Preview

Plato's and Aristotle's Worldviews

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
505 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato's and Aristotle's Worldviews
Angela Antoine
7-03-2011
PHI 103 Intro to Philosophy and Ethics
Professor Ted Rueter

Plato’s and Aristotle’s Worldviews
|Worldview Belief |Metaphysics |Epistemology |Ethics |Anthropology |God |

|Plato |Dual realities. The lower |Knowledge is gained only by |If a human possesses a virtuous |Dual parts. The body and soul |The Form of the Good. If the |
| |physical world and the upper |reason and then only as human |character, their conduct will be|are separate |Form of the Good did not exist, |
| |world of the Forms. |reason understands the Forms. |morally acceptable. | |nothing else would exist. |
|Aristotle |Every being, except God, is a |Reason and sensation are |Moral virtue is stable states of|Both body and soul are essential|Pure actuality. Form without |
| |composite of form and matter. |integral parts of the knowing |the soul which enable a person |parts of a human being and are |matter. An unchanging being who|
| | |process. |to make right decisions about |connected. |is the ultimate cause of |
| | | |how to act. | |everything that exists. |

Plato Plato opposed hedonism because he did not believe that pleasure was the highest good. He recognized that some pleasures were evil. His ethics were that if a human being possessed a virtuous character, their conduct will be morally acceptable.



References: Nash, R. H. (1999). Life’s ultimate questions: An introduction to philosophy. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plato was a dualist and so believed that human beings consisted of two parts- body and soul. This view is portrayed throughout Plato’s famous theory of the Forms of which he suggests that true substances are not physical bodies, but are the eternal Forms that our bodies are merely the imperfect copy. In his Theory he tells of a World of Forms representing knowledge, which he also names the ‘real’ world and the world of Particulars signifying opinions, the world in which we live in. The Forms come from a world of perfection which are illuminated by the Form of the Good which is at the top of the hierarchy and is the source of which the other Forms stemmed from.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with Plato's objections stated above, however not to the degree where what is…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be discussing the view on the forms, of both Plato and Aristotle. For starts, Plato’s views on the Forms are basically describing the true meaning about material objects in the world. Like for example viewing a desk in a class room, should be looked at as more than just what we see, but thousands of atoms put together to make it look like a desk or something like that. His idea of an object was defined by what we might think something is it’s basically a form of something else. He said that we could be sitting on a chair but its quality is of an object which form is that of a chair. This idea of the form by Plato exists in a heavenly realm that could be understood by the mind. Plato’s views on the forms were aspects of everyday life, anything from a table to a bench As well as ideas and emotions. The essence of Plato's theory of Ideas Forms lay in the conscious recognition of the fact that there is a class of entities, in which the best name is probably universal, that are entirely different from sensible things, which is interesting. Plato's theory of Forms assumed that Forms are universal and exist as substances. On the other hand, Aristotle firmly disagrees with the idea of Forms being universal.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Paper PHL Kloke

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato considered the soul ‘to be the immortal essence of the person’ and to house three individual parts- Reason, Emotion, and Desire (Jowett, 2007). While the soul…

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One thing I can say that is of complex to me somewhat is the idea of the philosophical term form, in which something is just that and not subjected to change. I get the meaning of it by how it is something that is the exact reality of something, but what I don’t get is the understanding. I have questions like is that something we are to look forward to when we die; the exact form of something? Would we be actually satisfied with this result? I can’t help but wonder what how these forms are going to affect us when we are in another world where our true form is shown.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Fifth Edition. John Perry, Michael Bratman, John Martin Fischer. Oxford University Press. 2010. )…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Price Gouging

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In his book “Nicomachean Ethics” Aristotle invited the reader to give an explanation of what he believed is good.…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    |Existence |Making or actions conform to our |Thought, Appearance and reality |Substance and accidents, Matter|…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The highest goal in all of education, Plato believed, is knowledge of the Good; that is, not merely an awareness of particular benefits and pleasures, but acquaintance with the Form itself. Just as the sun provides illumination by means of which we are able to perceive everything in the visual world, he argued, so the Form of the Good provides the ultimate standard by means of which we can apprehend the reality of everything that has value. Objects are worthwhile to the extent that they participate in this crucial…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    evil, selfish and negative human sentiment) is in direct contradiction and opposition to events and things which are conducive – and thus constructively positive – to the overall welfare and state of the human condition. With these terms in consideration, I additionally argue, on the given grounds that God can be conceived to exist as the perfect and composite whole of all manifestations of physical and metaphysical being within universal existence, as well as perfectly existing of and within the parameters of physical spacetime and equitable, albeit intangible metaphysical constituents5, is thus is the ultimate equivalent and reflection of the ideal of eternal truth6. Thus, essentially, ignorance is temporally reflective of the ideal of absolute evil because of the notion that absolute evil stands in direct opposition to the will of God, destiny, and the course of positive or otherwise progressively constructive human events, as well as the soul’s desires7. Finally, to reiterate the essential and obvious point: Absolute, deliberate ignorance is the equivalent of absolute evil, in opposition to the will of God and the…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Golden Age Of Athens Summary

    • 4504 Words
    • 19 Pages

    -Theory of knowledge: true objects = nature (everything around us), use deductive and inductive reasoning, use observation and the five senses…

    • 4504 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For Aristotle, moral virtue is the only practical road to effective action. What the person of good character loves with right desire and thinks of as an end with right reason must first be perceived as beautiful. Hence, the virtuous person sees truly and judges rightly, since beautiful things appear as they truly are only to a person of good character. It is only in the middle ground between habits of acting and principles of action that the soul can allow right desire and right reason to make their appearance, as the direct and natural response of a free human being to the sight of the…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper examines whether inferior and superior people can be friends based on complete friendship according to Aristotle. First, I will clarify the definition of a complete friendship and what it entails. Secondly, I will explain the different types of equal and unequal friendships in accordance with complete friendship. Then I will show how different levels of affection follow the forms of inequality and how a sort of equality can arise owing to proper reciprocal affections. Thirdly, I will explain the different sorts of superiority and inferiority concerning friendships, where the parties are unequal and the ratio or proportion of affection must thus be equalized. These sorts will then be linked to the attributes of complete friendship. Finally, through Aristotle’s distinctions of equality, inequality, superiority, inferiority and complete friendship, I will conclude by discussing whether inferior and superior people can truly be complete friends.…

    • 2321 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    to plants, holds the opinion that there is both decency and infamy in man. His…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    percolation of the original purity of man and non-duality against essential human depravity. This paper…

    • 3338 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays