Preview

Peter Singer's Views On Animal Rights

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2037 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Peter Singer's Views On Animal Rights
Peter Singer’s animal liberation views on animal rights are wrong and he doesn’t quite get it like William Baxter. William Baxter has a more realistic view on animal rights where Peter Singer is trying to get an impossible utopia that will never exist.
Peter Signers views on animal rights are that we should collectively understand that the pain of another species is no different than the pain of ours as we discussed in class. We, like many other animals feel both pain and pleasure, and are capable of detecting those same feelings in others. This is why Peter Singer takes such a hard stance in animal rights. He also reverts to something called speciesism. “Speciesism the word is not an attractive one but I can think of no better term- is a
…show more content…
You see while in class we covered a scenario of someone kicking a rock down the street. The rock doesn’t care because it’s a rock and doesn’t have feeling, however if someone were to kick a mouse down the street that would be different because the mouse, on the other hand has feelings. Now, I believe William Baxter would not just wake up one day and decide to kick a mouse down the street because he recognizes that there is some cruelty to the animal there. That’s fine in his point of view. People shouldn’t have the right to go around burning the wings off of a fly or intentionally causing harm to an animal because they having nothing better to do. Where the two philosophers differ is on how we should go about doing this. Peter Singer is for higher regulations no matter the cost and William Baxter wants it to take the proper time needed for the market to make the cost …show more content…
Both Islands for some strange reason has a fully working nuclear power plant that both get all of their energy from. The first island again is the one with limited rights and they live in such a mutually beneficial way that they are constantly giving up all their luxuries in order to preserve the natural habit of the other species on the island. I’m going to call this Island the Canadian Island and the other is the American island. So, this Canadian island built its bill of rights so that animals had rights and equal representation just like humans and to kill an animal is no different than killing a person. It even comes with the same punishments of murder. So, in regards to food, they cannot eat meat or fish so they all become vegan on that island. You see chapter seven section three of our texts talks about “Speciesism In

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Animal rights are rights given to animals that allow them to live a life without ill-treatment and corporate exploitation. PETA founder Ingrid Newkirk has said, “When it comes to pain, love, joy, loneliness, and fear, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy. Each one values his or her life and fights the knife”(). I agree that animals should have compassion shown towards them, as they have a life worth living. At the same time, I don't believe that an animal's…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “An Animal’s Place” Michael Pollan (2002) talks about how he is reading “Animal Liberation” while eating a steak at a restaurant. He then starts to talk about the book and how it talks about giving animals civil rights. He then talks about the people who believe in the civil rights movement for animals and how England has changed their Constitution in order to protect animals. The European and Swiss are trying to also protect the rights of animals. Pollan talks about America still seeing animals as “things” (p.399) but we are changing some of our animal slaughter habits.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter Singer's Argument

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You've looked at a few things that present Peter Singer's argument against the way we use animals for food and other products. Pretend that you're talking to a friend and they ask you why Singer thinks it's wrong to eat a cheeseburger. Explain his argument (or what you take to be the core of his argument).…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They Say I Say Ch5, 1

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gershoff is mistaken because he overlooks animals rights, although most animals do not have rights, they sure deserve it. Now a day’s only cats and dogs can go as far as legal protection.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tom Regan's Position

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An Argumentative essay that looks at and breaks down the philosophical difference between Tom Regan’s position on Animal rights and, Peter Singer’s position on Animal liberation as a basis for better treatment of animals.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil. outline

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    B. Singer then turns to the substantive issue of “what are the implications of utilitarianism for our treatment of animals?”…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Australian philosopher Peter Singer, who later this month begins teaching at Princeton University, is perhaps the world's most controversial ethicist. Many readers of his book "Animal Liberation" were moved to embrace vegetarianism, while others recoiled at Singer's attempt to place humans and animals on an even moral plane. Similarly, his argument that severely disabled infants should, in some cases, receive euthanasia has been praised as courageous by some — and denounced by others, including anti-abortion activists, who have protested Singer's Princeton appointment.…

    • 3113 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter Singer and his philosophy have received a range of praise and criticism for his progressive views. Some have called him the most dangerous man in the world, while others consider him a hero in the teachings of morality and ethics. His detractors make mention of his views on Animal Equality, blasting his comparisons of modern man’s treatment of animals to that of; slavery the Holocaust, human suffering and infanticide. Singer’s essay, All Animals Are Equal, poses the argument that all sentiment beings are entitled to the most basic of dignities and consideration, no different than those considerations reserved for humans. Singer draws no line of distinction between our species and other species who we, as humans…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    week 2 DQ 1&2

    • 663 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Singer argues that there is no moral justification for denying moral consideration to animals. Can you think of a reason why our moral consideration should include all humans regardless of their level of cognitive ability, yet denied to non-human animals simply because they have lower levels of cognitive abilities (though still higher in some cases than those of human infants and some mentally disabled humans)? What response might he have to your way of drawing the line between the types of beings that should get moral consideration and those that should not?…

    • 663 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "The Case for Animal Rights," Tom Regan writes about his beliefs regarding animal rights. Regan states the animal rights movement is committed to a number of goals, including: "the total abolition of the use of animals in science; the total dissolution of commercial animal agriculture; and the total elimination of commercial and sport hunting and trapping. Regan goes on and tells us the "fundamental wrong is the system that allows us to view animals as our resources, here for us--to be eaten, or surgically manipulated, or exploited for sport or money." Once people accept this view of animals being here for our resources, they believe what harms the animal doesn't really matter. Regan explains that in order to have this changed, people must change their beliefs. If enough people, especially people that hold a public office, change their beliefs, there can be laws made to protect the rights of animals.…

    • 684 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singers All Animals Are Equal, he claims we should give the same respect the lives of non human animals as we give the lives of humans and that all animals human and non-human are in fact equal. I agree with him because there is no reason as to why animals should not get the same rights and respect as us. Animals have interest, when these are similar to ours, or their pain is on a similar level why give them less consideration. All human and animals have similar feelings such as loving something or feeling pain when they get hurt. I agree with Singer in what he says when animals should be given the same respect and treated equally.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If humans have been given rights of their own, animals should have rights, too. Animals don’t deserve to be experimented on. They feel pain just as humans. We shouldn’t take animals for granted. They have a huge part in our world’s natural cycle. In Lisa Kemmerer’s article titled “Animal Rights” she asserts the issue of what defines animal rights. She addresses the fact that animals need rights just as humans. Ms. Kemmerer subtopics consist of the challenges that follow animal rights, the importance of animal rights, and the reasons why we need to consider standing up for animal rights. As Lisa Kemmerer states, “Animal rights is a simple idea because, at the most basic level, it means only that animal share a right to be treated with respect. It is a profound idea because its implications are far-reaching” (275). It is very important to acknowledge that animals need to be treated with respect. Animals are unable to voice their own rights. It is our duty to use our own rights to advocate the rights of animals. Without advocates for the rights of animals, our economic system may drop from unlawful standards. As a second writer suggests that as human we have moral obligations to not judge one by their outward appearance, skin colour, and ethical background yet we seem to judge animals without considering their feelings (274). We have such an impact on animals that we must stand up for animals and protect them. If we don’t take a…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Rights Definition

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Proponents of animal welfare seek to alleviate the suffering of animals while they are being exploited -- without attempting to question the fundamental basis of whether it is acceptable to exploit animals in the first place. Animal rights beliefs reject the idea that animals need to have a value to the human species in order to be deserving of rights. A person can work for both animal welfare and animal rights.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Singer's Utilitarianism does give some sense of moral equality between humans and animals. He felt that animals have identical interests that are equally morally important as humans and that they must be treated with equal concern. Singer says: "Speciesism. . . the belief that we are entitled to treat members of other species in a way in which it would be wrong to treat members of our own…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays