philo

Does the question of why do I do this action cross your mind once a day? If yes then you are one of the followers of MILL since these free thinker philosopher argue that there are choices of doing your actions however , you are also subject to the freewill of making these choices. In Contrast, if no then Holbach would be your person of choice. Since for Holbach everything is determined by you organization so the mere thought of this question does not exist. In this analytical essay the theories of these two important philosophers will be discussed thoroughly in addition to providing examples on why they try to prove the point of there statements and finally the personal choice that I will conclude will come out of the result of analyzing these two philosophers and basing their theories on my choices of my opinion. According to B.F skinner a social philosopher he says “The belief that human are not free is essential to the study of behavioral science”. However Holbach and Jhon Stuart MILL introduced different theories and analysis. In this paper I will be discussing both of the philosophers arguments and my personal opinion in accordance to their beliefs.

Baron D’Holbach ,a philosopher beliefs that everything surrounding us determine us specifically by our organization. He discusses that an organization is made up of our society, culture, education, phycology, beliefs, peers…etc. He described that a person’s life on earth is fully determined and not free. According to Holbach being free does not exist. Determinism does not allow us to be free, our choices are not considered to freewill either. He explains that choices are all because of a cause law hence; he means that whatever we do is because of another cause. For instance, if we decide to not eat today, it is because we want to be skinny and wanting to be skinny could possibly be because of peer pressure, media and psychologically, we could relate it to so many things that determined us to do such an