Preview

Philip Zimbardo and His Contributions to Psychology

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1113 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philip Zimbardo and His Contributions to Psychology
Philip Zimbardo and His Contributions to Psychology
Fall 2013

In today’s fast paced society many of us have a tough time dealing and coping with our problems. This is when psychologists come into play. Psychology is the scientific study of behavior and mental processes. It deals with the mind and how we process mental and emotional things. Philip Zimbardo’s thoughts on psychology are, “I have been primarily interested in how and why ordinary people do unusual things, things that seem alien to their natures. Why do good people sometimes act evil? Why do smart people sometimes do dumb or irrational things?” And this is exactly what he tested in his Stanford Prison experiment.
Philip Zimbardo was born on March 23 in 1933 in New York City. Being raised in the South Bronx, he was the first person to attend college in his family. After enrolling in Brooklyn College, that’s where he earned his bachelors degree in 1954. (Fails) He then received his Masters from Yale University in 1955 and his Ph.D in 1958, which are both in psychology. For a short time he taught at Yale in 1958, and then went to New York University and Columbia University. He has been a professor at Stanford University since 1968. (Williams, 1998)
His research has covered so many ideas and areas of psychology. It has involved role playing, laboratory experiments, field studies, simulations and studies that demonstrate psychology phenomena. (Fails) All of his research has been mainly about how good people could turn evil, intelligent people end up doing dumb things, normal people do unexpected things and how the power of certain social situations can really change people’s personalities whether they are a man or a woman. Zimbardo has won more than twenty-four awards throughout his life. He has also served on twenty boards and consultations, is the author of more than twenty psychology textbooks, has written over one hundred

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Zimbardo’s infamous study: the Stanford Prison Experiment is another positive example of circumstantial determinants overriding personality. The Stanford Prison Experiment is an experiment designed to determine the effect of a medley of situational variables on the behavior of subjects roleplaying prisoners and guards in a simulated prison environment. In his subsequent novel, The Lucifer Effect, Zimbardo stated that originally, the experiment intended to discern “what people bring into a prison situation from what the situation brings out in the people who are there” (Philip Zimbardo). The participants, representative of educated youth belonging to the middle class, were arrested from their homes with no previous warning on Sunday, August 14th 1971. Upon arrival at the constructed prison simulation at Stanford University they were randomly assigned into…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the infamous experiment in the history of psychology was the Stanford Prison Experiment. Its creator, Dr. Zimbardo, main objective was to see what effects would occur when a psychological experiment into human nature was performed. As I began to perform some research of my own, I noticed that my thoughts on the matter were similar to many; that as a scientific research project, Mr. Zimbardo’s experiment it was a complete failure. However, his findings did provide us with something that was much more important that is still being talked about today; insight into human psychology and social behavior.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillip K. Zimbardo, who is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, directed the Stanford Prison Experiment, also known as the Zimbardo Experiment. The goal of the Zimbardo experiment was to research how willing human beings would imitate to the characters of correctional officers and inmates in an acting role that replicated life behind bars. But what really happens when you remove the freedoms of human beings and place them in subservient positions and place them in jail cell type settings? The answer is that the mind and physical well-being is drastically and forever changed for the worse, which Mr. Zimbardo’s tests proved.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This study is considered a classic when with regards to prison psychology. According to the American Psychological Association (2004) “Its messages have been carried in many textbooks in the social sciences, in classroom lectures across many nations, and in popular media renditions. Its web site has gotten over 15 million unique page views in the past four years, and more than a million a week in the weeks following the expose of the abuse of Iraqi prisoners by American Military Police army reservists in Abu Ghraib Prison”. Zimbardo’s research has come to be known as one of the classical example of how circumstantial power has the ability to influence individuals in multiple domains. This experiment is historically one of the prime examples of how even the most “good” person when placed under specific situations can in turn transform into “evil”. It shows just how easily individuality can be stripped away and in turn how the environment can define and dictate ones…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Schultz, D.P. & Schultz, S.E. (2011). A History of Modern Psychology. Belmont, CA. Wadsworth.…

    • 822 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Zimbardo Stanford Prison Study was conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1971, at Stanford University. The experiment was to last two weeks and be conducted in the basement of the Stanford University basement. The 24 chosen participants, Students from Canada and US, would be randomly selected to either be a guard or a prisoner, with Zimbardo being the warden. The pay was 15 dollars a day; the study was to see how the effects of confinement, in prison life, with the situational variables in place how this would impact the human behavior. Do the prisons make criminals go more psychotic as the days past? Would good people turn sadists? Within this report we will find out if Zimbardo was able to complete…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo Prison Eperiment

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the field of psychology, experiments are an essential part of the study. Guidelines have been fenced around the experiments to protect the subjects being tested. Unethical experiments had to take place in order for these guidelines to be placed. In 1971, Psychologist Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment that changed the future of psychology and how it is practiced today, The Stanford Experiment. According to Kendra Cherry, author of an article The Stanford Experiment, researchers asked how subjects would react when placed in a prison environment.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In August of 1971, a group of researchers, headed by Dr. Philip Zimbardo, at Stanford University, set out to learn just how prison affects a person psychologically. The results of this experiment were shocking, to say the least, and led that team of researchers, and many others, to question just how bad the prison systems of America really are. The results of this experiment were far more devastating and shocking than anyone involved had imagined.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The principal states that Psychologists should exercise judgment to ensure that their biases or competence does not result in unjust practices. Relative to the Stanford Prison Experiment, Zimbardo was very involved in the experiment, more than a researcher should. He gave himself the role of Superintendent which made him very involved in the experiment to the extent which he could no longer make just decisions. A clear indication of this is when Christina Maslach visited Zimbardo--it was not until she questioned the nature of the experiment that he acknowledge the severity of the situation. His involvement as “Prison Superintendent” clouded his reasonable judgment. As a result, he allowed for the experiment to escalate, all of which was unjust.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this experiment, Professor Zimbardo and his subordinates chose the twenty-four of the most psychologically stable and healthy candidates from over seventy-five undergraduates. The randomly assigned prisoners were then arrested at their homes and processed with the help of local police, getting their mug shots taken, fingerprinted, and issued prison uniforms before being confined to a cell in a Stanford University basement. Those who were assigned prison guard duty were issued guard uniforms and instructed in how to treat the “prisoners”. The “guards” were also issued the wooden police batons as authority symbols and visible threats of physical injury to prisoners, and also wore mirrored sunglasses to prevent prisoner eye contact and add to the depersonalization of the mock prison. The second day of the experiment, the “prisoners” rioted, prompting the prison “guards” to break up the riot by attacking the prisoners with fire extinguishers without the supervision of the research staff. After thirty-six hours, “Prisoner 8612” went into a hysterical rage, and was only released after his suffering was apparent to the researchers. His release started a false rumor of a “prison break”, and the guards dismantled the prison to build in a more “secure” location. People would believe the experiment would be ended at that point, especially since the subjects involved were Stanford undergraduates under the supervision of a respectable university professor. They do not understand that when human beings become too involved in their roles or their society, they become what they and everyone else are acting as, creating a new identity to fit in, rather than fight the system to make it…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971, Philip Zimbardo conducted one of the most infamous experiments known to this day as the Stanford Prison Experiment. Its objective was to understand the effects prisons can have on human behaviour. Zimbardo, together with his research team hypothesized that in a prison environment, the personality traits that are inherent in a person are chiefly responsible for abusive behaviour. His research participants were twenty-four male college students who attended Stanford University. They were interviewed and screened to ensure that they had no criminal records, medical conditions or any psychological disorders. Through a random coin flip, half of the participants were then given the role of prisoner, while the other half were given the role…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. What particular personal challenges or characteristics, or conditions in the society and the profession of psychology had the greatest impact upon your development as a psychologist?…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apa Code Of Ethics Essay

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For Instance, The Stanford Prison Experiment carry out by Haney, Banks & Zimbardo is known for its significant study but also its violation of ethics in psychology (Haney, Banks & Zimbardo, 1973). The concept of this experiment was to determine the role of conformity in an experiment act to establish the correlation between prison guards and prisoners in the prison system(Haney, Banks & Zimbardo, 1973). Although, its success, the experiment received immense condemnation due to the ethical violations that occurred during the experiment. Philip Zimbardo failed to stop the experiment as soon as it was getting out of hand. Zimbardo and his colleagues were determining to see how far the experiment could go they failed to see the damage it was doing to their…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychology’s most famous figure is also one of the most influential and controversial thinkers of the twentieth century.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays