Philia, eros, and agape are three different Greek terms for the word. These three terms explain the different types of love a human being can acquire. Philia is a love of friendship, which is grounded in commonality. However, eros is a kind of love that seeks something from the other person or thing. Lastly, agape is the love that wills the good of the other and is completely self-giving. The meanings of these Greek terminologies, philia, eros, and agape, allow us to better understand and discuss our relationship with God and human fulfillment. In order to find human fulfillment, one must find God of Jesus Christ as well. Erotic loving is our desire for this fulfillment, which can be seen through eros. Human nature can be simply defined in our constant want and need for infinite. The infinite, for humans, is never being satisfied, always wanting more, the best, and as much as we can get of something. This insatiable drive within all of us takes us to the question of human fulfillment. Eros is not a noun but yet an action or an activity. For instance, eros is the longing and search for a significant other throughout our lives. By the same token, we search for God and yearn for infinite happiness and fulfillment from God. All human beings in one-way or another seek about human fulfillment. An example of someone who struggled with human fulfillment is Augustine. Although later he became known as Saint Augustine, in his earlier years he was everything but. Augustine was very intrigued by very common materialistic desires such as worldly possessions and lust. These skewed desires enthralled his thoughts, words, and actions. Consequently, Augustine became involved in petty crimes in order to feed this idea of “love” in the materialistic world. This concept of love and desire can be further illustrated as a receding horizon; the farther you continue into the horizon the bigger and more numerous your wants become. Later on Augustine reflected upon his materialistic
The Meaning of Love
Love is a funny thing. Although it is a very strong and unmistakable feeling, we are almost always left asking ourselves, “What is the meaning of love?” The dictionary has nearly 30 different definitions for the word “love”. The first definition, “a profoundly tender, passionate affection for another person” (APA), is probably the one that the majority of us relate to and understand. But just because this definition is widely accepted by couples all around the world, it doesn’t….
The word agape can be defined as the unconditional love of God or Christ for humankind. This was the first word that came to mind once I read the poem. It reminded me of going to church on Sundays; I go faithfully and wonder sometimes why God did for not only me but everyone here on earth. If that is not agape love, I don’t know what is! We are currently in a sin cursed world, where every time you turn around someone is doing some kind of evil. However, regardless of the harshness of the sin that….
Agape is the Greek word for love "divine" and "unconditional". Agape, often compared to Christian charity, for Plato, the third form that love takes after the "Eros" physical love and the love of the spirit of the other "Philia". It is a selfless love, without seeking personal gain, so it is love for love is to say, the act of charity mainly.
For Martin Luther King, the concept of agape stood at the center of both his spiritual belief in a knowable God and his assertion that love and nonviolence….
Eros, the god of love, is persistently called upon to assist mortals in their quest for love. He embodies love and his figure is often depicted off of a person’s feelings towards love. Both poems address the relationship between Eros and humans; however, the two have opposing underlying beliefs on love.
The two poems both use anatomic detail to relate the mortality and place of humans in their relationship with Eros. The first poem describes love as the “Tyrant of the Human heart”. The heart is….
Anders Nygren claims that Christian idea of agape and Plato’s eros are distinct and contradicted with each other. Although they are different kind of love, I believe they are not really contradicted with each other and can unite together. The following paragraphs will talk about the content of Agape and Eros first, and then discuss the possibility of the unity of them in different perspectives.
The term Eros is used to refer to that part of love constituting a passionate, intense desire for….
In Regards to Love: Agape and Philautia
Love can take form in many shapes such as agape and philautia. Agape is a selfless, sacrificial love in which someone voluntarily experiences agony for the sake of sparing another. Philautia is a selfish love in which someone only cares for their own happiness in life. While both are complete opposite forms of love, they share some similarities that are both positive and negative.
There is a fine line between agape and philautia. Most people….
find problems with Agape love with accordance to their own respective philosophies of love. Lewis describes a paradoxical relation between God’s love and natural loves. Whereas Nietzsche explicates that the grounds that a person’s behavior may present itself as Agape love, is actually a behavior motivated primarily for selfish reason of gaining power. When comparing these two problems with Agape love, Nietzsche’s explanation is stronger in explaining the pattern of Agape love in the current western….
claims that Christian idea of agape and Plato’s eros are distinct and contradicted with each other. Please comment this opinion with stating the content of these two ideas of love and examine the possibility of the unity of them.
I do not agree with this statement. Though these two ideas are distinct, there is no contradiction between them and it is possible for these two distinct ideas to be unified.
Christian idea of Agape is an idea of love is ‘unconditional love’ advocated by Christ and his….
Love is a perception in each and every persons mind. It varies and changes depending on the person. Yet love is also a game, a game of poker where the player thinks he has the upper hand and bets those fifteen thousand dollars he doesn't have. He's sure he's won,then ends up loosing because he took the risky chance of trusting something so unreliable. In both the poems about Eros by Robert Bridges and Anne Stevenson, two concepts of Eros are created through the use of imagery, rhetorical questions….
In the Poem, EPÇÃ, by Robert Bridges, Eros is referred to as an ¡§¡Kidol of the human race¡K¡¨ with a perfect form and looks, however, he bears no expression on his face. On the other hand, in the poem, EROS, by Anne Stevenson, Eros is portrayed as a ¡§thug¡¨ with a bruised and ¡§patchy¡¨ appearance. I believe that although both authors are trying to convey the same message, they choose different ways to go about it.
In the poem by Anne Stevenson, I believe that she is trying to show that while….