It is a positive development for Washington to pay greater strategic attention on Asia. However, the policy is facing two crucial problems right now, the strained relationship among the East Asian countries and the west Philippine Sea dispute. These problems should be approached by the U.S. smoothly and carefully. It must be careful to prevent the policy change from agitating China while maintaining balance in policies toward Europe and other regions.
Between the two crucial problems, the U.S. should be concern more on the West Philippine Sea dispute rather than the other problem. Why? It is because the sea of the disputed area played an enormously valuable role as the international highway of global trade. Half of all the world’s intercontinental goods pass through the South China Sea, amounting to $1.2 trillion in trade with the US every year (Carlson, 2012). However, they should also not forget about the other issue because it might elevate from its status. The U.S. should also monitor the happenings between the East Asian countries.
The South China Sea functions as the gateway of the Western Pacific and Indian Oceans. So, the American interests in the region are increasingly at risk due to the economic and military rise of China and concerns about its willingness to uphold existing legal norms. Because of that the U.S. should intervene. The United States has taken a neutral stand on the territorial disputes between China and its allies in Southeast Asia. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton outlined America’s emerging priorities in the South China Sea: freedom of navigation, unimpeded commerce, maintenance of peace and stability, and respect for international law in the disputed seas. Also, America 's main focus should be on guaranteeing the freedom of global trade routes, and leave the mess of sorting out sovereignty to the states involve in the dispute themselves.
The US should take a step back from the issue, it has made its point with respect to its support for a key ally, and the region as a whole, but ultimately it is in the US interest to have regional stability and not allow the conflict to escalate further, which has the possibility to start a new world war.
Nadezza Gutierrez
References: Carlson, B. (2012, May 9). China-Philippines standoff: Will the US military get involved? Retrieved February 9, 2014, from Global Post: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/china/120509/us-south-china-sea Sung-joo, H. (2012, April 27). What Does Washington 's 'Pivot to Asia ' Policy Mean? Retrieved February 9, 2014, from The Chusonilbo: http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2012/04/27/2012042701343.html
References: Carlson, B. (2012, May 9). China-Philippines standoff: Will the US military get involved? Retrieved February 9, 2014, from Global Post: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/china/120509/us-south-china-sea Sung-joo, H. (2012, April 27). What Does Washington 's 'Pivot to Asia ' Policy Mean? Retrieved February 9, 2014, from The Chusonilbo: http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2012/04/27/2012042701343.html
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The United States has progressed economically and as a result methods of expansionism have evolved but it also tried to stay with the ideals of the forefathers. In Document C the importance of naval power is expressed and it outlines the obligations: the protection of the chief harbors by fortification and coast-defense ships, the naval force, the arm of offensive power which alone enables a country to extend its influence outward, and that no foreign state should henceforth acquire a coaling position within three thousand miles of San Francisco. In Document E Naval dominance in the Pacific Ocean is further stated by Senator Albert J. Beveridge in his speech to the 56th Congress. It states “The Pacific is our ocean…And the Pacific is the ocean of the commerce of the future…The power that rules the Pacific, therefore, is the power that rules the world.” America began expanding to find markets for our ever-growing production. Once it had conquered the continental United States, it had the ambition to take on the world, as well as a faith in God that expanded. The United States could withstand the competition involved in economic world dominance because of the acquisition of a naval power. This is shown in Document G; the cartoon of American Diplomacy in 1900. Uncle Sam is standing at the forefront of China’s open door holding the key which represents American Diplomacy. The Roosevelt Corollary was the most important departure from past United States expansionism it made the acquisition of…
- 680 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The relationship between the U.S. and China is one of the most important two-sided relationships in this century. Dr. Kissinger made lots of valid point in his webinar. Kissinger…
- 410 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Zakaria suggests America reevaluates its role in the international system to be able to produce foreign policies that will enable US to adapt to the new era. The task for today is to construct a new approach for a new era, one that responds to a global system in which power is far more diffuse than ever before and in which everyone feels empowered (Zakaria 231). Zakaria suggests that there is a need for change in America’s foreign policy, but the foundation is sound. America should not be concerned about being overthrown since many developing powers are joining, and not fighting America. Developing nations like China and India, “want to gain power and status and respect, for sure, but by growing within the international system, not by overturning it” (Zakaria 232). Thus, America should not response to the emerging countries with force or in a negative manner. Encouraging diplomatic relations and opening new economic trade relations with all of the emerging powers will foster a prosperous global environment and consolidate the American ideals in global…
- 971 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
References: Hormats, R. D. (2011, September 13). U.S. Economic Policy and the Asia Pacific. Retrieved March 4, 2012, from US Department of States: http://www.state.gov/e/rls/rmk/2011/172307.htm…
- 749 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Regional stability in East Asia is the key to maintain US’s national interests. The US seeks to prevent any power to dominate Asia in order to ensure our free trade with Asian countries, navy ruling over the Pacific and continuing influence in the region. However, the rise of China and recent territorial disputes over South China Sea and Diaoyu Island pose great challenges to this goal. This policy memo points out a problem in the existing foreign policy that the US’s ambiguous position in East Asia would be adversarial in maintaining its own national interests. A clearer positioning of the US in East Asia is necessary. While active military engagement and subtle engagement are not feasible, the position as a mediator fostering regional cooperation and mutual trust is the only available option left.…
- 773 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the past few years China has started to have a great impact on the world’s economy because of its products which now can be found in almost every country. Having its goods “invading” the world’s markets the Chinese government is becoming richer and richer every day. If a country becomes rich, its goals start to rise and the will to have more power also rises, and its economy takes a big boost. This economic growth is what a country needs and mostly desires but the other powers see it as a danger to their economy and to their protection. A strong economy means a strong army which the country will create to protect its self or to mute other countries that oppose it. Since 1979 China’s economy has been growing 9 % each year and it has replaced the United States products in most of the Asian continent. Now days most of the Asian countries depend more on the Chinese goods then the ones from the United States. This is noticed from the comparison of the amount of goods exported from both these countries (Ross, 2005). After the market reforms made in late 1970s the Chinese economy has quadrupled and will continue rising more. China today consumes a third of the world’s supplies of iron, steel and also coal and has become a major manufacturing center (Ikenberry, 2008). The trends show that the Asian countries depend more on China’s economy rather than the United States, so is clear that the United States influence in these countries is becoming weaker. This means for the United States that the money is lost; products are not sold (Ross). Considering all these facts it is obvious that if China’s economic growth continues not only East Asia but also the United States will be threatened militarily and also economically by the new power.…
- 1204 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Eikenberry, K., Does China Threaten Asia-Pacific Regional Stability? In Parameters, US Army War College Quarterly, Spring, 1995. http://carlisle-www.army.mil/usawc/parameters/1995/eiken.htm. Accessed on 22 October 2010.…
- 13480 Words
- 54 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Taiwan, otherwise known as the Republic of China (ROC), has a complicated political status on the world stage. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) lays territorial claims to Taiwan and most countries recognize China as the mainland as Taiwan as an autonomous region within it. However, Taiwan sees itself independent as the true government of China, but only a couple dozen countries recognize it as sovereign government and by technical definition of what constitutes as a sovereign state under the Montevideo Convention of 1933, Taiwan fits the criteria.1 Though before 1971, both countries laid claims to “China’s” seat on the UN and other international organizations, the PRC was given the seat due to its more powerful status and as a more strategic ally in combating the USSR’s (Soviet Union’s) influence as the PRC and the USSR were not on good terms by this point. Therefore, the ROC’s “seat” on international conferences is currently occupied by the PRC. This grants Taiwan virtually no presence on the world stage, and due to the PRC’s influence, also denied “observer status,” which would grant them presence without power to make decisions. Despite this, many countries continue to have official non-diplomatic relations with Taiwan, including economic relations. Taiwan greatly benefits from these economic relationships and has become a forerunner in the technological industry with a strong economy to match. This makes Taiwan a valuable trade partner to the US. To better assess Taiwan’s importance in American foreign policy in East Asia, understanding its history and current relations with the PRC and the US will help the US better shape its policy.…
- 3461 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
[ 4 ]. Kurt M. Cambell, Nirav Patel, Vikran J. Singh, The Power of Balance: America in iAsia; http://www.mercury.ethz.ch/Files/2008-06_CampbellPatelSingh_iAsia…
- 4418 Words
- 18 Pages
Best Essays -
The USA has been the pre-eminent force is the global economy for almost 100 yrs, having superseded the original industrial leader early in the 20. Century. Europe as a region is the world’s biggest trading area and primary focus of FDI. Without any doubt, the most significant global shift in the geography of the world economy during the past 40yrs has been the resurgence of Asia. ( The rise of Japan after WWII, The rapid growth of what come to be called the four tigers-Hong Kong, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, The re-emergence of China and the Potential economic dynamism of India)…
- 286 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Zhou, J. (2008). Does China 's rise threaten the United States? Asian Perspective, (3), 171-182.…
- 2561 Words
- 11 Pages
Better Essays -
THE IMPLICATIONS OF CHINA’S NAVAL MODERNIZATION AND GROWING PRESENCE IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA ON PHILIPPINES-CHINA RELATIONS…
- 2044 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In my interactions with numerous scholars at college, I observed that there was a large disconnect between how Americans and Chinese people view certain issues. I realized with China’s growing global presence, individuals who understand the perspectives of both countries would be in a unique position to promote relations. Over the course of four years, I gained better insight into international relations as well as U.S.’ unique position in the global community. Over a semester in Washington, D.C. I wrote a junior thesis on the disparate impact of economic development on China’s various ethnic populations. In addition, a semester Peking University in China completed my holistic international education through direct interactions with Chinese professors and students. These undergraduate experiences culminated into a senior independent research project on China’s national interests in the South China Sea dispute and consequences it has on U.S. national security interests. At the same time, I interned for the Hudson Institute’s Center for Political-Military Analysis. As an intern I contributed to white papers on China-East Asian countries relations that were used to White House officials during a major rise in tension in the South China Sea…
- 642 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
he end of the Cold War created a strategic vacuum in the South China Sea. The collapse of the Soviet Union and its departure from Cam Ranh Bay; the closure of United States’ naval bases in the Philippines; and Vietnam’s withdrawal from Cambodia diminished superpower influence in the region. These events also prompted several East Asian littoral governments to re-calculate the strategic and national security implications of sovereignty claims made to islands in the South China Sea. In this regard, the financial turmoil that has whipsawed national economies throughout East Asia since 1998 has undercut the political stability of these same states and, in so doing, contributed to exacerbating tensions over conflicting maritime claims in the area. In 1999 the Spratly Islands dispute reemerged as a security flashpoint in the South China Sea. This most recent flare-up over the Spratlys occurred between China and the Philippines over structures built on the aptly-named Mischief Reef, a tiny land feature known locally as Panganiban and situated within the Philippines’ 200-mile exclusive economic zone as defined by contemporary ocean law.1 Sino–Filipino conflict over Mischief Reef dates back to February 1995, when China built and manned three octagonal structures perched on stilts atop the atoll. Following a three-year hiatus, China resumed construction at Mischief Reef in late October 1998. At least four military supply ships and some 100 workers were involved in the construction operation to lay concrete foundations there.2 These events reignited tensions between China and the Philippines over their…
- 23271 Words
- 94 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Most say that we are looking at a “New Cold War.” This dispute starts with the typical property issue. Beijing believes that almost the entire sea (from the islands, reefs and submerged rocks to the fish and underwater energy reserves,) belongs to them. Controversially, The U.S. believes the South China Sea is international waters. The dispute over territory is only one of the many issues we are currently facing with China. Some other issues are as follows: Cybersecurity, South China Sea, human rights, intellectual property rights, and trade disputes are just a few, of many issues causing tension between China and…
- 746 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays