Preview

Phi1101 Study Notes

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
280 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Phi1101 Study Notes
PHI 1101A | May 2, 13
LECTURE 1

The basic toolbox of critical thinking consists of: * Statement * Premise * Conclusion * Argument
Problems with how we think: * Self-interested thinking – accepting a claim solely on the grounds that it advances or coincides with our interests - too much focus on ourselves * Ex. “I’m against gun control, because I’m a hunter” * Arguments should have more solid reasons, other than one’s own self interest * Group thinking – we are all members of groups (social classes, religions etc.) and all of these groups, intentionally or not, exert pressure on our views. * Peer pressure - pressure from one’s peers to believe or do the things the group does * Stereotyping – drawing conclusions about people without sufficient reasons

Problems with what we think: * We all have a world view * Part of the world view of critical thinking – the world is publically understandable * Ex. 2 + 2 = 4 / whales are mammals / the world is flat * The fact that we believe this statement does not make it true / false * Described as being objectively true * Subjective relativism: the view that truth depends solely on what someone believes – the truth is relative to the individual (what each person believes it to be) * Problems with this include: if we could make something true by just believing it we could never be wrong * Its self- defeating since it involves logical contradiction * Consider the statement: all truth is relative * Social relativism - the view that the truth is relative to to societies or groups. Also known as a cultural relativism: different cultures believe different things. Who are we to say that other societies are wrong? * Problems with this include: it implies that societies are infallible, it involves a logical contradiction

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Geometry Outline

    • 2859 Words
    • 12 Pages

    * So, what you want to prove must be true – the opposite of where you started.…

    • 2859 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first problem that stands out to me is the belief argument. This argument says that if DCT is true, then morality exists only if God exists.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Hick said ‘In order to say something may possibly be true, we must say something which may possibly be false’. In other words the Falsification Principle demands that believers should be able to say what would…

    • 1026 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to www.gotquestions.org/cultural-relavitsim, cultural relativism is the view that all beliefs, customs, and ethics are related to the social norms and culture that one comes from. In other words, right and wrong or good and bad are culture-specific, meaning that what is reflected moral in one society may be reflected immoral in another. Therefore, since no collective standard of morality subsists, no one has the right to judge another society’s customs or to hold one society as better than the other. Ethical relativism is closely related to cultural relativism in that ethical relativism views truth as capricious and not absolute. What establishes rights and wrongs is determined merely by the individual or by humanity. Truth is not objective, henceforth there can be no objective standard which applies to all cultures. It is a matter of personal opinion of what is right and wrong or good and bad, so no society can pass judgment on another society.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural relativism is the principle that an individual human's beliefs and activities should be understood by others in terms of that individual's own culture. This principle was established as axiomatic in anthropological research by Franz Boas in the first few decades of the 20th century and later popularized by his students. Boas first articulated the idea in 1887: "...civilization is not something absolute, but ... is relative, and ... our ideas and conceptions are true only so far as our civilization goes."[1] but did not actually coin the term "cultural relativism."…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To understand what our world really is, we must first understand ourselves, rather, our own thoughts. Yet in saying that, the mind itself is too complex for a mere human to understand, let alone to understand the entire world. “If our brain was simple enough for us to understand it, we would be so stupid we wouldn’t be able to understand it after all.” (Jostein Gaarder, 1990, p. 141)…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Peer pressure “argument”: A desire for acceptance can motivate us to accept a claim not because of its merits, but because we will gain someone’s approval (or will avoid having approval withdrawn).…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If someone asked you to jump off a bridge with two of your friends, would you do it? Peer pressure is defined by social pressure from members of one's peer group to take a certain action, adopt certain values, or otherwise conform in order to be accepted. There are many types of peer pressure; a common one is group pressure.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Egocentricity means confusing what we see and think with reality. When under the influence of egocentricity, we think that the way we see things is exactly the way things are. Egocentricity manifests* itself as an inability or unwillingness to consider others' points of view, a refusal to accept ideas or facts that would prevent us from getting what we want (or think we want). In its extreme forms, it is characterized by a need to be right about everything, a lack of interest in consistency and clarity, an all or nothing attitude ("I am 100% right; you are 100% wrong."), and a lack of self-consciousness of one's own thought processes. The egocentric individual is more concerned with the appearance of truth, fairness, and fair mindedness, than with actually being correct, fair, or fair minded. Egocentricity is the opposite of critical thought. It is common in adults as well as in children.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For it is held, meaning of statement ought to be spelled out in what would verify if not simplify the conditions of its truth…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Think carefully about the issue presented in the quotation & either support or refute its main idea.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychology ch. 1

    • 1115 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Naïve realism- belief that we see the world precisely as it is (people thought the world was flat)…

    • 1115 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In life, people always encounter moments, where they cannot verify whether it is true or false. These moments are the one who triggers debate and research. Truth and falseness ranges from the rate of relative to the absolute. But can we really say that there are no absolute distinctions between what is true or false? Our own opinions and perceptions are the reason why the question exists. Our brain decides from where we can see the viewpoint of things. Maybe it’s a coincidence that you and me have the same opinion. But it doesn’t prove that there are no absolute distinctions between the two of them. That is why I’m agreeing with the statement. Explanations on why I decided to do so can be discussed in the subjects of AoK, such as the arts and social sciences. These subjects that I chose has proofs that can verify the statement.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    * The truth value of a statement is not proven by logicians but of empirical scientists, researchers and private detectives.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    logical empericism

    • 6442 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Nevertheless, there are other sentences that may be more serious and widely believed, but not so easily seen as false. The point is: the sentences themselves give no clues on whether they are true or false, or refer to something real or unreal. What can be said about all of this?…

    • 6442 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays