My Rhetorical Analysis of "Pit Bull, Bum Rap?"
In 2004, Maclean's published Lianne George's essay, "Pit Bull, Bum Rap?" in regards to a proposal to ban pit bulls. Lianne George is currently an associate editor for Maclean's magazine in Canada. She has written numerous commentaries such as this one, "Pit Bull, Bum Rap?" for Maclean's and other publications like the National Post. Lianne George begins with an overview of dog breeds falling in and out of fashion. She compares the current pit bull hysteria to those of previous ones including Dalmatians and Doberman Pinschers. However, the pit bull has been considered the meanest dog for the past two decades. George follows this with information about attacks in the past few weeks and how Ontario introduced legislation to ban pit bulls (and related breeds). She also brings to attention how the term "pit bull" is often misused to describe similar breeds, but not the true American pit bull terrier. George uses multiple animal experts with in Canada to come to the conclusion that breed-specific bans do not address the real problem - high-risk owners. She quotes Dr. Gary Landsberg, a Thornhill, Ont., veterinarian and president of the American College of Veterinary Behaviorists, by stating that any dog can be dangerous if not properly trained, socialized and controlled. George finalizes her essay with a brief positive history of the American pit bull terrier and the actions that are being taking to protect responsible pit bull owners. Lianne George's commentary is part of some larger issues at stake. For example, is it against civil rights or constitutional rights for a government to ban certain breeds? "But the province's animal experts argue the legislation is rooted not in facts and expert opinion, but in media-generated hysteria." Also the bans are not solving the problem of violent dogs. The real dilemma is high risk owners. "
'people who want to breed and/or own vicious dogs will simply turn to other...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document