justice in that time.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was an interesting individual, and has always been one of my favorite Philosophers. I personally like most of his political ideals, and find them almost in alignment with my own. In particular I like his reasoning when it comes to the citizens that make up the city-state, along with the leadership. So throughout this essay I plan on drawing from the Republic to talk more about this Philosopher’s ideas.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a man was not subjected to law or punishment would he choose to do what is considered just? In Plato’s The Republic, Glaucon, one of Socrates’ students, states a common view on justice. Justice is simply a lesser evil when compared to the two extremes which are suffering injustice without power to retaliate and doing injustice without suffering consequences. According to Glaucon, all men are inherently unjust, and only do what is just when forced to do so by law. This view of justice can be seen throughout history when leaders, like Nero, do unjust actions for their own personal gain simply because they are free from any consequences.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle, Aquinas, Plato, and Kant all have different definitions of what justice is. Aristotle believes that justice is something that is absolute but it also depends on the motives. He also believed that there are different kinds of justice. These different kinds of justice include punishment and exchange. Aristotle thought that the punishment should fit the crime. He also thought that exchange should be equal for services. Aquinas believes that justice is based off of what is the best for the common good. He also thought that justice is the difference between good and bad. This difference leads to the idea of justice being the most basic virtue. Plato believes that justice is balance. Justice, according to Plato, is avoiding chaos and keeping harmony in ones conscience. Kant believes that justice is based on our maxims. When being just, Kant believes that it is our duty to be truthful, preserve life, and develop or acknowledge our talents. Our society is not necessarily the most just society. There are many issues of inequality through out our communities and nationally.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his philosophy, Plato places a large emphasis on the importance of the idea of justice. This emphasis can be seen especially in his work ‘The Republic’ where, through his main character Socrates, he attempts to define the nature of justice and to justify this definition. One of the methods used by Socrates to strengthen or rather explain his argument on justice is through his famous city-soul analogy, where a comparison between a just city and a just soul/individual is made. Through this analogy, Socrates attempts to explain the nature of justice, how it is the virtue of the soul and is therefore intrinsically valuable to the individual, but it becomes apparent in the analysis and evaluation of the analogy that there may have been several purposes behind it. Inconsistencies within the analogy itself also raise questions to the validity in Plato’s definition and justification of justice.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates meets with some of his friends and begins discussing the meaning of justice and whether the just life is better than the unjust life. First, they contemplate the meaning of justice. Cephalus stated that justice is as simple as telling the truth and returning what you receive, Polemarchus stated that justice is giving each his due, and Thrasymachus stated that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates proves each of them wrong and embarks on a discussion to find out what true justice is, and to find out whether the just man is truly happier than the unjust man, or vice versa.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    [ 2 ]. Plato. The Republic of Plato. 2 Sub ed. New York: Basic Books, 1968.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s theory of justice is about equality and that one deserves punishment if they do commit an unjust action. During the Crito, Socrates tries to correct a lot of points that Crito is trying to argue with him about, what it means to be justice. To be justice, means a human being that does good based on the laws that are emplaced according to the state. Good people according to Socrates are only worth considering. People that do good are considered moral people, and have opinions that should be regarded because their inputs are considered to be ethically correct. Being a human of ethical virtues means that they must not do wrong. Anything that is immoral, is considered immoral. We as humans may not intervene in activities that deem to be…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At this point returning debts owed and helping friends while harming enemies are all definitions of justice that Socrates show to be inadequate and lack of complexity. In the dialogue Plato then…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato's Republic Argument

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this essay, I will attempt to evaluate the text of James Butler’s Justice and the Fundamental Question of Plato’s “Republic,” and analyze his position. The article was aimed at proving that Plato’s Republic is grounded within the ideals that justice is welcomed for its own sake, indicating that the act of justice is done as an end in itself rather than to achieve some other purpose and that justice there unfolds the highest degree of happiness in one’s life. It draws attention to proving that the Republic should be studied as being thoroughly eudaimonistic. Since reading the article, I can confirm that I stand convinced by Butler’s claim in the intentions of the “Republic.” As I absorbed his thoroughly explained and persuasive arguments,…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most complex foundations of our society is justice, which has always been overlooked without much thought. According to Thrasymachus, in Plato’s The Republic, who breaks irately into the discussion, proclaims that he has a superior meaning of justice to offer. Justice, he says, is simply the point of interest of the stronger. In spite of the fact that Thrasymachus claims that this is his definition, it is not so much implied as a meaning of justice as much as it is a delegitimization of justice. He is stating that it doesn't pay to be just.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Plato. Republic. Trans. G. M. A. Grube. Rev. C. D.C Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub., 1992. Print.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Plato, individual justice mirrors political justice. He discusses the tri-partite soul in his Republic. The tri-partite soul consists of three parts: the rational, the spirited and the appetitive. The rational part of the soul searches after the truth. The spirited part desires honor and is responsible for our feelings of anger and indignation. The appetitive part is lust, especially for money. Justice in the individual is analogous to justice in the society. An individual is just when the three parts of his soul are fulfilling their intended roles. The rational part rules the soul, the spirited part supports the rule of the rational…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Justice

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is justice? Well, many seem to think that they know the answer to this. No one had a better understanding of what justice was and what constituted a just life than Plato and Socrates. After reading his famous book, The Republic, it left me confused, yet well educated on what Plato thought was justice. Philosophers say this book could possibly be the single most important philosophical books of Western Tradition. Plato believed that there is more need for abstract thought than concrete thought. He proposes that there were two worlds the real world and the world of ideas (forms). Justice could mean many different things to many different people. Although philosophers are more recognizable with the workings of a city than a soul, they tried to define justice by creating the ideal city which they named Kallipolis. In this ideal city, the philosophers believed that each citizen will do the task that is best suited to him or her. Socrates then examines these various tasks and is able to separate them into three distinct groups: those which produce something for the city, those which protect the city from both internal and external subversion, and those which provide control and direct the other two groups.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays