Preview

Peter the Great's Decision to Go to War with Sweden

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
963 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Peter the Great's Decision to Go to War with Sweden
Explain why Peter decided to go to war with Sweden. Peter declared war on Sweden in August 1700 with the most important aim of expansion and regaining lost territories. He had also hoped to weaken the power and might of the Swedish empire and in doing this, create a more powerful and prestigious image for Russia as he has tried to do throughout his reign so far. Despite the fact that Peter had not yet completed his conquest of the Ottoman empire in the south, he decided to impose war on Sweden perhaps because in Lee's opinion Sweden was “more immediately vulnerable and exploitable” than Turkey was and so Peter felt the time was right to challenge Sweden and leave his plans in the south, such as breaking through to the Black sea, to embark upon at a later date. Another reason for Peters change in tact could have been because of the recent bitter disappoint of the 30 year truce that had just signed with the Turks. It meant that no Russian ships were allowed on the Black Sea and that the Turks kept control of Kerch. This meant a dead end for Peter in regards to southwards expansion as Kerch blocked access to the Black Sea and it could now not be attacked. This would have been hugely frustrating to Peter considering all of the time effort and resources that had been undertaken to defeat the Turks and would have contributed to his decision to abandon plans in the south and turn his attention to Sweden in the North. Peter also deeply resented the reception he received at Swedish held Riga which Swift describes as “less than warm”- this could also have contributed to Peters decision to attack Sweden. Peters main priority when embarking upon war with Sweden was gain access to the Baltic sea in order to recapture Ingria and Karelia- lands that had been lost to Sweden in the seventeenth century which Peter felt he had a “moral claim” to. Not only would this have meant the partition and therefore weakening of the Swedish empire but would also have gave Russia a more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On one hand Thomas Wolsey’s foreign policy from 1515-29 was successful because he managed to get most of Europe to agree on perpetual peace which had previously been very difficult. This was what Wolsey’s Foreign policy was all about; acting as a mediator between other countries and gaining respect and prestige so this was a great success. In 1518 Wolsey hosted a great conference in London which representatives of the majority of European powers, including Spain and the Holy Roman Emperor, attended and agreed to peace in Europe. Furthermore with the signing of the Treaty by the Pope London became the centre of Christian Europe and meant Wolsey gained support from the Pope, resulting in future ambitions to become Pope, although these did not materialise.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    14. The South's strategy was to defend the homelands and to hold on to as much land as possible until the North gets tired.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolute Monarchs were eithere kings or queens who controlled the complete way of life in the country they ruled. Absolutism is the rule of one person over any given thing. The two rulers that showed absolutism in the documents are Louis 14th and Peter the Great. They were both absolute monarchs and both ruled over large territories.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter the Great was considered on of the greatest czar of all Russian history. He did attempt to build a bigger army to overpower other European countries, but that costed a great deal of money and a raise in taxes. In 1700, he went to war with Sweden, raging on for 21 years. As Russia took on the victory of the battle, they gained power over the Baltic Sea and transformed the Russian Tsardom into the Russian Empire. Soon, Russia became the world’s top producer in cast-iron melting.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ch 18 21 22 ap world vocab

    • 2110 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Why significance: continued policy Russian expansion. He established contacts with western European commerce and culture.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter the Great's reign became the turning point for Russia. Peter's Russia was an enormous, cold empire with almost no transportation; no navy, a limited army, very few decent roads, and few warm water ports. Peter hoped to strengthen his country by westernizing it. After a long visit to England and Holland, he returned to Russia convinced that the empire could only become powerful by imitating western successes. The way he would do this was through military reform, reorganization of the bureaucracy, and relocation of the capital.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion was an important factor when dealing with Louis XIV and Peter the Great. Louis XIV held simple views regarding religion and it was that the king controlled the Catholic Church and that the Church should do his bidding. Louis got into conflict with some popes, but in the end he got his way, because he was more powerful. Louis believed that what was good for him was good for France. He saw no difference between the two. During Peter's reign the Russian Orthodox Church was reformed. The traditional leader of the Church was the Patriarch of Moscow. In 1700, when the office fell vacant, Peter had refused to name a replacement, allowing the Patriarch's deputy to discharge the duties of the office. In 1721, Peter followed the advice of Feofan Prokopovich and erected the Holy Synod, to take the place of the Patriarch and deputy. Peter also implemented a law which stated that no Russian man could join a monastery before the age of 50. He thought that too many able Russian men were being wasted away by clerical work when they could be joining his army. In 18th century Russia, few people lived to over a half century, therefore very few men became monks during Peter's reign. The monks were not pleased with this. In…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both men, Frederick and Peter, possessed great military knowledge, and used that knowledge to defeat their opponents. Each brought his country from ruin, and placed it upon the top ranks of world powers. However, there are also many differences. For example, Frederick the Great focused more on physical actions, discipline, and honor, while Peter the great looked more to advancement in technology, education, and knowledge. Frederick the Great promoted religious freedom throughout all of Prussia. Russia however, under Peter the Great, was entirely devoted toward the Eastern Orthodox…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War between the Indians and the Colonists was unavoidable from the very moment the Pilgrims first set foot on what was to eventually become Massachusetts in 1620. As more and more settlers began arriving over the years, tension between the two began to steadily rise. The settler 's insatiable hunger for land and their increasing mistreatment of the Indians began to break down an already somewhat fragile alliance between the two. The Indians were quickly losing land and their way of life as well to these new settlers and some of them believed the only way to stop this was to go on the offensive and push back them back. The result of this was a short fought war known as King Philip 's War. Though it only lasted a little over a year, it was an exceptionally brutal war that took a huge toll life wise and had a lasting impact on both the English and the Indians for many years to come.…

    • 2168 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Latvia and Great

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    C. Peter the Great gained many territories from 1700 to 1721. Peter the Great led Russia in a war against Sweden. From this war, Russia gained control over territory along the eastern shores of the Baltic Sea. This land gave Russia a direct approach by water to the rest of Europe. Peter attacked Persia and conquered territory along the Caspian Sea. These conquests helped Russia to expand its trade with other countries.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    17th Century Dbq

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The strive for military control of the Atlantic trade routs resulted from mercantilism. The reason wars occurred was because of the competition between the French, Dutch, and English. The Dutch and English traded and fished across the each other’s coastlines, resulting in the thirteen battles fought (Doc.2). The Dutch were a naval state but was recovering from the War of Spanish Succession. In its weak spot, the…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When you think of Peter I or Peter the Great, as he gave himself that name, one thinks of Russia and the many Tsars that ruled this interesting part of the world. To learn of Peter the Great is to explore his life during 1682 . Peter was responsible for bringing Russia out of darkness and into a more civilized country in hopes that Russia, the Motherland, would gain the respect of the rest of the European theatre and become a great power. To do this required many changes and reforms which Peter the Great was responsible for. Although not completely successful in his reforms, Peter the Great had the attitude that he could never fail. Russia, considered by other countries as primitive, was at no point prepared to expand its territory or even be considered a threat by others with all the internal conflicts happening in the diverse land. Peter the Great was the answer to the lack of respect by the Western world, as he was raised differently than any other tsars or family that came before him. This upbringing will show the attitude and demeanor with which Peter the Great was able to meet the needs of the state. Previous to Peter the Great, the state had never…

    • 2206 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Philmas War Analysis

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the article, Philip Ranlet analyzes the possible causes that led to King Philip’s War to deconstruct the misleading interpretations often made by historians about the crucial event. Ranlet’s “Another Look at the Causes of King Philip’s War” contributes to the New Left historiographical discussion because the historians demand the inclusion of those features of our history that explains how we came to be a violent, racist, repressive society. The interpretation of some historians are often influenced by the time period the event is being analyzed. For example, nineteenteenth century historian, John Gorham Palfrey, referred to King Philip as “ ‘an unreasoning and cruel barbarian’ who had no cause to war against the Puritan settlers.”(Ranlet…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    absolutism dbq

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cesar Peter the Great was an autocratic ruler whose actions turned Russia into a powerful force and left him labeled as an absolute king. In August 1700 Peter made the decision to declare war in Sweden. He hoped to open a road from Russia to the west by conquest of the Baltic littoral (Doc. 4). Peter the Great sought warm water ports on the Black Sea in order to expand and westernize Russia. He westernized Russia by imitating western customs like having the men’s beards shaved and ordering traditional coats cut. After winning access to the Baltic littoral Peter the Great ordered construction of St. Petersburg as the new capital. St. Petersburg was an important symbol of Peter the Great’s power because it showed how he expanded Russia’s borders which is one of the many reasons he was an absolute ruler.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the view that English successes in foreign policy outweighed the failures in the years 1511-27 to a certain extent. England managed to successfully pursue a policy of peace making in the years 1514-21 and wolsey was flexible in his diplomacy. However, it could also be argued that Henry’s chief aim, the invasion of France, was unpopular with people at the time and that Henry’s foreign policy was too costly given how little of long term value it brought to England. His allies also often let him down and put their own aims before those of England. In this essay I will be looking at three sources and weighing up the two sides of the argument.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays