Pillow Method

Topics: Pragmatics, National Sorry Day, Speech act Pages: 39 (9634 words) Published: April 17, 2013
Do children apologize to each other?
Apology events in young Israeli peer discourse
ZOHAR KAMPF and SHOSHANA BLUM-KULKA

Abstract
Children’s apologies are greatly under-researched. Though there is wealth of information available on the pragmatics of apologies generally, we know much less about whether and how children apologize. Our study explores modes of remedial work by Israeli children in peer discourse. The data were collected through ethnographic observation of Israeli preschool and preadolescents, and consist of 57 (taped and transcribed) apology events identified in natural peer interactions. The analysis of children’s apology events revealed a rich range of apology strategies used by 4 6 year old children, indicating the acquisition of remedial competencies for face management at a relatively early age and showed that with age, a richer range of potential violations is identified, and more elaborate forms of repair are being used, indicating a growing sensitivity to the other’s face needs. Furthermore, we found that adult intervention in children’s conflictual situations serves to model remedial strategies, but is not necessarily effective for conflict resolution. Importantly, peer talk apology events index the centrality of friendship in young children’s social world: breaches from expected behavior in play are taken as face threatening to the core of friendship, namely the children’s shared face as friends, and hence can function to end (even if temporarily) the friendship. Consequently, in such cases, the restoration of friendship becomes a necessary precondition for the felicitous realization of an apology.

Keywords: apology, remedial work, remedial competencies, pragmatic development, peer talk, social norms 1. Introduction
The apology as a speech act has recently received a great deal of attention in a variety of disciplines philosophy, sociology, psychology, law, Journal of Politeness Research 3 (2007), 11 37
DOI 10.1515/PR.2007.002

1612-5681/07/003 0011
Walter de Gruyter

12

Zohar Kampf and Shoshana Blum-Kulka

political science, international relations, communication and discourse studies
and through diverse methodologies. Nevertheless, there are
still surprising lacunae in this field, such as the lack of knowledge on the pragmatic development of children’s apologies in natural discourse. The pragmatic study of apologies to date has been mainly adult-usage oriented, whether conducted within the framework of gender differences (Holmes 1989, 1993; Tannen 1994), cross-cultural (for example, Olshtain 1989, Suszczynska 1999; Rieter 2000) or interlanguage pragmatics ´

(Trosberg 1987; Garcia 1989; Bergman and Kasper 1993).
Children’s apologies have been most frequently studied from the standpoint of social psychology, using mainly experimental methodologies. In this approach the experiments conducted focused primarily on judgments of the perception and effectiveness of apologies (Meier 2004). As Meier stresses in her brief but exhaustive review, the study of children’s apologies has been “developmental in nature, precipitated by an interest in the overall socialization process. Focuses have thus been on apology production as it relates to cognitive maturation and concomitant changes in perceptions of responsibility, intentionality and self.” (Meier 2004: 5). However, as far as we are aware, no study to date has examined the speech act realization of apologies in natural child discourse (in both peer and adult-child interactions). Thus, research is needed to address questions such as strategy choice in relation to contextual and social factors; the types of violations triggering apologetic behavior in children’s social worlds; and face-management as related to face-threat and remedial work in the sequence of interaction. The dearth of research concerning children is puzzling, particularly in view of the importance of apologies from a developmental perspective. Mastering the ability to...

References: Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, Excuses and Apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration
Strategies
Bergman, L. M. and G. Kasper (1993). Perception and performance in native and
nonnative apology
Brown, P. and S. Levinson (1987 [1978]). Politeness: Some Universals in Language
Usage
Blum-Kulka, S., J. House, and G. Kasper (eds.) (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics:
Requests and Apologies
Blum-Kulka, S., D. Huck-Taglicht, and H. Avni (2004). The social and discursive
spectrum of peer talk
Blum-Kulka, S. (2005). ‘I will tell you the whole true story now’: Sequencing the past,
present and future in children’s conversational narratives
Butler, C. D. (2001). The role of context in the apology speech act: A socio-constructivist analysis of the interpretations of native English-speaking college students.
Chen, R. (2001). Self politeness: A proposal. Journal of Pragmatics, 33: 87 106.
Corsaro, W. A. (1985). Friendship and Peer Culture in the Early Years. Norwood,
N.J.: Ablex.
Darby, B. W. and B. R. Schlenker (1982). Children’s reactions to apologies. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology 43: 742 753.
Darby, B. W. and B. R. Schlenker (1989). Children’s reactions to transgressions: Effects of the actor’s apology, reputation and remorse. British Journal of Social
Psychology 28: 353 364.
Deutschmann, M. (2003) Apologizing in British English. Umea: Umea University
Press.
Edmondson, W. J. (1981). On Saying You’re Sorry. In Conversational Routine, F. Coulmas, (ed.), 273 288. The Hague: Mouton De Gruyter.
Garcia, C. (1989). Apologizing in English: Politeness strategies used by native and
non native speakers
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in Public. New York: Basic Books.
Graybill, D. (1990). Developmental changes in the response types versus aggression
categories on the Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration Study, Children’s Form
Hickson, L. (1986). The social contexts of apology in dispute settlement: A crosscultural study. Ethnology, 25: 283 294.
Holmes, J. (1989). Sex differences and apologies: One aspect of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 10: 194 213.
Holmes, J. (1990). Apologies in New Zealand English. Language in Society, 19 (2):
155 199.
Holmes, J. (1993). New Zealand women are good to talk to: An analysis of politeness
strategies in interaction
Katriel, T. (1985). Brogez: Ritual and strategy in Israeli children’s conflicts. Language
in Society, 14 (4): 467 490.
Lakoff, R. B. (2001). Nine ways of looking at apologies: The necessity for interdisciplinary theory and method in discourse analysis. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton (eds.), 199 214. Oxford: Blackwell.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Meier A. J. (1998). Apologies: What do we know? Journal of Applied Linguistics.
Meier, A. J. (2004). Conflict and the power of apologies. PhiN (Philologie im Netz).
Much, N. C. and Shweder, R. A. (1978). Speaking of rules: The analysis of culture in
breach
Olshtain, E. (1989). Apologies across languages. In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, S. Blum-Kulka, H. Juliane, and G. Kasper (eds.), 155 173.
Reiter, R. M. (2000). Linguistics Politeness in Britain and Uruguay. Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Robinson, J. D. (2004). The sequential organization of “explicit” apologies in naturally occurred English. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37 (3):
291 330.
Schadler, M. and B. Ayers-Nachamkin (1983). The development of excuse-making. In
Excuses: Masquerades in Search of Grace, C R
Sheldon, A. (1993). Saying it with a smile: Girls’ conflict talk as double-voice discourse. In Principles and Prediction: The Analysis of Natural Language. Papers
in Honor of Jerry Sander., M
Sheldon, A. and D. Johnson (1994). Preschool negotiators: Gender differences in
double-voice discourse as a conflict talk style in early childhood
Suszczynska, M. (1999). Apologizing in English, Polish and Hungarian: Different lan´
guages, different strategies
Tavuchis, N. (1991). Mea Culpa: A Sociology of Apology and Reconciliation. Stanford:
Stanford University Press
Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trosborg, A. (1987). Apology strategies in natives/non-natives. Journal of Pragmatics.
Weiner, B. and S. J. Handel (1985). A cognition-emotion-action sequence: Anticipated
emotional consequences of causal attributions and reported communication strategy
Weiner, B., J. F. Amirkhan, S. Valerie, and J. A. Verette (1987). An attributional analysis of excuse giving: Studies of a naive theory of emotion. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology 52: 316 324.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • the feather pillow Essay
  • Essay on Pillow Book by Sei Shonagan
  • Feasibility Study Pillow Sofie Essay
  • Essay on Pillow Book
  • Methods of Research Essay
  • Essay on Research Methods
  • The Effect of the Method of Sorting on Response Time Essay
  • Quantitative research methods Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free