Preview

Plain View Doctrine Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
280 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plain View Doctrine Research Paper
Plain View Doctrine
Misty Basford
Kaplan University

Plain View Doctrine
This rule gives police officers the ability to seize evidence involved in a crime without a warrant if the evidence is in plain sight. This rule is limited by probable cause which requires police officers to have probable cause and believe the items in plain view are evidence before they seize them. The fourth amendment does prevent unreasonable searches and seizures.
There are two ways the rule can be used. 1. The officer is at the place where the seized item(s) is in plain view. 2. The incriminating object is immediately apparent. An example of this would be if an officer was called to a domestic call and one person had been shot and the other person was there and
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Govt201 Unit 1 Amendment
    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Govt201 Unit 1 Amendment

    4th Amendment - Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause as determined by a neutral judge or magistrate…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fourth Amendment
    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fourth Amendment

    Arizona (1978), the police collected evidence for four days after the suspect’s apprehension and the death of a police officer at the time of the arrest. He was convicted for murder, assault and narcotics offences. However, because they collected the evidence without a warrant, the suspect’s conviction on the murder of the police officer and assault charges was reversed by the Arizona Supreme Court, but upheld the narcotics conviction. This is a prime example of where the Fourth Amendment protects against unlawful searches. Even though the evidence was overwhelming proof that the suspect murdered the police officer, it was the responsibility of the police to do their due diligence to conduct the search legally. Had they obtained the proper warrants, the conviction would have still been upheld and the suspect would have been punished for the crime he…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Duties Of Citizenship In America
    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Duties Of Citizenship In America

    4th Amendment protects your right against unreasonable search and seizure of property, papers, or people without valid probable cause…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ken Krooks Case Study
    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ken Krooks Case Study

    Under what is known as the Plain View Doctrine is called a search-related plain view, referring to items that are identified by the responding officer who was authorized to specifically search for it. In this particular case, the officer was authorized to search for a white, 6’0 tall individual who was wearing a black baseball cap, black t-shirt, and jeans. Even though this description is vague, this individual was in the area of the crime, did match the description, and acted merely suspicious in the officer’s presence. This initially identification is where the detention had occurred in this particular case. The plain view doctrine also states that an officer has the ability to make a warrantless seizure of an object that is involved in a crime if the officer can identify the object in plain view (Terry v. Ohio,…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Castle Doctrine Research Paper
    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page

    Castle Doctrine Research Paper

    I believe that Castle Doctrine is a double edge sword because it gives home owner way to protect their property but we that said in the case of Trayvon Martin who was shot and killed by a neighborhood watch should have never happen the kid was not a treat to any property at the time of the murder. I do believe that if someone is in your house and it becomes apparent that they will hurt you and your family you have the right to protect your house but if the person is walking away from your property and away from you it should be illegal to shoot and killed the person. If a person is running away from you it is not self-defense if you shoot someone in the back is not self-defense.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plain View Doctrine In Open Field
    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plain View Doctrine In Open Field

    In our readings the plain view doctrine states “that items that are within the sight of an officer who is legally in a place from which the view is made may properly be seized without a warrant—as long as such items are immediately recognizable as subject to seizure”. There are some requirements of the plain view doctrine. One requirement is the awareness of the items solely through the officer’s sight. Another requirement is that the officer must be legally in the place of where the item is seen. There are a few ways the officer could be there legally which are; while serving a search warrant, while in pursuit of a suspect, entry with a valid consent, and while making a valid…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drug Abuse And Control Act Of 1970: A Case Study
    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page

    Drug Abuse And Control Act Of 1970: A Case Study

    The alleged property that is connected to the crimes must be named in the seizure warrant in order for it to be seized by the police officers. Unfortunately, in order to retrieve the property, the owner of the property must establish a preponderance of evidence to prove that the property was not used to commit a…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Arizona vs Grant
    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Arizona vs Grant

    The new ruling in Arizona v. grant adds modifications to the Fourth Amendment in regards to police searches. The changes state, “Police may search the passenger compartment of a vehicle incident to recent occupant’s arrest only if it is reasonable to believe that the arrestee might access the vehicle at the time of the search or that the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest” (Arizona v. Grant 07-542.) The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the fact that officers can justify search a vehicle in traffic violations or any situation where no other evidence of crime had occurred. Example of those would be: failure to appear, driving without a license, failing to pay child support. Arizona v. Grant allows checking for weapons within reach of the suspect, or anywhere reasonable within reach of the suspect.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Full Gospel Baptist Research Paper
    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Full Gospel Baptist Research Paper

    Abstract Baptism, associated greatly with the Christian religion, did not originate with John the Baptist as many would assume from well-known Bible stories. Jesus ' time, the washing of almost anything was considered as a way of cleansing and purifying to rid of sin or to make clean. Rituals and Practices are very important in Full Gospel Baptist Churches. So many things revolve around these simple but important rituals. Over thousands of years Baptism has been a tradition in the Church and Christian communities all over the world. Most rituals are performed in a church of choice by a priest who has been…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson Bible Research Paper
    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jefferson Bible Research Paper

    As a work of theological literature, Thomas Jefferson’s The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth, or otherwise popularly known as the Jefferson Bible, has historically either been considered a philosophical masterpiece or shrugged off as irreverent blasphemy. From a fundamentalist point-of-view, Jefferson had desecrated the world’s most glorified and holy text, butchering doctrines by which countless people live with his illicit cutting-and-pasting. On the other hand, thinkers from the Enlightenment camp saw Jefferson’s aggressive interpretation of the New Testament as a necessary adaptation to modernity, a much-needed reconciliation of an outdated text with a changing…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    American Search Case
    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    American Search Case

    It was adopted as a response to the abuse of search warrants in the American Revolution. The debate of the definition of search has been challenged in many cases in the history of the United States and is brought up again in this case. The Supreme Court ruled that a search occurs only when a person expects privacy in the thing search and society beliefves that expectation is reasonable. This was decided in Katz v. United States in 1967. In Katz the Court ruled that a search had occurred when the government wiretapped a telephone booth. Now seizure is the other part of the 4th amendment. A Seizure of propert occurs when there is meaningful interference by the government with an individual's possessory interests. The exclusionary rule also falls under seizure. The exclusionary rule states that voluntary answers to questions given to officers are offered into evidence in a ciminal prosecution. The government may not detain and individual even momentarily without reasonable, objective grounds, with few exceptions. The refusal to listen or answers does not answer these grounds. The invasion on people's privacy is only minimal and is usually only in speical cases. Some of these…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Essay
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule Essay

    Once an arrest is made, and the defendant is going to court. The courts must recognize if the evidence that was seized was…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop and Frisk
    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stop and Frisk

    The Supreme Court rejected the defendants' arguments. The Court noted that stops and frisks are considerably less intrusive than full-blown arrests and searches. It also observed that the interests in crime prevention and in police safety require that the police have some leeway to act before full probable cause has developed. The Fourth Amendment's reasonableness requirement is sufficiently flexible to permit an officer to investigate the situation. The "sole justification" for a frisk, said the Court, is the "protection of the police officer and others nearby." Because of this narrow scope, a frisk must be "reasonably designed to discover guns,…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Search and Seizure: in Plain Smell
    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Search and Seizure: in Plain Smell

    3. The officer must have probable cause to believe the object is evidence of a crime.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Evaluation
    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule Evaluation

    The exclusionary rule is divided into three elements. The first element requires that an item is physically collected as evidence. The second element is that the item of evidence must have been collected by a governmental officer or a person acting on their behalf, for example; confidential informants or citizens acting under posse comitatus. The third element is that there has to be a connection between the collected item of evidence and an illegal action by the officer in obtaining the items (Zalman, 2008).…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics