Preview

Philosophy: Human Cloning; Humanity's Folly

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2163 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophy: Human Cloning; Humanity's Folly
Humanity’s Folly

Due to the psychological characteristics of humanity, and all humans’ universal inability to continually adhere to a universally agreed form of ethics, our species has no other option but to proclaim that further experimentation at this time in the science of human cloning is immoral. Before it can be addressed whether or not the benefits would outweigh the consequences, it must first be established what those prominent consequences are and since it is not possible to determine precisely what the benefits would be, the benefits presumed are instead based on possible probability.
The idea of human cloning is truly bewildering. Combined with genetic engineering, it is the stuff of legendary science fiction. Imagine a human being created to be the epitome of perfection in all aspects; appearance, intellect, and health. It would be as though we were gifted with an evolutionary leap into our own futures long before it arrives on an intellectual level, and on a physiological level perhaps attaining a perfection of health and body that could have never existed. With great intellect comes great discovery, and humans are truly incapable of imagining with accuracy what the future holds, for example, there is no limit to the potential contributions that a clone manufactured to become the most intelligent human ever to exist could bring forward. When stated in this way, the idea of cloning humans sounds ultimately good. Surely such an individual would be treasured by our world, and valued for their accomplishments and benefits to humanity. The revelations that could be brought forward, the cures for disease, the greater understanding into what makes a human a human, the fundamental principles of the creation of life beyond what we currently are aware, these are all found in the study and experimentation of human cloning. But what would be the cost?
Dr. Ian Wilmut, the man responsible for successfully cloning the sheep Dolly in 1996, claims that we

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Khan, F. M. (2003). HUMAN CLONING: -in the name of science. Economic Review (05318955), 34(2), 5.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminals could use human cloning to get away with crimes or exploit human cloning for unethical business practices. They could make money by using cloned humans as slaves, organ donors or to commit crimes on their behalf.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main issues that cloning brings about is whether or not people will take advantage of this new technology. For instance, Lewis Thomas wonders if “the rich and powerful but socially objectionable” or the “governments of dumb, docile masses” will misuse the technology. These seemingly important people may be able to give themselves a “version of immortality”. Just because the ability to clone exists does not mean that valuable people should be able to multiply themselves. No one on Earth is exactly the same for a reason, and it should stay that way. If there were to be several hundred Paris Hiltons or Kim Kardashians walking around, the world would be a pretty terrifying place. People should remain unique, separate from the “precise sameness” that Thomas…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cloning is a procedure conceived to notion in the late 1960s, but it is only recently that it was fully understood and that scientists have started to figure out how to successfully copy the genetic composition of one organism to another. Since science already knows how to do this, the only problems and obstacles that remains is efficiency and the success ratio of each operation. The cloning process consists of taking the nucleus of an organism, and placing it, along with the DNA that contains all the genetic material, in place of the nucleus of the host egg. The egg then forms an embryo and matures into the same exact "copy", at least genetically, as the original organism. Already done on mammals, cloning is something that can be extended to utilize humans as subjects. In the future it will be wholly possible to create human clones to serve whatever purpose they were conceived for. However, presently there are numerous ethical issues surrounding cloning and there are problems about the implications of the use of cloning for the purpose of medicine. This issue plagues us so much that the constant objections of bioethicists and political and religious leaders have caused the US Government to propose a ban on all research concerning human cloning until a conclusion is reached on the moral and ethical aspects of the process. (Macer, 2)…

    • 1585 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Cloning

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the article that I chose there are two opposing viewpoints on the issue of "Should Human Cloning Ever Be Permitted?" John A. Robertson is an attorney who argues that there are many potential benefits of cloning and that a ban on privately funded cloning research is unjustified and that this type of research should only be regulated. On the flip side of this issue Attorney and medical ethicist George J. Annas argues that cloning devalues people by depriving them of their uniqueness and that a ban should be implemented upon it. Both express valid points and I will critique the articles to better understand their points.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question shakes us all to our very souls. For humans to consider the cloning of one another forces them all to question the very concepts of right and wrong that make them all human. The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, is ethically and morally wrong. Scientists and ethicists alike have debated the implications of human and non-human cloning extensively since 1997 when scientists at the Roslin Institute in Scotland produced Dolly. No direct conclusions have been drawn, but compelling arguments state that cloning of both human and non-human species results in harmful physical and psychological effects on both groups. The following issues dealing with cloning and its ethical and moral implications will be addressed: cloning of human beings would result in severe psychological effects in the cloned child, and that the cloning of non-human species subjects them to unethical or moral treatment for human needs.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This question shakes us all to our very souls. For humans to consider the cloning of one another, forces everyone of us to question the very concepts of right and wrong that makes us all human. The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, is ethically and morally wrong. Scientists and ethicists alike have debated the dangerous implications of human and non-human cloning extensively since 1997 when scientists at the Roslin Institute in Scotland produced a cloned sheep, named Dolly. No direct conclusions have been drawn, but compelling arguments state that cloning of both human and non-human species results in harmful physical and psychological effects on both groups. The following issues dealing with cloning and its ethical and moral implications will be addressed: cloning of human beings would result in severe psychological effects in the cloned child, and that the cloning of non-human species such as animals subjects them to unethical or moral treatment for human needs.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his work from 2002 “Religion and Human Cloning: An Exploratory Analysis of the First Available Opinion Data”, John Evans proudly states a few possible benefits, or advantages, of human ‘therapeutic’ cloning. While talking about embryonic stem cells, he states “these cells can eventually be used to treat diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and kidney failure, to name but a few…”(748). These possibilities have mostly been confirmed since the publishing of Evans’ piece and other more incredible possibilities have come about. The benefits of both reproductive and therapeutic cloning are endless, yet many still disagree. They say that cloning is dangerous and that it would end human evolution and bring disaster to society as we know it (Mautner, 68). Do most people really think this is true? Or is modern society simply scared of the unknown and not ready for change? Many scientists and authors constantly debate the ethics and possibilities of human cloning, both for reproductive use and therapeutic use. A couple of possible risks would accompany the beginning of human cloning, however the benefits are legitimate, and we as a species should reconsider.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When people think of cloning they pay attention to the fact of how immoral it can be, but you have to look beyond that to see how much we could gain from cloning as a species.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ethics of Human Cloning

    • 2890 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Cloning before the 1990s was a science not well known among the public because major successes in this field involved non-mammalian animals; although these successes were far from the public interest of human cloning, they are still crucial to the development of mammalian cloning (Royal , 2009).…

    • 2890 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Cloning Controversy

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since the dawn of civilization, mankind has been plagued by innumerable ethical quandaries. From the subjugation of those whose pigment doesn’t match our own to the creation of weapons of mass destruction, history has repeatedly shown us that as the human race progresses, there are always ethical dilemmas that make us question our every step. As our technological capabilities continue to grow at an exponential rate, these predicaments have continued to crop up alarmingly fast. Among the most recent ethical questions to plague our society is the one pertaining to human cloning. Supporters of this potential technological breakthrough cite it as one of the greatest achievement of the human race, while its detractors bemoan the ethics of…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human Cloning Is Wrong

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Second, there are a lot of disadvantages and bad effects of human cloning such as emotional risks and improper wars. For example, a baby is born by cloning without parents, after going to school and being in class with his classmates who were born normally, then imagine what the child fell about himself. He will ask why he does not have parents and how he could be born. This is one of the disadvantages of human cloning as emotional risks. There is a small group of people who want to destroy a country such as terrorists. Because they do not have enough people, they just clone themselves couple times in order to get enough people to destroy the country. Then, you can imagine that will be many copies of same human who are used for war. I call this an improper war which is…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two different types of cloning, each with different goals and benefits. The first is therapeutic cloning which produces stem cells and even organs for transplantation. Instead of waiting on a donor list and hoping that an organ will arrive that would save your life, organs could be mass produced creating a perfect match that would be readily available. The second type of cloning is reproductive cloning. Reproductive cloning refers to allowing the clone to be created and live a regular life with the exact same DNA as the donor. Currently therapeutic cloning is being looked at as the first logical reason to clone. "Some types of disease and injury have no potential therapies other than those involving embryonic stem cells(cp #26, 3)." If perfected cloning could save thousands of lives and extend the life expectancy for the entire world. "The medical and scientific benefits of therapeutic cloning are so great…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human cloning, when mass produced, can have serious implications. Although additional people can also mean additional manpower, over population will be one of cloning’s immediate disadvantages. Our limited resources may not be able to handle the demands of the society.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The safe bet would be to limit cloning to certain medical and food enrichment areas. But, as the cloning genie departs its box, the drive to clone humans and animals quickens. Like stated, we still have wars, we still have criminals on the streets, and we still have problems with our economy. In other…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays