International Journal of Business and Management; Vol. 7, No. 24; 2012 ISSN 1833-3850
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education
Developing a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for PESTEL Analysis
Department of Business Management , Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey
Correspondence: İhsan Yüksel, Department of Business Management, Kırıkkale University, 7140 Kırıkkale, Turkey. Tel: 90-318-3573860. E-mail: email@example.com
Received: August 26, 2012
Accepted: October 12, 2012
Online Published: November 21, 2012
Although the conceptual structure and nature of PESTEL (Political, Economic, Socio-cultural, Technological, Environment and Legal) analysis requires an integrated approach to analysis, the technical framework of PESTEL does not adequately support such an approach. PESTEL analysis, as it stands, mainly provides a general idea about the macro environmental conditions and situation of a company. This study presents a model to address problems encountered in the measurement and evaluation process of PESTEL analysis. The integrated structure of PESTEL factors and sub-factors were modeled by AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and ANP (Analytic Network Process) techniques. Relationships between PESTEL factors were determined by DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory). Global weights of the sub-factors were calculated using ANP. The PESTEL analysis model proposed in the study could determine the extent to which the macro environment of a company provides suitable conditions to achieve the aims of the company. Keywords: strategic management; macro environmental analysis, PESTEL analysis, ANP, DEMATEL 1. Introduction
Globalization and technological advancements have increased the potential for interaction among people living in different geographic locations. Within this process of change, national boundaries lose their relative importance in terms of everyday economic activities. Today, the importance and value of goods and services produced outside national political geographies have increased. As a result, the concept of international competition has become increasingly important (Eren, 2002). This process of change rapidly differentiates the structure of the continually broadening and changing environment in which companies conduct their activities. A macro environmental factor that was historically less important to achieving the goals of a company might therefore become increasingly important today. For example, new phenomena and concepts such as environmental protection, environmental health, transparency, and accountability have become important parameters that need to be taken into account in commercial activities. In its broadest sense, change affects the structure, decision-making, business methods, and actions of companies. Today, it is not possible for a company to survive in the long term without considering this dynamic process. A company has no chance to make a mistake and also to carry out activities by chance in an expanding and highly unstable environment. As a result, while carrying out its operations, a company must increasingly take into account the environment within which it operate. To meet such needs, company decision-makers should adopt a strategic approach to the management of macro environmental events, occurrences, and operations.
Strategic analysis, is the first of the basic stages of strategic management, and involves the analysis of current factors relevant to the environmental within which the company carries out its operations (Ülgen & Mirze, 2007). In general terms, the concept of environment involves far, near and internal environments, including all types of factors related to the activities of the company. In terms of the company, this comprises both internal and external environments. The internal environment...
References: Bayazit, O., & Karpak, B. (2007). An analytical network process-based framework for successful total quality
management (TQM): An assessment of Turkish manufacturing industry readiness
Dinçer, Ö. (2004). Stratejik yönetim ve işletme politikası. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
Eren, E. (2002). Stratejik yönetim ve işletme politikası. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
Katko, T. S. (2006). Road Safety Fatalities, Management, and Policy in Finland, 1970-2003. Public Works
Management & Policy, 11(2), 126-138
Lee, J. W., & Kim, S. H. (2000). Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent
information system project selection
Mayaka, M. A., & Prasad, H. (2012). Tourism in Kenya: An analysis of strategic issues and challenges. Tourism
Management Perspectives, 1, 48-56
Meade, L. M., & Sarkis, J. (1998). Strategic analysis of logistic and supply chain management systems using the
analytical network process
Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh:
Saaty, T. L., & Takizawa, M. (1986). Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear
retrofit for existing residential buildings in China’s northern heating region. Energy Policy, 37, 2098-2101.
hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst. Appl. 32, 1028-1044.
Vitkiene, E. (2009). Questions that have to be answered by a well managed strategy of coastal recreation and
tourism enterprises development
Wu, W. W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL
Wu, W. W., & Lee, Y. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method.
Yüksel, İ., & Dağdeviren, M. (2007). Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis – A case
study for a textile firm
Yüksel, İ., & Dağdeviren, M. (2010). Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard
(BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm
Please join StudyMode to read the full document