Phaedo Examines Wether the Human Soul Is Immortal or Not

Topics: Soul, Death, Life Pages: 3 (883 words) Published: December 13, 2005
The Phaedo is a story that is set on the last day of Socrates' life. The dialogue examines whether the human soul is immortal or not. Socrates does not fear death, but he looks it straight in the eye and thinks this is what a philosopher practices for. Socrates believes that the soul is immortal, and therefore, outlasts the body. Socrates defends his argument by trying to establish that things come to be from their opposite. In his argument, he implies that all things that can change are eternal. I believe that Socrates' argument makes some good points, but is not entirely convincing. Not all things that are subject to change are eternal I believe, which could bring about some questions to his argument. I believe that he is correct in thinking that the soul is immortal, but there might be some flaws in his argument.

Socrates believes that the soul is more enduring than the body. One way he establishes this argument is on the basis all things that come to be and have an opposite "must necessarily come to be from their opposite and from nowhere else" (70e). For example, if someone becomes awake, then this person is asleep before he or she wakes. Socrates also uses the example of something that becomes smaller must have been larger in order to become smaller. Socrates says, "Then if something smaller comes to be, it will come from something larger before, which became smaller?" (71a). Then, Socrates takes into account that life and death are opposites. He uses the belief that dying is going from living to being dead. Therefore, being alive comes from being dead since they are opposites as well. If this is true, then one existed before birth. The body did not exist before birth, so the body does not only compromise a person. The soul does, too, and it is separate from the body. Since a person is comprised of the body and the soul, the soul apparently exists before birth. Also, since the body obviously dies at death, then the soul exists after...


Cited: Plato. "Phaedo." Five Dialogues. Translated by Gube, G. Revised by Cooper, J. Hackett Publishing Co. Indianapolis, IN. 2002. 2nd Edition. 93-154.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • My Immortal Soul Essay

    ...Costanzo PHI 1000C April 29, 2010 The Immortality of the Soul Plato has roused many readers with the work of a great philosopher by the name of Socrates. Through Plato, Socrates lived on generations after his time. A topic of Socrates that many will continue to discuss is the idea of “an immortal soul”. Although there are various works and dialogues about this topic it is found to be best explained in The Phaedo. It is fair to say that the mind may wonder when one dies what exactly happens to the beloved soul, the giver of life often thought of as the very essence of life does it live on beyond the body, or does it die with it? Does the soul have knowledge of the past if it really does live on? In Plato’s The Phaedo, Plato recounts Socrates final days before he is put to death. Socrates has been imprisoned and sentenced to death for corrupting the youth of Athens and not following the rights of Athenian religion.[1] Socrates death brings him and his fellow philosophers Cebes, Simmions, Phaedo, and Plato into a perplex dialogue about this notion of an afterlife and what does one have to look forward to after death. Death is defined as the separation of the body from the soul. In The Phaedo death has two notions a common one which is the basic idea that the soul dies and the physical, idea that...

    Read More
    1605 Words 7 Pages
  • Immortal Soul Essay

    ...Running head: THE IMMORTAL SOUL The immortal soul Michelle Bell Southwest Tennessee Community College Introduction to Philosophy Dr. Melvin Tuggle November 15, 2007 The immortal soul Where were you - your soul, your spirit - before you were born? If the soul is immortal, did it have a "life" before your birth? Plato believed that the soul existed prior to our existence in human form. In Plato’s theory, “ Our souls possess knowledge of the Forms before we are born, and with determination, intelligence, and virtue, we can enjoy a blessed communion with the Forms after death”, (Melchert, 2002, p.143). In Plato’s reasoning, man is meant to attain goodness and return to the Form through the experiences of the transmigration of the soul. Plato’s theory also suggested that a higher supreme being as the creator of the world. The Holy Bible states in Job 32:8: “But there is a spirit in man and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding”, (Job, 2002, p. 356). As I believer of the Lord God’s Word, I faithfully believe that we inherit our spiritual being from God; therefore in this paper I will construct why I agree with Plato’s theories. However, Scientists tell us that humans evolved from apes but Plato saw man's existence as divided into...

    Read More
    553 Words 3 Pages
  • The Immortality of the Soul in Plato's Phaedo Essay

    ...Dao Le Prof. Mark Cronin HU 102 - HD April 2, 2012 The Immortality of the Soul in Plato’s Phaedo Among Plato’s dialogues, which serve to honor the realm of philosophy in general and Socrates’s life in particular, the Phaedo dramatically and poignantly portrays the death scene of Socrates. The Phaedo evokes such tragic sentiments of pity and fear while at the same time glorifies Socrates as the martyr for the truth. He dies because of human’s injustice yet faces his own death with extraordinary serenity and fearlessness; he devotes his whole life for philosophy and in fact practices it until the last minutes. In this dialogue, the philosophical discussion is about the soul. However, as a dualist, for the most part Socrates takes for granted the existence of the soul while arguing for the immortality of the soul, which eventually turns to a conclusion that the soul does survive the death of the body and it is immortal. On the opening of the Phaedo, Socrates’s readiness to die and his astounding composure before his death utterly surprise both his friends and the audience: “the man appeared happy in both manner and words as he died nobly and without fear” (Plato 58e). As Cicero says, Socrates at his death “spoke in language which made him seem not as one thrust out to die but as one ascending to the heavens” (Ahrensdorf 1). The...

    Read More
    2893 Words 12 Pages
  • Phaedo: Soul and Body Essay

    ...Jordan Parker Philosophy 251- 503 February 14, 2014 Phaedo: Soul & Body As one may see throughout their life, people have different points of view. Plato and I share the same views on the Argument from Affinity up until a certain point. I believe that while you are alive, even before you are alive, your soul is a part of you and that that soul will be only yours, and once your life ends here on Earth, your soul goes to Heaven, Hell, or Purgatory, meaning that I do believe the soul is both imperishable and immortal. While those are my beliefs and the first one I will explore, I will still explore other beliefs throughout my paper, as well. The second view I will explore is Socrates’ view; he says that the soul is immortal and imperishable, while the body is mortal and perishable. He says that the soul will long to return to the flesh, meaning that it will find another body to inhabit when the body that it was previously residing in is gone, and that this cycle continues on for a good while, because he believes that you can’t achieve your full greatness from just one life/body. The third and final view I will explore is Cebes’ view; he says that the soul and body are separate, and that the soul is immortal and imperishable, while the body is not, but that they don’t go to a higher...

    Read More
    2302 Words 6 Pages
  • Phaedo Essay

    ...Nam Le Phil 210 9/22/09 Phaedo 1. a) 60b: Socrates remarks that pain and pleasure may seem to be opposites since we never experience both at the same time, but they are intimately connected to one another. Rarely, do we find one without the other. The pleasure that he experiences from being released from his chains is directly related to the pain that he experienced from being enchained. b) 67b: Death is the separation of the soul from the body. We shall be closest to knowledge (in live) if we refrain as much as possible from association with the body and do not fall to bodily pleasures but live a purified life. Philosophers are only concerned with the well-being of their souls and the best kind of wisdom comes from reason alone, when distanced as far as possible from the distractions of the body. Opposites contrasted by each other, each is necessary for the recognition of the other. c) 68b: Only a philosopher who does not fear death can truly be said to possess courage and self-control. The philosopher exchanges pleasures for pleasures, pains for pains, fears for fears for wisdom, which is the only thing of true value. This pursuit of wisdom will cleanse the philosopher of all the impurities of bodily life and its passions, preparing him for a better afterlife with the gods. Contrary properties from different points of view. d) 70d: Argument from Opposites. Everything comes to be from its opposite....

    Read More
    1005 Words 5 Pages
  • Essay on Phaedo

    ...Immortality of the Soul Collin O’Gorman September 27, 2012 Philosophy 1001: Human Nature Section 104 During anyone’s last hours on Earth, they would probably want to spend time with loved ones and reflect on everything that has happened in their life. However, Socrates had different intentions; he instead wanted to spend the little time he had left to philosophize one last time with his friends. The topic of discussion was the soul and Socrates’ goal was to prove to everyone that while our bodies may not be immortal, the soul is. One of his main explanations is through the use of the argument of contraries. Using this argument, Socrates successfully convinces his peers that the soul must exist outside of the body. Even though he may have received acceptance from those closest to him at the time of his death, Socrates fails to differentiate between the soul and the physical body and to explain the creation of the soul. This then leads one to question the validity and effectiveness of the argument of contraries. Socrates begins his explanation by stating that “all contraries come from their own contrary” (Phaedo 70E). He initiates his argument using examples of some fundamental contraries to make sure that Cebes and Simmias have a solid understanding of the main argument being proven. Socrates uses the contrary of bigger and littler, and...

    Read More
    1004 Words 5 Pages
  • Why Does Plato Think That the Soul Is Immortal? Is He Right? Discuss with Close Reference to Phaedo 102a-107b. Essay

    ...the soul is immortal? Is he right? Discuss with close reference to Phaedo 102a-107b. The Phaedo is Plato’s attempt to convince the reader of the immortality of the soul using four main arguments. These include the argument of affinity, recollection, Forms and the law of opposites. In the final passage of the Phaedo, (Grube, 2002:102a-107b), Plato provides his ‘Final Proof’, despite seeming like the most conclusive argument it is not necessarily the most convincing. Plato has some good points and fair reasoning to believe in the immortality of the soul, however his arguments often seem to make large assumptions without any concrete backing. In this essay I will attempt to expose the flaws in Plato’s argument whilst showing how the conclusion may still be plausible. Plato begins with the argument that opposites come from each other and continues to explain how Forms can never admit their opposite. Plato makes a distinction between accidental and essential properties; to finally show that the soul is immortal by the fact that life is its essential property, therefore cannot admit its opposite, death. In the first passage (102a-103c), Plato seems to be returning to an earlier theory of the law of opposites. At 70c to 72a, Plato makes the argument that all opposites come from each other; ‘when something comes to be larger it must necessarily...

    Read More
    1603 Words 7 Pages
  • Understanding Aristotle's Views of the Human Soul Essay

    ...Aristotle Born in the year of 384 B.C. Aristotle was seen as conventional for his time, for he regarded slavery as a natural course of nature and believed that certain people were born to be slaves due to the fact that their soul lacked the rational part that should rule in a human being; However in certain circumstances it is evident that Aristotle did not believe that all men who were slaves were meant to be slaves. In his book Politics, Aristotle begins with the Theory of The Household, and it is here that the majority of his views upon slavery are found. With the beginning of Chapter IV, Aristotle's idea of slavery is clearly defined. "The instruments of the household form its stock of property : they are animate and inanimate : the slave is an animate instrument, intended (like all the instruments of the household) for action, and not for productions." This distinction between action and production, is based upon the understanding that 'production' is a course in which a result is desired beyond the immediate act of doing. Where as, the simple act of completing a task is identified as 'action'. Aristotle, who believed that life was action and not production theorized that slaves were instruments of life and were therefore needed to form a complete household. In fact Aristotle went as far as to say that a slave was comparable to a tame animal, with their only divergence in the fact that a slave could apprehend reason. For he...

    Read More
    1288 Words 6 Pages

Popular Essays

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free