Preview

Philanthropy Practices Between Minority Groups

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
348 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philanthropy Practices Between Minority Groups
The most important point from the readings is that philanthropy is not and should not be thought of as affluent whites giving to poor non-whites. Each racial/ethnic group, and even the communities within these groups have different philanthropic practices, but they all make important contributions to society. One commonality that I noticed for giving practices between minority groups is their tendency to send money “back home” to family or friends who are still living in their home countries. This is most commonly seen in Latino and Asian groups, and is an informal way of giving--an important practice that receives less recognition than giving to a big name nonprofit. African American groups’ informal giving goes, according to Lisa Duran in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For a nation to grow and come together there must be reparations in various form to correct these past injustices. He presents several types of reparations that could ease the white guilt, as well as acknowledging the effects of racism towards African Americans. One type of reparation he discusses is a financial one involving calculating the wag gape between white and black Americans, the difference would go to African Americans for perhaps ten years or so (Coates). A financial reparation not only recognizes the past of discrimination in the workforce that largely caused poverty in black communities but it would also aide poor black Americans that have suffered because of this discrimination. Another form is a bill that has been proposed in congress serval times called the HR 40, the Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act (Coates).…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Carnegie believes in a system based on principles and responsibility. His attempt to show people a way to reach an accommodation between individualism and fairness. The gospel of wealth is primarily about the dispersion of wealth and the responsibilities of those who have it. Carnegie thinks that inheritance is detrimental to society because it does not do any good for the inheritor or the community. Inheritance promotes laziness and the lack of a good work ethic doesn’t not teach the young sons of wealthy men to make money for themselves or help those in community they live in Carnegie believes that charity is also bad and instead of handouts money should be given to those in a position to help the needy themselves.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    "The Gospel of Wealth" has been called "the most famous document in the history of American philanthropy. It described the responsibility of distribution of wealth by the new upper class of the self made rich. The main point of Carnegie’s essay was the danger of allowing large sums of money to be passed into the hands of people or organizations that were not capable of dealing with money adequately. His solution was for the wealthy entrepreneur to assume the responsibility of distributing their fortune in a way that it would be put to good use and not wasted on irresponsible expenditures. Carnegie states, “Of every thousand dollars spent in so-called charity today, it is probable that $950 is unwisely spent; so spent, as to produce the very evils which it proposes to mitigate…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is only after understanding who you are can you truly make a difference in society. For Dr. Nobles, De-Africanization is way that African Americans have been differentiated from…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kenji Yoshino argues in his essay covering: The hidden assault on our civil rights “Civil rights has always been to permit people to pursue the human flourishing without limitation based on bias Focusing on law prevents us from seeing the revolutionary breadth of that aspiration, as law has limited civil rights to particular groups.”(235). Kenji Yoshino has a great point, what still exist in our structural and economical world is inequality among different, gender, races, discrimination of race and culture and all other areas of society. This is important because to what extend are the lawmakers going to get involved. If lawmakers are going to keep ignoring their constituents than they’re not helping fight social inequality. Lawmakers are ignoring the actually needs and wants of their constituents.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine a world without color, pain, or feelings. It sounds terrible. The Giver is a book about a community that people in the community do not have to be worry about anything. In other words, they never experience the joy of life and success. Jonas’ community is a strict community to avoid negative emotions. However (TRANS), there are many things that citizens are not allowed to do by themselves. The purpose of this paragraph is to contrast the Jonas’ community to our community. First of all, in Jonas’ community everyone lives by the community’s rules. It means their food, their family, their decisions are chosen for them because they are under the community’s control. However, in our community people can make their own decisions and choose their favorite food to eat. Second, in Jonas’s community the Elders control the population. It means that kids are not raised in a house. They are raised in a center for a year and will be given to family, but (TRANS) the Elders are the ones to decide who can be assigned to care for children. However, in our community people have their own children and it does not matter how many children they want to have (INF). Another difference is that when they turn twelve, the children are given a job assignment and start training (GER) for their job, and after that, they work more till they become a responsible adult. By way of contrast, in our community people can start working (GER) whenever they want, and they might want to work (INF) less when they get older (COMP). In conclusion, we would realize that our decisions, emotions, and differences might make our life harder (COMP), so it would be great to be happy with the present life. Never make your life as same as (COMP) Jonas’ community because you are never going to feel the life. A world without color, pain, or feelings should be a destination you would never…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    can food drive experience

    • 1519 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We chose to donate to Faith Tabernacle church of god which happens to be a predominantly African American church in Southfield MI. Sadly 50.1 million Americans struggle to put food on the table. More than 1 in 5 children is…

    • 1519 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Prodigality and meanness are excesses and defects with regard to wealth” (N.E. IV.1) in book four section one he speaks of generosity and how it doesn’t regard to just money or material goods. How you spend your time and act to others shows true virtue in terms to generosity. He follows by talking about the Liberal man and how he is the most loved of all virtuous characters because he is dependant on giving. Giving can be done by anybody at any time, however the liberal man, “will give for the sake of the noble,…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ioanide argues that even though Blacks and Whites share similar incomes, work history and family structure, their relationship of wealth and inheritance is very different. This is because many African Americans receive less inheritance by their parents, creating the minority group to struggle to maintain a decent lifestyle. In order to explain the racial gap between the dominant group and the working class the author looks at the history of the United States to examine why White Americans have more wealth than people of color. The author suggests that Whites were not victims of discrimination or suffered any kind of financial hardship unlike the African American community. Other argument that Ioanide makes is that today more celebrities are using their power to promote the ideas of hard work and merit within the African American community. This article is relevant to social work practice because as Social workers are main responsibility is to deliver the same service to every individual regarded of the gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation and…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bouckaert, L., & Vandenhove, J. (1998). Business ethics and the management of non-profit institutions. Journal of Business Ethics 17(9), 1073-1081…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Race refers to someone's physical traits, which includes bone shape and skin, hair, or eye colour whilst ethnicity refers to cultural factors, consisting of nationality, lifestyle, ancestry, and language. (Joseph F. Healey 2016) Ethnicity defines as a shared cultural heritage that is primarily based on beliefs and the values that they have. While in the workplace having ethic minorities makes a successful business because it is beneficial as it attracts people from diverse labour markets. Managing diversity promotes competitive edge by recruiting the best people for the job, regardless of ethnicity, age, gender or other individual characteristics. (Cornelius 32-60). Due to less diverse people in the field of journalism The Guardian launched…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine you are homeless. You have no money, no job, and, obviously, no home. Every day you wake up, grab your sign, and stand on a corner. Sometimes people stop, but most of the time, cars whiz past you without thinking twice. Now imagine you are homeless, but this time it is during the Depression. How is it different? Do people help you in the same way as they would in today’s society? Our society’s attitudes towards homelessness and poverty are both similar and different than society’s attitudes during the depression.…

    • 738 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Income Inequality

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the essay “The Gospel of Wealth” Andrew Carnegie says that the rich should invest their money to do good for the public (396). He argues that the rich should do something with their money instead of put it to waste when they die. Many people tend to not enjoy their money; they save until one day they realize it is too late. Carnegie believes that this money should be put into good instead of waste. One way that Carnegie mentions that the rich should do is charity. He used the example of a free public library in New York City to support his argument. A public library helps families and children economically, and educationally. If the children get the education they need they have better opportunities and less chance of living in poverty in the near future. Carnegie tries to convince us that; if the rich invest money into improving the community then there will be a slight chance of less poverty. I agree, but it also depends on the person. Some people take advantage of the help they are getting from government or even from higher class society. Carnegie idea could work but it may also backfire and make things worse. If the poor start to rely on the rich to help them with their problems, they may not do anything about it because they know there will be someone to “bail” them out of trouble. This is a bad thing because people would not want to start making effort to start doing better. A great example in America today is unemployment. Today the citizens receive unemployment money if they are layed or fired. Carnegie might say many people take advantage of…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philanthropy provides an alternative to taxation. How can this come under scrutiny? Millions of Americans contribute to different organizations and causes, among the largest contributors are big business and the rich. Everyone is eligible for this alternative to taxation. But the author brings to the reader, “We are supposed to applaud philanthropy – The very word connotes altruism and ‘giving back’—but Walton and Wal-Mart giving serves as a reminder that philanthropy provides an alternative to taxation, a way for rich people and corporations to decide what to do with their extra money, as opposed to letting the rest of us decide through our elected governments.”(Featherstone, 510). But this statement is flawed in many ways’ she isolates rich people and corporations but all American’s can ‘benefit’ from this tax write off that our elected governments put in place. The concept that this is a terrible thing is too altruistic in the worst way. The way that people spend their money should remain ultimately upon them. Only in an utopia would it be great if we all shared but the idea of having others choose how to spend your money is ultimately selfish on the taking end, whether greed is involved or…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Audience: Carnegie’s view on wealth was expressed to mainly those who were wealthy organizations or individuals that could have been using their financial advantages in charitable and philanthropic ways to better humanity.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays