Someone argued that though using bridge texts is good, we may be using it simply as a way to make our “cannon lit” more palatable rather than truly support it. Something that I brought up during the discussion was how I find most of the value in that sort of traditional lit in the way that it is referenced in current culture. Though the text itself is important, I think what matters more for the students are the things in the real world that are references to the text and ideas/words that originated within them. As a teacher and through my observations this semester I think that the key to engaging students in reading literature written almost a hundred years ago is to find connections to their life and let them explore those connections. I do understand some of what the other people said about how teachers could teach those things without the text, but I think that there is a innate value in texts that keep being passed down to the next …show more content…
They talked about how using a difficult text like Shakespeare in your classroom can make things even more difficult for a non-native speaker. If someone who speaks the language has trouble understanding the references and getting the meaning, someone who does not has almost no chance and will likely give up. They suggested always using pictures when describing something to a non-native speaker. I found their insights really helpful when thinking about how I am going to help the ELL students in my own classroom. Austin also had a cool perspective about how focusing on the historical significance of something that you give to the students will help give it more meaning for them, especially considering his students who will be primarily speaking another