Peter Singer: All Animals Are Equal

Good Essays
Writing Assignment 1
Singer: All Animals Are Equal

Peter Singer, a Utilitarian, believes in the maximization of happiness of humans and extends this thought to the nonhuman inhabitants of Earth. Singer, believes that all animals should be granted moral status, similar to that of the human inhabitants. He presents his argument in a modus ponens form. His conclusion of, that nonhuman entities should be given the same amount of moral consideration as human entities is reached though his presentation of premises that if an entity can suffer, then its suffering must be given similar moral consideration to that of human entities. In Singer’s second premise he states that that nonhuman entities have the capability of suffering, therefore making his argument strong and valid. The first premise presents the idea of the “principle of equal consideration” which says that if a nonhuman entity has the ability to suffer, then it should be given equal moral consideration as humans. This premise means that if an nonhuman is suffering, we should take it into consideration and try to minimize the pain. According to Singer, suffering is a prerequisite to interests of taking their suffering into moral consideration, and if you have sentience, this should give you moral status similar to humans. People who object this thought would say something to the likes of “humans are the intellectually superior beings and have a right to utilize their surroundings (plants, animals, etc) to maximize their survival, mainly their happiness.” To this Singer would counter that intelligence is an arbitrary rebuttal. The argument to Singer is pointless because if you consider a certain level intelligence is the cut off for being granted the “principle of equal consideration” then you would have to exclude certain humans since some mentally challenged and young children do not possess the same mental capabilities as even some Apes and other mammals. This would allow, in theory, factories to test

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The lingering presence of guilt when most folks are presented with a dish that has formed from the basis of an animal seems to have only increased with the mounting knowledge of how a large number of animals are treated, whether it is for product testing or for human consumption. The expectation that animals, especially those raised in a slaughterhouses, live a tranquil, cruelty-free life would seem a bit far fetched to me, yet it is difficult to deny that the deplorable conditions shown in exploitation…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Equal Right for Animals? PHI: 103 Informal Logic Instructor: Courtney Barclay Evan J. McDaniel April 20, 2015 Since the first edition of Peter Singer’s book “Animal Liberation” in 1975 the animal rights movement has been a topic of discussion. This movement or the animal liberation movement is an effort designed to protect mammals from being mistreated and regarded as property by humans. Peter Singer is known as a Utilitarian and believes in maximizing individual happiness while minimizing…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “All Animals are Equal*” Peter Singer argues that by eating animals and performing experiments on them we are violating their basic principles of equality and the equality of consideration. In the article Singer goes on to say how animals should have the same rights as humans because by not doing so we are practicing speciesism, and most humans do. When we practice speciesism we are more interested in the members of our own species over those of other species. Singer supports his claims by using…

    • 272 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singers All Animals Are Equal, he claims we should give the same respect the lives of non human animals as we give the lives of humans and that all animals human and non-human are in fact equal. I agree with him because there is no reason as to why animals should not get the same rights and respect as us. Animals have interest, when these are similar to ours, or their pain is on a similar level why give them less consideration. All human and animals have similar feelings such as loving something…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All Animals Are Equal

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages

    occur each day on the issues of animal cruelty and human rights, but when the issues are put together which will reign over the other? The author Peter Singer of “All Animals are Equal” and “Tools for Research” presents his argument for determining when animal experiments are justified. The author starts his paper with a counter argument, questioning if one would be willing to let thousands of people die if those people could be saved by experimentation on a single animal. The answer is a unanimous no;…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many decades ago, animal rights was seen as nonexistent to humans. Animals were not considered as important creatures as humans, as their existence was solely recognized for human use only. Unfortunately, the actions of humans have led to immoral behavior and mistreatment towards animals, which have resulted to neglect, starvation, physical abuse, and participation of animal fights for money, just to name a few. With help of the formation of Animal Rights group such as PETA, created a form of social…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "All Animals Are Equal"

    • 981 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In order to understand Peter Singer's article "All Animals Are Equal", one has to look at his viewpoint and perspective. Singer is a utilitarian, which is someone who believes that best outcome is something that causes that greatest amount of pleasure (or the least amount of pain) for the greatest number of people. However, in this definition the word 'people' is used, as to mean only humans. This is the point that Singer is trying to argue. Who is to say that animals don't feel pain or experience…

    • 981 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Liberation In “Animal Liberation” Singer compares the past acts of liberation to animal liberation and how they are not equal. Peter Singer compares women’s rights and black rights to animal rights. Some in which most people think have no comparison at all. Singer expresses how people may not think highly of animal rights because they are not humans. Singer expressed how other sociologist and psychologist view this to be the same way. I mean why not? We test most human things on animals.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Singer’s Argument for Animal Equality This paper is the result of feeling that Singer’s argument for animal equality in his paper ‘All Animals are Equal’ deserves to be taken more seriously than it often is. What I try to do is identify Singer’s essential argument and then defend it against some objections I have come across. The ‘irrelevance argument’ Singer begins by assuming that the ‘principle of equality’ or ‘principle of equal consideration of interests’ is a basic moral principle…

    • 5602 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter Singer

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Page

    Peter Singer has influentially argued that animals’ interests must be given equal consideration to comparable human interests-so that, for example, a human’s and an animal’s interest in avoiding suffering should be considered equally morally important (Degrazia, Mappes, & Brand-Ballard, 2011, pg. 251). Animals have their own way of life and are not exactly made like humans. How are we able to trust research that works on animals but may not work on humans? Because our species are very different,…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays