Preview

Phi/105 Week 8 Final Project Outline

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
793 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Phi/105 Week 8 Final Project Outline
SLIDE 1
INTRODUCTION
IS THERE AN AFTERLIFE? DOES IT HAVE AN AFFECT THE WAY WE LIVE NOW?
AMANDA DUKE
PHI 105 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SLIDE 2
DESCARTES (1596-1650)
“I THINK; THEREFOR I AM”
THE ONTILOGICAL ARGUMENT: A method of proof which uses intuition and reason alone; examines the concept of God, and states if we can conceive of the greatest possible being, then it must exist.
Speaker Notes: Descartes had strong belief in dualism; meaning that one possess materialistic and non-materialistic form such as body and soul. Dualism allows for the survival of the non-material element (soul), that the soul is immortal and continues after the death of the body. It takes belief to think that there is an afterlife. He said everything you think you know is actually made of belief and something must exist for you to even ask if it exists.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SLIDE 3
TO BELIEVE OR NOT TO BELIEVE?

Speaker Notes: A weak point in this argument is the lack of actual concrete facts. Most of the argument is a sort of “What if?” theory. A different outcome can be theorized when bold statements are made. Beliefs are instilled through interaction in society. You must have heard of an idea before it came to mind in order to think of it. Therefore, it is someone else’s idea and not your own.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SLIDE 4
My thoughts…
Everyone has their own right to believe in what they want to believe. Speaker Notes: From a child, a person is taught different things and told what to believe. Throughout life a person will come across many different beliefs.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    PHI103 week 1 assignment
    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    PHI103 week 1 assignment

    It is said that knowing the difference between inference and assumptions is a very important intellectual skill. I am going to be focusing on the two elements and giving a few examples on how they are connected as well.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    PHI210 STUDENT GUIDE 1

    • 6304 Words
    • 31 Pages

    PHI210 STUDENT GUIDE 1

    Kirby, G. R., & Goodpaster, J.R. (2007). Thinking: An interdisciplinary approach to critical and creative thought (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.…

    • 6304 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phi1101 Study Notes
    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Phi1101 Study Notes

    * Group thinking – we are all members of groups (social classes, religions etc.) and all of these groups, intentionally or not, exert pressure on our views.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment
    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Substance Dualism Theory
    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes Substance Dualism Theory

    Based upon the belief that the mind and body are two separate entities, philosophers, such as Rene Descartes, support the Substance Dualism theory of mind, arguing that the mind, which is a thinking entity, may exist without the body, which is a physical extension, because it is its own individual substance of matter. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, he puts all concepts of previous certainty into question, intentionally leaving the reader with skepticism towards the concept of knowledge and mental capacity at large. Further, he continues to contend that the mind is distinctly different than the body and can be innovated due to its ability to think, whereas the body is merely a tangible and measureable dimension with no greater abilities, such as thinking or experiencing emotion. Additionally, Descartes further describes the ideas held by Substance Dualists through detailing that under this theory of mind, all entities are…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay

    Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God and consider the view that, while it may strengthen a believer’s faith, it has no value for the non ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mark Howard's Argument Analysis
    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mark Howard's Argument Analysis

    Among the arguments considered in this paper as rational evidence for belief in God, I found the ontological argument to be the most difficult for which to muster support. Of course I agree that…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God
    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God

    There are 3 main arguments that each seek to prove the existence of God; the Ontological, Cosmological, and Teleological Arguments. Each is different in its approach, but all arrive at the same conclusion. Ontological Argument argues God’s existence from the assumption of the existence a “Greatest Thing that can ever be conceived.” From there, it argues that in order for something to be “The Greatest Thing ever” it must exist physically (that is outside of the mind). The Cosmological Argument argues that since everything in the universe is contingent (or is dependent on other things for its existence), there must be a first cause that set the universe in motion.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain Anselms Ontological Argument
    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain Anselms Ontological Argument

    Anselm wanted to prove the existence of God, so he proposed the ontological argument. The ontological argument is deductive, and uses a priori reasoning. This means that it starts with a statement that is known to be true solely through definition (God is the greatest conceivable being) and develops the implications of this statement in order to reach a reasonable conclusion. The deductive reasoning allows him to simply showing what the definition means.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Rhetorical Analysis
    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes Rhetorical Analysis

    He believes that there is a chance that he is imagining life. When a person envisions, he or she basically designs thoughts that exist to be judged by the brain. The method in which thoughts are created should not always be valid, and due to this they cannot be right all the time. One can have the possibility of some substance that does not exist, for example, an alarm, and this does not represent any issue. Descartes looks at the observations people have in our sleep to those people have when they are alert, these two scenarios are closely identical. He reasons that there is no complete approach to recognize being conscious from being asleep. Nonetheless, he keeps up that there are sure things that would be ignorant to question. He considers a few of his earlier opinions as having a chance of containing doubtfulness. Descartes believes since he thinks therefore he must exist meaning his own being in reality is…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Teleological Argument
    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Teleological Argument

    These three main arguments include the ontological, cosmological, and teleological arguments. The teleological argument has evolved from antiquity and has been termed the physico-theological argument, argument from design, intelligent argument design, and the fine-tuned universe argument. The basic concept of the argument states that the world shows evidence of a designer because of its perfection, harmony, and consistency. The World Library defines teleological as:…

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Defense Of The Ontological Argument Essay
    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Defense Of The Ontological Argument Essay

    In this essay I will first explain the ontological argument and my reasons for choosing it. I will then discuss why I believe it is a better account for the existence of god than the teleological argument and the cosmological argument.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Ontological Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ontological Argument For The Existence Of God

    People today and people 300 years ago have looked towards religion, and god specifically to answer the un-questionable. The Ontological Argument is a deductive argument that attempts to show that its premises lead to a logical conclusion, which can’t be doubted. Philosophers have attempted to show that the phrase “God Exists” is a logical statement in that it is logically impossible for it not to be the case, just as it is impossible for a bachelor to not be an unmarried man. The ontological argument proves gods existence because of its apriori…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ontological Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Ontological Argument For The Existence Of God

    One of the most interesting arguments for the Existence of God comes from Anselm and the Ontological argument. According to the Ontological argument, there is no reason to go out and look for physical evidence of God’s existence. The ontological argument is based completely on reason and comes from the concept of a “being than which no greater can be conceived.” Anselm suggested that if such a “being” does not truly exist then a greater being can be conceived. But how does this make any sense?…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ontological Argument
    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ontological Argument

    The ontological argument is an attempt to refute skepticism of God and prove His existence through reason alone. The philosopher, Saint Anselm, presented his work on the ontological argument, or argument from reason, in his text the Proslogium. The argument, on the surface, is very logically convincing and attempts to allure even the skeptic of God. Anselm tries to show the proposition of God exists based on analytic necessary truth – which will be discussed later in further detail. This paper will explain and assess the deductive and a priori nature of the argument, address the objections…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics