By only limiting the size of the drink, there are many loopholes which would give …show more content…
Yes, the restricted sizing would be a small step to the diminishment of obesity, but many more changes would need to be enforced to have a large effect on the population. For example, sugar in foods and drinks is not solely responsible for the obesity epidemic in America. Obesity can be caused by a combination of lack of exercise, unhealthy eating, genetics, and environment. In lower class areas unhealthy food and drink options are preferable because they usually cost much less than other more nutritious ones. For instance, at McDonald's cheeseburgers or french fries can be bought for a dollar, but a salad would cost the customer close to five dollars. Joy Dubost, a nutritionist who works for the National Restaurant Association revealed another flaw, the belief that by eliminating large portions will have a large effect, by stating, “It’s not reasonable to blame or cite one product. [The proposal] produces a false sense of accomplishment in the fight against obesity.”(Gross). This demonstrates that even trained professionals understand the flaws in a potential