Preview

Performance Appraisal

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
823 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Performance Appraisal
Performance Appraisal Tools and Techniques inShare
4
Following are the tools used by the organizations for Performance Appraisals of their employees.

Ranking
Paired Comparison
Forced Distribution
Confidential Report
Essay Evaluation
Critical Incident
Checklists
Graphic Rating Scale
BARS
Forced Choice Method
MBO
Field Review Technique
Performance Test
We will be discussing the important performance appraisal tools and techniques in detail.
Ranking Method
The ranking system requires the rater to rank his subordinates on overall performance. This consists in simply putting a man in a rank order. Under this method, the ranking of an employee in a work group is done against that of another employee. The relative position of each employee is tested in terms of his numerical rank. It may also be done by ranking a person on his job performance against another member of the competitive group.

Advantages of Ranking Method
Employees are ranked according to their performance levels.
It is easier to rank the best and the worst employee.
Limitations of Ranking Method
The “whole man” is compared with another “whole man” in this method. In practice, it is very difficult to compare individuals possessing various individual traits.
This method speaks only of the position where an employee stands in his group. It does not test anything about how much better or how much worse an employee is when compared to another employee.
When a large number of employees are working, ranking of individuals become a difficult issue.
There is no systematic procedure for ranking individuals in the organization. The ranking system does not eliminate the possibility of snap judgements.
Forced Distribution method
This is a ranking technique where raters are required to allocate a certain percentage of rates to certain categories (eg: superior, above average, average) or percentiles (eg: top 10 percent, bottom 20 percent etc). Both the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Nt1330 Unit 9 Study Guide
    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nt1330 Unit 9 Study Guide

    * Criterion References testing measures an individual’s performance with respect to an expected criteria or established norm…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hrm 531 Week 1
    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hrm 531 Week 1

    In Learning Team C this week we discussed the differences between the two appraisal systems that we chose, the difficulties in evaluating team performance, the unique needs of a team appraisal system, and how important team motivations and expectations are. Appraisal systems are used to determine how employees at an organization are performing. There are many types of appraisal systems to use in determining employee performance levels. In our discussions we were using the performance appraisal system and the team appraisal system.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Landslide Limousine Performance Management Plan
    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Landslide Limousine Performance Management Plan

    We will develop a skills matrix for each role and hold the employee accountable to those skills. The skills matrix will list all the skills necessary for each role. Those that exceed the skills matrix will be seen as someone who has the skills to train others and will be regarded as a subject matter expert. A manager or supervisor who rank an employee as an exceeds rating will have to validate why they issued this rating and back it up with documentation. This is the highest rating. Those that meet the expectation will be regarded as employees who are where they need to be and could benefit from training for further development. Most of the employees will fall in this category.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Collaboration Assessment 3.04 Geometry
    • 337 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Collaboration Assessment 3.04 Geometry

    2. Peer and self-evaluation: Rate each member of the team, including yourself, according to each of…

    • 337 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Performance Mgmt amba620 week4
    • 1636 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Performance Mgmt amba620 week4

    An organization uses a performance management as a tool to examine and evaluate rather and employee’s work behavior is meeting standards. There are job descriptions set for each position within an organization. To measure an employee’s performance, the organization uses a performance appraisal system. This system determines rather the person being appraised will need additional training or, is not right for the position. This paper will discuss an organizations need, as well as purpose for a performance appraisal system. It will also discuss the requirements necessary to have an effective performance appraisal and some of the possible limitations.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Streeter Et Al. V. Ford Motor Company
    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Streeter Et Al. V. Ford Motor Company

    At many times these structures use percentages to rank those who are more productive at high ranks and those least at low ranks. According to The Union Times, Five percent of the company was evaluated when the system was put into pace in 2000. A, B, or C grades were given to employees. Employees receiving a C could lose bonuses and raises, and two back-to-back C 's would possibly result in termination. Those involved in the class believed that before the grading program, they had received approving evaluations. Because of the new system, those evaluated, got C 's while some women and minorities with less work history or experience received greater ranks…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    20-70-10 vs. a-B-C
    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    20-70-10 vs. a-B-C

    However, like anything else, this framework does not come without pitfalls. By ranking an employee into that bottom 10%, it makes them less visible as they are in the “firing zone.” Who is to say, your HR team didn’t put the employee in the incorrect department? However, now that they are in the 10% zone, it will make the move from department to department even harder because now they are stereotyped as a poor performer. Today, we live in a dog-eat-dog world where you are rarely safe unless you control everything. This framework boosts the…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Info
    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Info

    2. Peer and Self Evaluation: Rate each member of the team, including yourself, on each of the performance criteria below. Use the rating scale of three equals above average, two equals average, and one equals below average.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Davita Dialysis
    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Davita Dialysis

    References: Hazels, B., & Sasse, C.. (2008). Forced Ranking: A Review. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 73(2), 35-39,2. Retrieved September 30, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1503638001).…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Collaboration
    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Collaboration

    Peer and Self-Evaluation: Rate each member of the team, including yourself, according to each of the performance criteria below.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Forced Ranking
    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Forced Ranking

    I would recommend a forced distribution list to organizations that are large in size and are looking to create a process oriented approach. About 20% of Fortune 1,000 companies and growing are using this approach. “Some say forced ranking is not only the best method, but an essential practice to turn a struggling company into a market-dominating one.” (Bates, 2003) This approach is the best way to identify your high performing individuals and also the bottom performs who should be helped out. The high performers should be given promotions, financial incentives and training to grow within the company. A leadership development program can also be started after identifying the high performers. The low performers should be put on a performance improvement plan to get help. Low performers are not automatically fired for being in one bracket – warnings should always be given first. It should be looked at as a development tool. Forced ranking engages the manager to provide assessments of employees and forces them to communicate the tough stuff with their employees. It holds the managers accountable for their workforce. “The great value of using a forced ranking process doesn’t result merely from plunking people into different buckets,” he says. “The payoff comes from the action that is taken with each person following the assessment sessions.” (Bates, 2003)…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Sustaining Employee Performance
    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sustaining Employee Performance

    The general function of performance management systems in organizations is for employers to manage employees’ performance and development by providing individual feedback on their performance evaluation to identify and plan measurable areas for personal development to ensure the organization’s strategic goals are being met (DeCenzo and Robbins, 2007). For years, many organizations provided appraisal type performance reviews to their employees that ranked them against other employees. This type of ranking system is problematic, as it is unfair to compare employees from different departments who’s primary goals may be different from one another and can viewed as putting down employees who may be unable to put in as many hours or as much effort as others who have only one set project at a time and can bog down to set higher numbers. If employee development is not properly measured and managed, the organization may find it difficult to meet their strategic goals. This in turn can create complications between mainstream workers and management, as well as the company, and their customers.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Job Evaluation
    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Job Evaluation

    Jobs are usually ranked in each department and then the department rankings are combined to develop an organizational ranking. The following table is a hypothetical illustration of ranking of jobs.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should Organisations "Rank and Yank"?
    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should Organisations "Rank and Yank"?

    No. I do not believe that organizations should “rank-and-yank” and see that as a solution to evaluate and improve the performance of their employees, simply because it motivates risk-taking at both ends of the performance spectrum.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paterson Job Grading System
    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Paterson Job Grading System

    The Paterson grading system is an analytical method of job evaluation, used predominantly in South Africa. It analyzes decision-making in job task performance or job descriptions, and sorts jobs into six groups that are graded and grouped into two to three sub-grades--such as stress factors, individual tolerance, length of job and number of job responsibilities--that correspond to organizational levels. The six grades, also called bands, define pay scales.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics