Preview

People Should Not Buy Animal Tested Products

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
99 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
People Should Not Buy Animal Tested Products
Using innocent animals for dreadful scientific and commercial testing is not right. A majority of animals used in research are either killed during the experiment or they are euthanized afterwards (Humane society, 2016). Even though animal testing makes some discoveries, 92% of those are harmful to humans, plus there are other testing methods that come at a significantly lower price. To help reduce the amount of animal testing, people should not buy animal tested products, because if no one buys the products then there will be no need for testing, plus animals and humans will be over all safer.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is wasteful, useless, and dangerous. The experiments that are done on these animals are gruesome. Bountiful amounts of people (about 62% in 2004 according to Heather Mason Kiefer) argue that animal testing is necessary in order to produce safe products. On the contrary, several studies have found these methods to be questionable. They lack accurate, safe results.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hey hey

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cosmetic and drug companies continually face opposition due to the fact that they use animals for the testing of their products. Some feel that this procedure goes against the rights which are given to all living beings, including animals, while others see the positive impact that animal testing brings to the lives of human beings.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall, animal testing is erroneous because it does not contribute anything meaningfully to the world. When animals are tested often the results are irrelevant, due to the fact, animals have many differences from humans. Also, the animals endure poor conditions. Lastly, the animals’ lives are wasted by being tested on products that are not important. Testing animals is abusive and needs to…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first reason why we shouldn’t have animal testing is because animals are getting hurt or abused. “Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year.” The chemicals that the people are using are burning or other worse things to them. The chemicals that they use on the animals could hurt or kill them. Over half of side effects cannot be detected in…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Animal Testing

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Animal testing has been going on for a couple of years now. Scientists use animal testing as a form of “safe” testing. According to Humane Society International, animal testing is, “Procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into the basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals. (1)” Many companies use animal testing because it is easier, or more ethical, to…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Against Animal Testing

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is true, but it overlooks that someone will still have to be the first human to test the product regardless. The Food and Drug administration requires some testing, but there are alternatives that cost less and take less time, and are more accurate than animal testing. Harvard's Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering has created “organs on chips” which are made with living human cells. These chips can replace animal testing in the future. Wyss researchers wrote on the organs-on-chips project page, "Clinical studies take years to complete and testing a single compound can cost more than $2 million. Meanwhile, innumerable animal lives are lost, and the process often fails to predict human responses." In conclusion, in order to end animal testing, it needs to be harder to violate the Animal Welfare Act and more appealing to consider alternatives. I wish to end with a quote by Professor Charles R. Magel, “Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: ‘Because they are like us,’ ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is: ‘Because the animals are not like…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Surprisingly enough, a voluminous amount of companies worldwide are relying on harmless animal testing to make products that you use every day. Businesses such as Band-Aid brand, Colgate, Pert, and even Revlon use this process to make your favorite items that are vital to healing skin, help you to clean your teeth, and keep your hair clean. It is known that animal testing can sometimes be cruel for the animal, but that is only a small percentage of the animals being tested on. Undeniably, animal testing should be allowed because there are many laws protecting the animals being tested on, new vital medicines come from theses harmless tests, and most if the time the animal being tested on benefits from the test being performed.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people today can say they love their pet, whether it is a dog, a cat, a rabbit, or fish. Little do we actually think about the animals suffering to the torture of cruel animal testing that goes on behind the scenes of the company’s we love. Maybelline, Head and Shoulders, and Clorox are all companies that test on animals, yet are still supported by the thousands of people that buy and use their products. I believe the main reason people continue to support companies that perform animal testing is because society today is not informed or educated about the severity of animal testing. People do not know or care to research if a company performs animal testing. Besides consumers keeping these companies alive and running, animal testing is not humane or morally right. It has been scientifically proven that animals can to a certain extent feel pain (Tell Me if it Hurts: Investigating Whether Animals Feel Pain by Caroline…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Flaws

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal testing has always been a dispute between people; some people think it’s morally wrong and some people think it helps with medical and scientific breakthroughs. Drugs that people use or cosmetics that are used could have been tested through animals before being stocked on shelves. About 800 animals are tested on before a drug is passed to clinical trials (“Is animal”). Many animals get tested on, but many like mice, rabbits, hamsters, monkeys, dogs, cats, pigs, and some other animals get tested on. Animals can be used to find new advances in medical treatment and check safety for products, but these animals that get tested on can go through pain and death. Animal testing is wrong and should be stopped because…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros Of Animal Testing

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are several limitations to animal testing, such as, the physical differences between an animal and human skin. Human skin can be more sensitive to certain chemicals than animal skin. Many times, some chemicals pass the test with animals but not with humans. Using alternatives to animal testing can give more accurate results and it is cheaper. Many cosmetic companies that insure the animals being tested on are not treated poorly, but in reality they are. Hundreds of animals die every day due to the fact that people pour so much chemicals onto their skin to test toxicity levels. Animals cannot talk and that is why people need to be their voices. Consumers have the power to stop animal testing by not buying animal tested products. Experimentation on animals is unnecessary and cruel. Even though there are some animals who share an enormous amount of DNA with humans, human skin still differs from animal…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing has been a topic of debate for many generations. It is difficult to imagine a common house hold pet subjected to extreme procedures of the mildest and painless form to the harshest form imaginable. I am talking about your average mouse, rabbit, cat or dog. At the same time, consumers want to be assured they are using the safest products available, and people want science to find cures for life-threatening diseases. Lately, science has tried to prove out theories and hypnosis through computer algorithms but we still have to rely on physical subjects like the animals referenced. There is no public argument that says we should not test products before entering the market, the debate is the method by which these products should be tested. Animal testing is necessary for biomedical research, but should be eradicated for vanity reasons in terms of cosmetics.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poor defenseless animals fight for their lives every day to test out products they have no use for. These poor sweet creatures have been taken away their right to live to be caged and mistreated and they can’t do anything but sit there and take it. Day to day, more and more animals are dying at the cruel hands of these scientists. Animal Testing is an act of animal cruelty, because it is inhumane, there are other methods that can be used to avoid harming…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the FDA encourages manufacturers to conduct whatever testing is necessary to ensure the safety of their products, it does not specifically require the use of animals. (FDA) The FDA actually encourages companies to consider alternatives before deciding that testing on animals is necessary. They advocate that research and testing for products use a maximum amount of useful scientific information and a minimal number of animals tested. When testing does occur, they advocate for the most humane methods available. The Food and Drug Administration supports the Animal Welfare Act and the Public Health Service Policy of Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. If companies are not required by the FDA to test their products on animals, there is no reason that it should be a method that is resorted to for experimentation.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only does animal testing hurt the animals they use, but it could ultimately kill them. Most often primates are used for nor logical testing which is testing on the brain (Jeory n.p.). Testing on the brain is highly dangerous and most likely ends in failure and the blood of innocent creatures in on the scientist's hands. Testing on animals is a highly dangerous game to play and sadly most companies do not care how many they kill before finding a combination of their product that actually…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the main reasons I am against animal testing is the fact that the animals don’t have a choice and are being forced to be tested, which can lead to them getting seriously ill or dying as a cause of the testing. Each year in the USA alone, an estimate of 70 million animals are taken away from their natural habitat, blinded, scalded, force-fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, and basically hurt and killed in the name of science, by private institutions, household product and cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centres. That is not right in my opinion and I don’t particularly see how it can be right in any morally correct human being’s opinion. So many animals experience pain or suffering and can do nothing about it, they are powerless in these situations and that is not fair, it’s not right. According to the Humane Society, registration of a single pesticide requires more than 50 experiments and the use of as many as 12, 000 animals, that statistic angers me and makes me fear for the potentially affected animals if these tests are to continue. To think that some of these tests are for cosmetic products such as make-up, nail varnish etc. leads me to believe that all the pain and suffering caused isn’t necessary and could be reduced to an extent, if not eradicated. If the animals can’t make the choice, then we can’t make the choice for them.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays