Preview

Peter Singer: Why The Formula Is Simple?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
377 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Peter Singer: Why The Formula Is Simple?
Peter Singer, believes that people who are wealthy, and live a luxurious lifestyle should donate their money to overseas aid organizations, and although Singer believes “the formula is simple”, I disagree. When Singer states that giving away money is an easy thing task, I believe that even for the prosperous it is not. Not for the fact that they don't have the money, but for the fact that the need for food and medicine is far too great, and dispersed around the world that not everyone would receive this aid.
Singer gives two examples in which one can donate to, and that is UNICEF and Oxfam America, but what about the other significant amount of organizations around the world. Fact is you don't even need to go overseas to see the Poverty, when

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I agree with the comment that Peter Singer’s argument that individuals should donate to alleviate poverty and save lives does not address the underlying structural socioeconomic causes of poverty. His argument for a redistribution of wealth on an individual basis still operates under an economic system where there is an unequal distribution of wealth. As a result, even if individuals donate money, poorer countries will always be reliant on these wealthier countries and individuals for survival resulting in an increased power imbalance. However, I also think that it is important not to disregard these contributions to people in poverty simply because they do not fix the system, as these contributions do have the power to save and improve lives…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer is correct in stating that people should donate extra money to charities. He is off, however, on how much money that should be. He says that an American household with a $50,000 income spends only $30,000 annually on necessities. He does not, however,…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought that you are happier than many children in the world? On the other hand, they do not have enough good conditions to live and develop themselves, including poverty. How will they struggle for their lives with their small hands? They probably need our help to rescue them out of danger. “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, which is written by Peter Singer, is a solution to save children's lives. Singer persuades the reader to participate in helping children who lack food, get many diseases, and do not have good living conditions. His argument is that all of us should contribute to saving the children’s lives According to “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, this solution totally has the ability to be done by our help; however, I am not completely persuaded that I will help children by following Single’s solution.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer calculates that “$200 in donations would help a sickly 2-year-old transform into a healthy 6-year-old” (Singer 2). No one would say that spending money to help a child in need is wasteful; however, preserving the child’s life would not save it from poverty. The child would be alive, but it would still grow up poor and uneducated, and, in all likelihood, its children would be the same. Singer’s solution for poverty is, in all actuality, not a solution at all. His ideas would be great for lowering the fatality rate due to malnourishment or diseases, but he gives no solution to adequately deliver the world from poverty. Donating to children-saving charities, while honorable, does not do much in fixing the problem at hand, worldwide…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, Singer claims that the rich taste of people with money is starving children around the world. He also believes that if human beings have it to give, why don’t we give more to the people who have less. So, according to Singer, a possible solution to world poverty is for Americans to donate all extra income, which is not necessary for everyday living, to organizations that provide aid to other poor areas of the world. If more people donated their excess money to charitable agencies, that money could mean the difference between life and death for children in need, according to Singer.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also advocates that these countries and other like them, who spend even more money on items like Britain’s supersonic transport or Australia’s opera house could and should contribute even more for worthy causes like poverty, better housing, and medical care. Singer declares that affluence people and countries should and can do more than what they do now. Later in the article, Singer states that everyone should give the poor. He supports his reasoning with several arguments.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer points out a large problem in overseas poverty and had many good data points to support this, but offers unreasonable solutions to fix it. Using pathos, he appeals to moral values and makes the reader feel like they are responsible and need to do something about this problem. He offers the solution of giving all excess money not used for necessities to overseas charities, which disinterests the reader and makes Singer a non-credible…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the article "The Singer Solution to World Poverty" Peter Singer talks about whether we should save poor children or not by donating money. In his article, Singer helps us realize our response for the deaths of children in poor families by asking the reader to consider hypothetical situations and put these moral issues into real life. In the long run, simply donating money to poor countries do not solve the problem. In my opinion, we should help the poor children to make their own living, by spending…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peopl Singer Analysis

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even if the money they give to infrastructure or food for them, it still is help and as long as it does not go back into their pockets. Many may say that this isn’t an issue that they think of on a daily basis and that if they saw it in front of them then they would do something about. However, they do see it. We see it when we go out in public, the homeless who ask for money. A meal that we eat could last them days of meals to the homeless who don’t have any food at all. It is an obligation to do so, as you would be extremely appreciative of someone who did it for you. Singer says we also shouldn’t do it because we feel like we have to, instead because it comes out of our hearts. Imagine if everyone in the entire world contributed to someone’s well being? Things like world hunger wouldn’t even occur. Also, it’s not like people aren’t aware, they just choose to not take the blindfold off as they think “it’s not my problem”. Another example would be walking passed a drowning child and you ignore it, this is morally…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singer's "The Singer Solution to World Poverty" Singer is describing to us in his story that everyone should give up their money to save a child's life. In that statement, its not completely fair that we have to give away our hard earned money to help out kids. Think of it as this, lets say he put one in this type of situation, what would one think about it? Yes, it does make sense that one should help out and lend some money to help the children out, but not all of the money we've worked hard for to get. Finally with all this, one does not agree with Singer's proposal, its not fair that we have to give away our hard earned money to help out kids lives.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Car Act

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Singer also had counter arguments that he presented in his article. He claims that if everyone donated just a little, what they should, then everyone would only need to donate a small amount. Therefore, there would be no reason for one to donate more than another. So, Singer responds stating that it is not true that everyone donates what they should so this would be irrelevant. Another counter argument is since there aren 't many people donating and those who do donate, should just keep giving until they are almost as poor as those they are helping. Well. this just does not seem fair! And it 's not becuase this would result in them donating too much. Singer also points out that this would only happen if they did not know what others were donating but they may act as if they are all donating the same. Singer also says that we…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critical Response

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Everyday millions of children around the world fight for survival due to starvation, lack of shelter, and proper healthcare. World poverty increases significantly daily, and innocent children lives are being affected and destroyed. The fact that the child cannot address their world poverty issue hands on, should encourage people to give back to communities that are less fortunate. In “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” Peter Singers argues, that people main priorities are luxury items instead of supporting charitable agencies that are fighting against world poverty. Many individuals follow the saying “Keeping up with the Joneses” . Which means they try to live a lavish lifestyle, but really forget about the bigger picture, and that’s helping children who struggles to get a meal daily. Singer is right we should help support charitable agencies, but in order for that to happen people should be more open-minded about donating, and put away their fancy lifestyle and luxury items.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Giving your money to the poor or to charity organizations may sound easy enough, but in practice it is basically impossible. Peter Singer, in his recent NY Times article, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” argues that the rich should donate whatever luxuries and whatever money they don’t’ need all to the less prosperous. Many would argue both for and against such a viewpoint, and such a “solution” would require evaluation of its pros and cons before application.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays