Planned Parenthood Analysis
Planned Parenthood is an Essential Part of Health Care for Young Adults
“Abortions represent 3% of total services provided by Planned Parenthood” (Robertson). Yet why is there such a huge controversy over the need to defund this corporation that provides health care to thousands of young adults around the nation? There are many arguments as to why Planned Parenthood should be defunded, including the claim that, “Planned Parenthood is illegally trafficking human body parts” (Roys). Despite the repeated blows towards this health institution, there are also justifiable reasons as to why Planned Parenthood is a beneficial establishment for young adults searching for affordable health care. Furthermore, there are also numerous religious groups …show more content…
Specifically, in 2013, Planned Parenthood provided services to 2.7 million patients. Of which included prenatal care, which was administered to over 18,684 people (Goldschmidt). The various types of services that are provided consist of sexually transmitted disease testing and treatment, contraception, cancer screening and prevention, including the least provided service by the health institution of which were abortions (Robertson). Although many people may not agree with the idea of abortion or the actual process of it, without Planned Parenthood there would be drastic consequences from removing this health care option. Granted there are equal arguments for both sides debating over whether Planned Parenthood should be defunded, I believe that this health institution is more beneficial than harmful. After Sanger established Planned Parenthood in 1916, the nonprofit organization has been providing …show more content…
Which out of these services, only three percent were from providing abortions. The majority of Planned Parenthood funding helps with testing and treating sexually transmitted diseases and infections, and the other main use of funding goes to providing contraception to those who are sexually active (Robertson). Henceforth comes the question, if the majority of Planned Parenthood services don’t provide abortions, then why is there such an immense outrage against this health care provider? Another point of interest is that Planned Parenthood cannot legally use the federal government’s funding to pay for abortions. (Robertson) If this is the case, then the outraged protestors should not be worried about the government spending all of its income to just throw away for an abortion. There are several more beneficial aspects from Planned Parenthood, but these are just a summary of the main
“Abortions represent 3% of total services provided by Planned Parenthood” (Robertson). Yet why is there such a huge controversy over the need to defund this corporation that provides health care to thousands of young adults around the nation? There are many arguments as to why Planned Parenthood should be defunded, including the claim that, “Planned Parenthood is illegally trafficking human body parts” (Roys). Despite the repeated blows towards this health institution, there are also justifiable reasons as to why Planned Parenthood is a beneficial establishment for young adults searching for affordable health care. Furthermore, there are also numerous religious groups …show more content…
Specifically, in 2013, Planned Parenthood provided services to 2.7 million patients. Of which included prenatal care, which was administered to over 18,684 people (Goldschmidt). The various types of services that are provided consist of sexually transmitted disease testing and treatment, contraception, cancer screening and prevention, including the least provided service by the health institution of which were abortions (Robertson). Although many people may not agree with the idea of abortion or the actual process of it, without Planned Parenthood there would be drastic consequences from removing this health care option. Granted there are equal arguments for both sides debating over whether Planned Parenthood should be defunded, I believe that this health institution is more beneficial than harmful. After Sanger established Planned Parenthood in 1916, the nonprofit organization has been providing …show more content…
Which out of these services, only three percent were from providing abortions. The majority of Planned Parenthood funding helps with testing and treating sexually transmitted diseases and infections, and the other main use of funding goes to providing contraception to those who are sexually active (Robertson). Henceforth comes the question, if the majority of Planned Parenthood services don’t provide abortions, then why is there such an immense outrage against this health care provider? Another point of interest is that Planned Parenthood cannot legally use the federal government’s funding to pay for abortions. (Robertson) If this is the case, then the outraged protestors should not be worried about the government spending all of its income to just throw away for an abortion. There are several more beneficial aspects from Planned Parenthood, but these are just a summary of the main