Preview

Perkin Warbeck

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2487 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Perkin Warbeck
What were the Cause and Consequences of Perkin Warbeck in 1489-99 in the reign of Henry VII and to what extent did it pose a problem or threat to the Crown.
Perkin Warbeck was extremely interesting character, who’s period of as a pretender is looked at with much diversity. In a sense to understand him we have to look at many different areas and the different sections of his activities to see if he can be labelled a true threat. We are going to look at the true effect of Warbeck to the Tudor dynasty and analyse his different actions to see the consequences of him, and how he emerged in the first place.
First we are going to look at how Warbeck managed to rise in the first place. As the story goes, he was working for a cloth merchant from Flanders and arrived in Cork where he was showing off the goods. When people saw how finely dressed he was, they immediately took upon him and told him that he was the ‘Earl of Warwick’, who was Edward IV’s great nephew. However knowing that this threat could easily be tackled by Henry VII who had the actual Earl of Warwick in the tower of London, he quickly changed his identity to Richard, Duke of York. This is where it becomes a threat to Henry, with a very weak claim to the throne himself, a Duke of York imposter would be highly difficult to disprove as the priest who had buried the bodies of the children was dead so could not justify their identity. In reality, the plot had probably been pre planned by Margaret of Burgundy, who looked to avenge Richard III, her brother.
With it being established that Warbeck had a secure (In the minds of many people at the time anyway) claim to the throne, he could begin his conquests in attempt to take England from the Tudors. We must now look at the ever important aspect of his supporters. For any true Pretender, they must have a secure backing from other Kings if they wished to fund and organise any true rebellion. He initially had several different countries looking to support him.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However in source 6, it should be remembered that Henry is giving Wolsey an instruction which although giving him freedom too, shows that Henry was in overall control. Also, the report from Cavendish in source 4, is possibly un-reliable as there is a link that Cavendish, being Wolsey’s “friend and servant,” may be biased towards his master. This may lead him to possibly exaggerate the powers actually bestowed by Wolsey. Additionally, source 4 offers no indication of the year that this occurred in, as it is possible that Wolsey’s power worked throughout the ten year period depending on certain events. For example, throughout the French Invasion of 1512 and 1513, when Henry led on occasion 30,000 soldiers into France, it is clear that Henry was in control.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sources L and N agree that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-25 although as source L is a painting it has a motive and probably a bias one whilst source M disagrees with the statement by highlighting ‘troubles associated from the Amicable Grant’.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legitimacy is the key to a successful kingship. If you can be perceived as an effective and legitimate ruler by the nobility, you will remain in power. This was especially important in the early period of the reign of Edward IV because the son of Henry VI, Edward of Westminster, was still alive until he was killed at the Battle of Tewkesbury on 4th May 1471. If Edward IV not establish the legitimacy in the minds of the nobles, then they could easily justify overthrowing the usurper because the son of the rightful king, Edward of Westminster, was still alive. Our extract shows us this attempt to legitimise Edward IV by delegitimising the overthrow of Richard II by saying that Henry IV took the throne through illegal…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 22nd August 1485, King Richard III lost the Battle of Bosworth to Henry Tudor. One of the main reasons for him losing was due to his unpopularity with the people and his nobles. Richard was disliked by many of his nobles because he gave power to nobles from the north, which he knew, annoying the nobility in the south of England. This meant that in the battle he had little support, and some of his nobles, such as the Stanley’s fought for Henry. Richard was also disliked by the people of England. He seized the crown in 1483, and rumours spread that he killed his two nephews. This made him disliked, and few people supported him.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry’s first real aspirations of reclaiming the throne of England ostensibly came about in 1483 following the quashed Buckingham rebellion. This uprising showed Henry the lack of support for Richard and between 1483 and 1485, Henry sent emissaries to build support for himself in England, before being forced to flee from…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry VIII chief minister from his rise to power in 1514 after working himself up until his eventual fall from the king’s favour in 1529. During the time period where Wolsey contained his power he made many changes to England’s domestic policies. For this reason I do not accept the view of source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were completely disappointing.…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry the Young, crowned by his father in 1172 as co-regent of the Kingdom of England and the duchy of Normandy, led one of the main rebellion that Henry II affronted during is reign. During two years, 1173-74, Henry the Young moved war against his father with the support…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    under-mighty king Henry who did not make the right decision between York and Somerset. The king is…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All three sources only partly agree that Woley’s rise to power was a result of luck. Source C seems to suggest that the rise of power was due to luck, within the source it tells us that one of Wolsey’s main critics, Surrey, was too old to argue against him and his son too young to do so also. Warham has retired and therefore a position of power has opened up because of this Wolsey can now manoeuver his friends into other positions of power to help him, therefore this would suggest that Wolsey at this time had a lot of fortune on his side. Although within all these sources, luck may not remain the main theme it reoccurs throughout each, whether small or large. Source D reflects that’s Wolsey had a fortunate place with the King as Henry was easily bribed with gifts ‘beautifully fashioned dish, a jewel, or gifts of that sort’. Wolsey’s had his very own biographer which was his first servant and hence this creates a bias account as the information Cavendish will be collecting will be from Wolsey and this could be twisted into unreliable information, although most points also have element of Wolsey’s skilfulness it could be argued that King Henry simply favoured Wolsey, or that it was Wolsey’s personality rather than his skill that made the king acceptant of him.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry the VIII wanted to end his marriage to Catherine of Aragon in 1527 with using an annulment, this was then Wolsey’s job to provide what the king wanted. Due to Wolsey’s constant victories, he was able to sustain power for 15 years, outlasting the King‘s other advisers. Yet his fall was swift and dramatic, which came after his failure of obtaining Henry’s divorce from Catherine of Aragon. In regards to this, it seems clear that this is the reason why Wolsey fell from power, yet there are possible contributing factors that must take into consideration. For instance Wolsey’s failure sometimes was out of his control as Queen Catherine was Charles V’s aunt so he would never accept the annulment in fear of hear being humiliated. Charles also had captured Pope Clement this meant that all decisions would have been controlled and manipulated to Charles’ will, delaying the annulment even more. Another failure that was out of Wolsey’s control was the role of factions within the court, Anne Boleyn and her family…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolsey had always caused resentment from the nobility, and this only grew as he became more dominant in Henry VIII’s government. Not only did nobles dislike him due to his low birth contrasted with his high positions, such as becoming Lord Chancellor in 1515, but resentment was also caused by his lavish lifestyle. Although opposition against him had got stronger throughout his career, this in itself was not significant enough to cause his fall. It was a factor that undoubtedly would’ve swayed Henry, however the ultimate reason for Wolsey’s fall was the failure to annul Henry’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This rebirth came after being embarrassed and humiliated by his marriages to Cleves and Howard. It is also important to recognise as Richardson does, that the reason the peace after 1545 is so uneasy is because of Henry’s achievements in war. No longer was there a balance in honour, therefore Francis was stuck in a peace he wanted to resolve - hence the continued sour relations that weren’t seen after the Field of the Cloth of Gold, which was otherwise similar in circumstances. The reason Henry VIII acted in such a reserved, and what has been interpreted as fearful way in 1539, was because of extent of the threat - the potential for a Catholic Crusade from a Habsburg-Valois alliance had a significant potential, in the wake of the Papal Bull of Excommunication against Henry VIII. Had the Treaty of Toledo been followed through it would have presented an existential crisis to the throne. However other explanations for his alliance seeking have been uncovered by McEntegart. He argues that, whilst security still remained a top priority, the king also had theological reasons for discussing with the Schmalkaldic League, exemplified by his considerations, at least on aspects of the Augsburg confession, in order to assist in creating uniformity in the Church. Furthermore he reveals the great plays of Cromwell’s faction in this period against the conservatives in order to further his heretical cause. This in turn led to Henry more closely seeking relations with the Schmalkalden as well as withdrawing from mainstream European politics. Security was secondary to honour, partially due to honour producing a security in its own right, at least in the eyes of Henry, but crucially due to the great focus that was still placed on the role of a chivalric and Godly…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the sixteenth century, peasants and the poor rose against the German states and their lords. To show their unhappiness, the peasants and poor would perform rebellious actions and created the grievances in word in hope to make a change with their lords' control over them. The probable main cause for the rebellion and uprisings was due to the hatred on the lords oppressions. Responses varied, considering that lords and theologians such as Martin Luther did not agree with the choice of the peasants while some other theologians did agree with the peasants and even urged and praised them to continue.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The rebellion in Late Medieval Europe was caused by numerous individuals, events and developments in the 14th Century. In this essay I will be discussing the significance of each of these factors concerning the English, Czech and German revolts, and the opinions of Cohn, Tuchman and Walsingham.…

    • 4136 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many different opinions regarding whether Wolsey was seen more as a partner to Henry than a servant. Whilst source 7 agrees with this, suggesting that not only did Wolsey have equal power to that of Henry, but he also had the wealth and mannerism of a king too. Source 8 however contradicts this, and suggests that Wolsey was purely a servant to the king. As everything Wolsey did went through Henry first, it is seen here that Wolsey had no power at all, a relied heavily on pleasing the king in order to keep his statutory role as cardinal. This suggests that Wolsey could have been in fact fearful of Henry, showing an entirely more servant relationship and completely contradicting that of source 7. It is important when analysing the sources, establishing the differences between how other people perceived the relationship between Wolsey and the king, and how the king actually perceived it.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays