Preview

Persuasive Essay On Stop And Frisk

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
649 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasive Essay On Stop And Frisk
Thomas Jefferson once said, “A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both, and deserve neither.” Some communities constantly face complications such as being illegally searched by the police. As citizens, the fourth Amendment gives us the right as people to be secure in our persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable search. But it seems as if the Fourth Amendment has lost its authority when it comes to Stop and Frisk programs. People think that it prevents crimes, but these searches are often unsuccessful at catching criminals. It’s a violation of rights and I believe that no police department should be able to do it. The police are supposed to serve and protect us. Instead, people no longer feel safe around police. In fact many have come to fear them. The idea of Stop and Frisk has created many problems in today’s society. There are debates over NYC about the policy of stop and frisk. Some people think it’s good for us, but there are others who don’t really appreciate it. People who are against it think that the police are invading their personal space, and even …show more content…
They believe that Stop and Frisk policy keeps communities safe and prevents crimes from taking place. But these searches done by police are not just unconstitutional, it is an invasion of privacy. This program is obviously not preventing crimes from happening. Statistics show that this program is ineffective. Based on data provided by NYPD, 179,063 were stopped and searched by police in 2013. Out of those people, 89% were completely innocent. Which means that they have found something on only 11% of the people. More than half of the time, there is no probable cause for them to stop and search these people, but they do it anyway. This just proves that theses searches do not effectively find criminals and instead violates the rights of innocent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Today around 1,400 citizens in New York City will have their constitutional rights violated through an unlawful search. The legal term for the controversial search is stop and frisk. The New York Police Department continues to pressure its officers to stop and frisk citizens, and these situations are happening at an alarmingly increasing rate. For the New York Police Department, it seems to be a game of numbers as they continue to force their officers to conduct stop and frisks through quotas (Gangi). While New York City has seen a decrease in crime over Mayor Bloomberg's term, it is difficult to directly correlate the stop and frisk policy with these decreases. This unlawful practice needs to stop as it is a controversial practice that many people believe is a direct violation of the human rights inherent for citizens. Furthermore, it could turn New York City into a police state.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop and frisk is a controversial topic which has many retractors as supporters. On internet the information about this topic is really broad. However, in this response I did a research based on pros of the stop and frisk program. I took information from newspapers, TV channels, blogs, forums, research of universities. Moreover, I looked for other topics related such as; increase of violence, illegal guns, gun violence, weapons in schools, and also, gangs in NYC.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop Frisk

    • 1682 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the city where crime was at all time high during the nineties, the top politicians in New York City decided that something should be done to help stop crime. The NYPD implemented the “Stop and Frisk” policy to bring the crime rate down in the city. However it did more than exceed its expectations and it has been more of a negative than a positive. This policy created tension between the NYPD and the law abiding citizens of New York City because thousands stopped were people of the Black and Latino communities. According to the US Census Bureau NYC has a population of 8,336,697 people. Blacks and Latinos make up 53% of the city population. 85% of New Yorkers stopped are Black and Latino men and 6% of that number actually led to an arrest (NYCLU). At this shocking percentage, it’s apparent that this policy is discriminatory against Blacks and Latinos. Not only is this policy discriminatory, it has violated citizens constitutional rights and been deemed racial profiling.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop and Frisk

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 2011 alone, 700,000 New Yorkers were pulled over for stop and frisk searches. Approximately 87 percent were Hispanic or Black and of that percentage 90 percent were deemed innocent (Huffington Post). In comparison, from 2002 to 2011 Hispanics and Blacks made up 90 percent of people stopped, and 88 percent of those stopped were innocent New Yorker (New York Civil Liberties Union). If racial profiling in this case was effective that would be one thing, but there has yet to be any published research that has proven the effectiveness of this program, which is shown in the lack of arrests produced. Violent crimes in New York have decreased by 29 percent between 2001 and 2010; however, other major cities, such as Los Angeles and New Orleans, have experience larger declines without the use of stop and frisk (New York Civil Liberties Union). This is a clear example of why this program that causes more harm than good, should be abolished.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop and Frisk

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures. Modern officials have granted police officers in New York City an incentive to respect the amendment. The Stop and Frisk program employed by the New York Police Department, gives police officers the right to initiate a stop of an individual on the street allegedly and do a quick search of their outer clothes for weapons based on if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has or is about to take place and the person stopped is armed or dangerous. This reasonable suspicion is not based with specific facts but from the hunches from New York Police officers.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stop and Frisk for Law

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The New York City Police Department (NYPD) is charged with keeping the public safe by responding to more than 100,000 emergency service (911) calls per year. In addition to responding to 911 calls, the NYPD also conduct patrols by foot and car to ensure the public’s safety. Keeping New York City (NYC) safe is a vital mission of the NYPD. Most residents that reside in NYC appreciate the efforts of the NYPD in keeping their neighborhoods safe; however in conjunction with safety the residents of NYC should trust the police that patrol their neighborhoods. This trust is called into question regarding the highly debated stop and frisk program conducted by the NYPD. Throughout the years there has been expressions of contentment and uneasiness regarding the stop and frisk program. NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg along with the NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly—and some residents of NYC—fully support the stop and frisk program and agree that it is an effective crime fighting tool and deterrent, while many…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop and Frisk

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Supreme Court rejected the defendants' arguments. The Court noted that stops and frisks are considerably less intrusive than full-blown arrests and searches. It also observed that the interests in crime prevention and in police safety require that the police have some leeway to act before full probable cause has developed. The Fourth Amendment's reasonableness requirement is sufficiently flexible to permit an officer to investigate the situation. The "sole justification" for a frisk, said the Court, is the "protection of the police officer and others nearby." Because of this narrow scope, a frisk must be "reasonably designed to discover guns,…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    stop and frisk

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Under the U.S constitution, the 4th amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures such as “Stop and Frisk”. The “Stop and Frisk” law allows police officers to stop someone if they have reasonable evidence, but tribunes are abusing that power by stopping individuals based off seeing furtive movements and not on actual evidence which is unconstitutional. In his article “Why Stop and Frisk Matters, Even if You Don’t Live in New York” Andrew Cohen States “One example of poor training is particularly telling. Two officers testified to their understanding of the term ‘furtive movements’. One explained that ‘furtive movements’ is a very broad concept, and could include a person ‘changing direction’…”. This is a shoddy reason to stop an individual based off furtive movements because it is important for police to muster evidence that proves an individual is guilty. In her article “Growing up with Stop and Frisk” Sara Maria Glanowski states “Earlier this week, a federal judge ruled…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most Americans today don’t know what rights we are given. The Bill of Rights were put in place to give US citizens protection from corrupt police and government officials. A common Amendment that most Americans don’t realize we have is the Fourth amendment. The Fourth Amendment gives us protection against arbitrary searches and seizures without a proper warrant. It was first used to prevent the use of writs of assistance which is blanket search warrants with which the british custom officials had invaded homes to search for smuggled goods. As the fourth amendment has changed and evolved in its meaning over time, many Supreme Court cases have presented themselves to the states.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rights you are read while being placed under arrest are the Miranda rights. They state that what you say will be used against you in court and that you have the right to an attorney. These rights are read to protect your freedom and to inform you of your constitutional rights. It became procedure to state the rights after the Miranda vs. Arizona case. Ernesto Miranda was sentenced to 20-30 years in prison for counts of kidnapping and rape. In court, Miranda argued that he did not know his rights and that they should have been told to him. He is the reason that criminal suspects receive more justice from police officers.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is a country where many unarmed civilians have suffered injuries or been killed at the hands of police officers. Drastic changes are needed to solve the issue of police brutality. Such excessive force by police officers is very disturbing to the community. People around the country are fighting for a country where law enforcement treats all communities with dignity, employs restraint on the power police officers, and only use the necessary force to maintain the community’s safety. Over the years there have many cases involving police brutality such as the cases of Rodney King, Timothy Thomas, and Eric Garner. Many people feel that nothing has changed with the issue of police brutality since juries still acquitted police officers, cops get their jobs back, and brutality happens again. But change has occurred and some things have become better as a result of it being publicized and causing public outrage.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Racial profiling has been and will continue to be a problem in the United States. Many believe that racial profiling is more prevalent in today’s society; however, this issue has been a part of our society since slavery. Moreover, African American males are mostly the targets of racial profiling, especially in larger cities like New York City and Los Angeles. Racial profiling is becoming a huge problem within the police departments. Police officers are conducting more traffic stops on African Americans males than on any other racial group, for the reason that many police officers believe African Americans males are most likely to be engaged in some sort of criminal activity. Thus, racial profiling is illegal in the United States, and a police officer have the right to stop a motorist and search his or her vehicle, if he or she feels the person is withholding illegal weapons and/or drugs. However, many argue that most traffic stops that lead to an arrest were against African American males, sparking up controversial issues against racial profiling and police officers in recent years (Weitzer, Tuch, 2002).…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having people live in fear of the police because they might get searched for no reason is not living freely. Then of course there’s the fear that would come along with not needing a warrant. People would be afraid to walk by policemen/policewoman because they might get searched. A policemen could basically walk up to a random citizen and say “I’m going to search you.” and the person would have to get searched without their consent. It’s definitely a good thing that we have the fourth amendment, but there are some modifications that can be made to it to make it more reliable. Being able to search a person because they blatantly have drugs is on modification that should be added. If the policeman finds something, then they did their job. If they don’t they could be punished for falsely accusing the suspect. However, this is only the idea of a thirteen-year-old boy. The fourth amendment does keep people from fearing the police around them now though. Maybe I’m just weird for having negative feelings towards the fourth amendment, but I just have a different way of thinking about…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    stop and frisk

    • 1498 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stop and frisk was adopted from the English command law by many American courts. In accordance with English common law, without statutory provisions, a police officer has the power to stop, question, and frisk suspects given reasonable circumstances. Based on a standard, which holds less than probable cause, this power is granted upon the standard of reasonable suspicion. The whole theory behind stop and frisk in urban communities is the broken window theory which is if there are houses in the area that are abandon it can lead to young adults getting into mistress in order to avoid that police officer would stop and question these peoples were about. Over the years till present time stop and frisk has been…

    • 1498 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays