Preview

Peterpan

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
495 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Peterpan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR

(COMMERCIAL DIVISION)

CIVIL SUIT NO:D-22NCC-2117-2010

BETWEEN

FOO CHEONG SENG
(NRIC No:551210-08-5403) …PLAINTIFF

AND

ABADI UTAMA GLOBAL SDN BHD …DEFENDANT
(Company No: 847474-T)

SUMMARY OF DEFENCE AND COUNTERCLAIM

The Defendant is owned by one Dato' Abang Haji Khalid (hereinafter referred to as Dato' Khalid) and one Eshlie Bin Ahmad Nawawie (hereinafter referred to as Eshlie).

The Plaintiff commenced this suit to inter alia claim for the balance purchase price of shares amounting to RM2,100,000.00 in one Global Bonanza (“the Company”) sold to the Defendant on or about 1.9.2009.

The Plaintiff approached and offered to sell the said shares to the Defendant after he was not in good terms with another Director of the Company at the material time, Tony Goh Sook San.

At that material time, Tony Goh Sook San had commenced an action against the Plaintiff in Kuala Lumpur High Court vide Civil Suit No: D-22-NCC-95-2009 on behalf of the Company inter alia for breach of fiduciary duties and making secret profits by misusing his position as Managing Director of the Company to change the technology provider to his own company without the board's approval.

As a result the hostile relationship, Tony Goh Sook San was unwilling to put in more monies to fund the expenditures of the Company.

As such, the Plaintiff approached the Defendant for monies. However, they were unwilling to do so due to the fact that they were minority shareholders of the company. It is at this juncture that the Plaintiff offered to sell all his shares in the Company.

Initially, the Defendant did not accept the offer due to concerns about Tony Goh Sook San's allegations. However, the Plaintiff assured that the change of technology was necessary, and would still be capable to meet the required bio-diesel American standard quality ASTM 6751 and European quality EN 14214. It is on this assurance that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    transition to a publicly traded company. However, the IPO also brought along a major class action lawsuit…

    • 849 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HCC 40, PC 3: Court Case

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Corcker May argue that each shareholders must announce that within 30 days they`re going to to make a deposition of their stock and within 30 days a special meeting of all of the stock holders shall be called by corporation which was not actually held.although two-third of the shareholders decided to merge with Booth Creek.because it was not a small corporations it was not possible to set restrictions on transferability of shares.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief No 1

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff and Defendant: The plaintiff/appellant is Harvestons Securities, Inc. The defendant/appellee is Narnia Investments, Ltd.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Here, plaintiffs alleged that, “Defendants’ reckless stewardship of Veeco, particularly their failure to institute appropriate controls and oversight of all areas of the Company’s business, has exposed the Company to potentially significant fines and legal liability, has substantially impaired the Company’s market capitalization, has eroded the Company’s goodwill and trust in the market place, and has threatened the Company’s overseas sales” [pp. 274-275].…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to the factual allegations, Plaintiffs’ grievances arose out of a 2013 reorganization of the “Covis enterprise”. Plaintiffs argue that, before the reorganization, they held valuable profits interests in Covis Holdings LP (“CLP”). But, as part of the reorganization hey exchanged those interests for less valuable profits interests in Covis US Holdings, LLC (“C-US”), in reliance on Defendants’ actions.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Here, plaintiff sufficiently set forth the terms of the parties' Property Settlement Agreement concerning plaintiff's interest in defendant's Deferred Compensation Agreement The issue of the case…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answear

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    B) The proper plaintiffs in the action are the shareholders, under the relief from oppression provision.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Notice to Complete

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages

    • Plaintiffs sue for forfeiture of the deposit and for damages for a deficiency on re sale.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    dows bid for rohm and haas

    • 4941 Words
    • 19 Pages

    The case presents an American company Dow, producer of commodity chemicals, who is in the final stages of acquiring another company Rohm and Haas. Dow’s CEO has been working for four years to transform Dow from a producer of low-value, highly cyclical commodity chemicals to a producer of high-value, specialty chemicals and advanced materials. Rohm is a perfect match for Dow in respect of the strategic and financial perspective. Dow is also pursuing another key deal with Kuwait’s Petrochemical Industries Company (PIC) that was supposed to generate $7 billion cash net of tax which could be used to finance acquisition of specialty chemical maker Rohm & Haas for $18.8 billion all cash deal. However, by late 2008, a sever financial crisis gripped the US markets, causing a substantial decline in asset values. This financial crisis stretched across the entire globe, and the Kuwait based PIC terminated the joint venture with Dow in December 2008. To make matters worse, Dow reported a fourth quarter loss of $1.6 billion. Due to deteriorating market conditions and the credit market freezing up, Dow attempted to back out of its acquisition of Rohm & Haas. In response, Rohm & Haas approached the court to force Dow to complete the the terms of their deal.…

    • 4941 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter the Panderer

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Peter the PandererIn this political speech I have identified the arguments and non-arguments, facts and non-facts, statements that are subjective, and the statements that are relativist ("The Basic Concepts of Critical Thinking," 2013). The arguments I identified would be in these statements that support final claims. The fifth paragraph shows an argument “our community endured the same hard times.” The supporting statement would be Peters father was laid off at the steel mill, then their family did not have enough money for school, and the football season was cancelled due to low funding.…

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The following are questions which should focus the groups on important aspects of the Yeats Valves case. Note the actual case name is Yeats Valves and Controls, Inc. The case number is UV0094. There is also a spreadsheet - that number is UV0184.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alleged Discrimination Case

    • 24564 Words
    • 99 Pages

    They agreed to the shareholder percentages and investment amounts stated in FAC ¶¶ 16-17, which gave Plaintiff a 35% shareholder interest and required him to invest $245,000 (hereinafter the “STOCK AGREEMENT”). However, Plaintiff only invested $100,000 of that into PQRS CORP, and, pursuant to a loan to Plaintiff from TOM, TOM paid the remaining $145,000 into PQRS CORP (FAC ¶ 16(2)(C)). TOM and KENNY each invested the full amounts required into PQRS CORP: $385,000 and $70,000, respectively. The total capital investment was $700,000. There was talk about substantial additional investment by TOM, but such additional investment would be contingent upon a showing of progress and also upon the issuance of additional stock to TOM (which would dilute the stock held by the others). TOM and KENNY entrusted Plaintiff with the day-to-day management of PQRS CORP. Their trust was misplaced. After a period of time, it became clear that Plaintiff did…

    • 24564 Words
    • 99 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Cendant Corporation

    • 5262 Words
    • 22 Pages

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ………………………………………………………… 2 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………. 3 SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………………….. 4-7 COMPANY PROFILE …………………………………………………………… 8 THE OFFICERS INVOLVE …………………………………………………….. 9-15 DISCUSSION ……………………………………………………………………. 16-20 THE SETTLEMENT The settlement with Cendant ………………………………………… 21-22 The settlement with Ernst & Young ……………………………….. 23 THE BREAKUP ………………………………………………………………… 24 CONCLUSION ………………………………………………………………….. 25 RECOMMENDATION ………………………………………………………….. 26 BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………………………………………….. 27 APPENDIX ……………………………………………………………………… 28-30…

    • 5262 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Study Nabisco

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Discuss the background of the case. Who were the players? What prompted this leveraged buyout (LBO)?…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter Pan

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I suddenly, and quite strangely, have found myself conflicted about Peter Pan. I thought I knew the story, believed I was familiar with it. My Mother has used the term "Peter Pan Syndrome" to describe nearly every young member of our family at one time or another. It means you never want to grow up, just like the boy in Walt Disney’s animation. Peter wants to play in Never Land forever and avoid responsibility while careening through the air amid pirates and redskins and a strange yet hopeful band of "Lost Boys." It was all so much fun, and I could never figure out why Wendy and her brothers decided to return home. Obviously, it was because of their parents, but still their sudden longing for the nursery never really rang true for me. Of course, they had to go home because that was what happy endings were all about. Yet Peter was still out there not growing up anyway, so the fun was still to be had. Never Land was not going away so they could leave it behind--leave it for Peter while they went home.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays