Preview

Pecularitiies

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8510 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pecularitiies
20. Political Discourse

JOHN WILSON

Subject Linguistics » Discourse Analysis

Key-Topics political

DOI: 10.1111/b.9780631205968.2003.00021.x

0 Introduction

The study of political discourse, like that of other areas of discourse analysis, covers a broad range of subject matter, and draws on a wide range of analytic methods. Perhaps more than with other areas of discourse, however, one needs at the outset to consider the reflexive and potentially ambiguous nature of the term political discourse. The term is suggestive of at least two possibilities: first, a discourse which is itself political; and second, an analysis of political discourse as simply an example discourse type, without explicit reference to political content or political context. But things may be even more confusing. Given that on some definitions almost all discourse may be considered political (Shapiro 1981), then all analyses of discourse are potentially political, and, therefore, on one level, all discourse analysis is political discourse.
This potentially confusing situation arises, in the main, from definitions of the political in terms of general issues such as power, conflict, control, or domination (see Fairclough 1992a, 1995; Giddens 1991; Bourdieu 1991; van Dijk 1993; Chilton and Schaffer 1997), since any of these concepts may be employed in almost any form of discourse. Recently, for example, in a study of a psychotherapeutic training institution, Diamond (1995) refers to her study of the discourse of staff meetings as “political,” simply because issues of power and control are being worked out. They are being worked out at different levels, however: at interpersonal, personal, institutional, and educational levels for example, and in different strategic ways (Chilton 1997). By treating all discourse as political, in its most general sense, we may be in danger of significantly overgeneralizing the concept of political discourse.
Perhaps we might avoid these



References: Aristotle. (1991) On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civil Discourse, trans G. Kennedy . Oxford: Oxford University Press . Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogical Imagination , ed. M. Holquist, trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press . Bolinger, D. (1982) Language: The Loaded Weapon London: Longman . Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power Cambridge: Polity . Cameron, D. (1995) Verbal Hygiene London: Routledge and Kegan Paul . Carbonell, J. G. (1978) POLITICS: automated ideological reasoning . Cognitive Science (2) , 27 51. Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (1986) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology Norwood, NJ: Ablex . Chilton, P. (1985) Words, discourse and metaphors: the meanings of deter, deterrent and deterrence . In P. Chilton (ed.), Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate . London: Pinter , 103 27. Chilton, P. (1987) Discourse and politics . In T. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction . London: Sage , 206 30. Chilton, P. (1990) Politeness and politics . Discourse and Society (1) (2), 201 24. Chilton, P. and Ilyin, M. (1993) Metaphor in political discourse. The case of the common European house . Discourse and Society (4) (7), 7 31. Chilton, P. and Schaffer, C. (1997) Discourse and politics . In T. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. Vol. 2 . London: Sage , 206 31. Cicero. (1971) Selected Works , trans. M. Grant. Harmondsworth: Penguin . Diamond, P. (1995) Status and Power in Verbal Interaction: A Study of Discourse in a Close-knit Social Network Amsterdam: Benjamins . Dunmire, P. L. (1995) Realising the hypothetical: a critical linguistic analysis of a projected event . Paper presented to the conference on Political Linguistics, University of Antwerp . Edleman, M. (1971) Politics as Symbolic Action New York: Academic Press . Edleman, M. (1977) Political Language New York: Academic Press . Edleman, M. (1988) Constructing the Political Spectacle Chicago: University of Chicago Press . Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992a) Discursive Psychology London: Sage . Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power London: Longman . Fairclough, N. (1992a) Discourse and Social Change Oxford: Blackwell . Fairclough, N. (1992b) Critical Language Awareness London: Longman . Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Linguistics London: Longman . Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) Critical discourse analysis . In T. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. Vol. 2 . London: Sage , 258 85. Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge London: Tavistock Publications . Fowler, R. and Marshall, J. (1985) Power . In T. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis . London: Academic Press , 47 63. Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., and Trew, T. (eds) (1979) Language and Control London: Routledge and Kegan Paul . Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall . Gastil, J. (1993) Undemocratic discourse: a review of theory and research on political discourse . Discourse and Society (3) (4), 469 500. Geis, M. (1987) The Language of Politics New York: Springer Verlag . Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self Identity Cambridge: Polity . Gill, A. M. and Whedbee, K. (1997) Rhetoric . In T. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Structure and Social Process . London: Sage , 157 85. Goodman, S. (1996) Visual English . In S. Goodman and D. Graddol (eds), Redesigning English: New Texts, New Identities . London: Routledge , 38 72. Graber, D. A. (1981) Political languages . In D. Nimmo and K. Sanders (eds), Handbook of Political Communication . Beverly Hills: Sage , 195 224. Gunn, B. (1989) The Politic Word. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Ulster at Jordanstown . Halliday, M. A. K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar London: Arnold . Hansard Offical Report, November 1st, 1993. Hansard Official Report, November 29th, 1993. Hart, R. P. (1985) Systematic analysis of political discourse: the development of DICTION . In K. R. Sanders, L. L. Kaid, and D. Nimmo (eds), Political Communication Yearbook 1984 . Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press , 92 137. Hodge, B. and Fowler, R. (1979) Orwellian linguistics. In Fowler et al. (1979) . Holly, W. (1989) Credibility and Political Language . In R. Wodak (ed.), Language Power and Ideology . Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 115 35. Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. W. (1972) The Dialectic of Enlightenment New York: Herder and Herder . Kress, G. (1988) Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice Oxford: Oxford University Press . Kress, G. and Hodge, G. (1979) Language as Ideology London: Routledge . Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1990) Reading Images . Deakin, Vic.: Deakin University . Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design London: Routledge and Kegan Paul . Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By Chicago: University of Chicago Press . Lambert, W., Hodgson, R. Gardner, and Fillenbaum, S. (1960) Evaluative reactions to spoken language . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology (60) , 44 51. Leech, G. (1995) Semantics Harmondsworth: Penguin . Liebes, T. and Ribak, R. (1991) A mother 's battle against TV news: a case study of political socialisation . Discourse and Society (2) (2), 202 22. Lippi-Green, R. (1997) English With An Accent London: Routledge and Kegan Paul . Lwaitama, A. F. (1988) Variations in the use of personal pronouns in the political oratory of J. K. Nyerere and A. H. Mwinyi . Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics (1) , 1 23. Maitland, K. and Wilson, J. (1987) Ideological conflict and pronominal resolution . Journal of Pragmatics (11) , 495 512. Montgomery, M. (1992) An Introduction to Language and Society London: Routledge . Moss, P. (1985) The rhetoric of defence in the United States: language myth and ideology . In P. Chilton (ed.), Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate . London: Pinter , 45 62. Navasky, V. (1982) Naming Names Boston: John Calder . Neaman, J. S. and Sliver, C. G. (1990) Kind Words New York: Facts on File . Ochs, E. and Taylor, C. (1992) Family narratives as political activity . Discourse and Society (3) (3), 301 40. Orwell, G. (1969) Politics and the English language . In W. F. Bolton and D. Crystal (eds), The English Language Vol. 2: Essays by Linguists and Men of Letters, 1858–1964 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 217 19. Pateman, T. (1981) Linguistics as a branch of critical theory . UEA Papers in Linguistics (14–15) , 1 29. Pěcheux, M. (1982) Language Semantics and Ideology London: Macmillan . Pěcheux, M. (1978) Discourse-structure or event . In C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture . London: Macmillan , 251 66. Richardson, K. (1985) Pragmatics of speeches against the peace movement in Britain: a case study . In P. Chilton (ed.), Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate . London: Pinter , 23 40. Richardson, K. (1991) The debate about nukespeak . Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics (11) , 15 48. Rose, J. (1989) The Relevance of Ulster Politics . Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Communication, University of Ulster at Jordanstown . Schank, R. and Ableson, R. P. (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum . Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers Cambridge: Cambridge University Press . Shapiro, M. J. (1981) Language and Political Understanding New Haven, CT: Yale University Press . Simpson, P. (1988) Language and ideology . Critical Studies in Mass Communication (7) , 166 88. Simpson, P. (1993) Language Ideology and Point of View London: Routledge and Kegan Paul . Sperber, B. and Wilson, D. (1996) Relevance . Oxford: Blackwell . St Evans, J. B. (1989) Bias in Human Reasoning Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum . Steiner, E. (1985) The concept of context and the theory of action . In P. Chilton (ed.), Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate . London: Pinter , 213 27. Stubbs, M. (1990) Knowledge about language: grammar, ignorance and society . Special professorial lecture . Institute of Education, University of London . Stubbs, M. (1996) Text and Corpus Analysis Oxford: Blackwell . Torode, B. (1991) Review of Fairclough, N., Language and Power (1989) . Discourse and Society (2) (1), 121 2. van Dijk, T. (1989) Structures of discourse and structures of power . In J. A. Anderson (ed.), Communication Yearbook 12 . Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 163 83. van Dijk, T. (1991) Racism and the Press . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul , van Dijk, T Wiesner, M. J. (1991) Mario M. Cuomo decides to run: the construction of the political self . Discourse and Society (2) (1), 85 104. Wilson, J. (1990) Politically Speaking Oxford: Blackwell . Wilson, J. (1993) Discourse marking and accounts of violence in Northern Ireland . Text (13) (3), 455 75. Wilson, J. (1997) Metalinguistic negation and textual aspects of political discourse . In J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds), Political Linguistics . Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 69 89. Wilson, J. and Gunn, B. (1983) Political affiliation. Paper presented to Sociolinguistics Symposium, University of Liverpool . Wilson, J. and O Brian, K. (1998) Language gender and employability . Mimeo, School of Behavioural and Communication Sciences, University of Ulster . Wilson, J. and Rose, J. (1997) The language of peace and conflict: Relevance Theory and the Anglo-Irish agreement . Journal of Conflict Studies (XVII) (2), 51 73. Wodak, R. (1989) 1968: The power of political jargon – a “Club 2” discussion . In R. Wodak (ed.), Language Power and Ideology . Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 137 63. Wodak, R. (1995) Disorders of Discourse London: Longman .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The purpose of this assignment was to be able to identify the concept of discourse community as introduced by John Swales in a fictional character. I do feel that my team and I accomplished the purpose of this assignment as we develop the required guidelines as they were asked such as the discourse community map and the activity system triangle. Our map was clear and we identified the three discourse communities each one of my teammates knew the content. As I learned indeed John Swales discourse communities may be used in my future career as a future lawyer I would be using more than one of the six characteristics that Swales defined such as lexis, common goals, intercommunication among its members, and feedback.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Argument Culture” is a persuasive essay written by Professor Deborah Tannen. As a professor of linguistics at Georgetown University, Tannen experience in language leads her to write many books in this field. Tannen uses “The Argument Culture” essay to persuade her audience that this society’s way of looking at debate encourages an “adversarial frame of mind” (Tannen, 305). Three of Tannen’s main points include; polarized views in the news, the use of “war metaphors’ by media to catch the readers eye, and even in the language mankind uses in everyday life. Tannen’s essay also includes different ways to look at these each of these situations that may help reduce the debate language that this society uses every day.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gee illustrates this point in saying “Discourses are ways of being in the world: they are forms of life which integrate words, acts, values, beliefs, attitudes, and social identities as well as gestures, glances, body positions, and clothes”(484). This thought in part agrees with Swales stated criteria for a discourse community being “A Discourse community has a broadly agreed set of common public goals”(471). This criteria does not directly link Swales and Gees thoughts, Swales idea of a “common public goal”(471) leads the members of a discourse community to express their beliefs, attitudes, and values that Gee outlines as important factors of a Discourse community. This notion separates a discourse community from a speech community, for Swales, as well as a Discourse community from a discourse…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Perelman, Chaim and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, tr John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise On argumentation. Notre Dame, IN : University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meritocracy Fair

    • 2968 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The culture of critical discourse (CDD) is characterized by speech that is relatively more situation-free, more context of field “independent”.…

    • 2968 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Burke, Kenneth. "Traditional Principles of Rhetoric." A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: U of California, 1969. 20-65. Print.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The concept of Discourse and discourse community is very important in English reading and writing. Discourses are group members’ shared “ways of being in the world” (Gee 484). According to the authors we studied, Porter, Gee, Swales, Johns and Porter, we willingly or unwillingly are part of many different discourse communities or Discourses. Almost everything we do in our everyday life requires involvement in some discourse community. Discourse or discourse community is a very broad topic. The scholars we studied talk about their own points of views on Discourses and discourse communities which can be interpreted to get a more general…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Discourses, using spoken or written language in a social context, are more than narratives of human existence. A contemporary feminist author and professor, Chris Weedon, paraphrases French philosopher, Michel Foucault in the following passage: (discourses are) “ways of constituting knowledge, together with the social practices, forms of subjectivity and power relations which inhere in such knowledges and relations between them. Discourses are more than ways of thinking and producing meaning. They constitute the 'nature ' of the body, unconscious and conscious mind and emotional life of the subjects they seek to govern” (Weedon, 1987, p. 108). This definition…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Discourse Community

    • 1279 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Swales, J. (2014). The Concept of Discourse Community. In Reading and Writing for ENG 100: Writing Seminar 1 (3rd ed., pp. 218-230). Boston: Bedford.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    We use language to communicate with each other regardless of where we live in this world. We can either speak or write literally or figuratively. In literal language we say or write exactly what we mean while in figurative language our meaning is less obvious. In the following pages we will look at some of the figurative language adopted by the English language. For each term I will give the definition, followed by an example. I will then describe an appropriate circumstance for using the example and when it might lead to misunderstanding.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    discourses and representations do not only reflect what people see or have in mind, but that they also…

    • 8790 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discourses is an element of all concrete social events (actions, processes) as well as of more durable social practices, though neither are simply discourse: they are articulations of discourse with non-discoursal elements. ‘Discourse’ subsumes language as well as other forms of semiosis such as visual images and ‘body language’, and the discoursal element of a social event often combines different semiotic forms (eg a television programme). But the use of the ‘term ‘discourse’ rather than ‘language’ is not purely or even primarily motivated by the diversity of forms of semiosis, it is primarily registers a relational way of seeing semiosis[i], as one element of social events and practices dialectically interconnected with other elements. The overriding objective of discourse analysis, on this view, is not simply analysis of discourse per se, but analysis of the dialectical relations between discourse and non-discoursal elements of the social, in order to reach a better understanding of these complex relations (including how changes in discourse can cause changes in other elements). But if we are to analyse relations between discourse and non-discoursal elements, we must obviously see them as ontologically (and not just epistemologically, analytically) different elements of the social. They are different, but they are not discrete – that is, they are dialectically related, in the sense that elements ‘internalize’ other elements, without being reducible to them (Harvey 1996, Chouliaraki & Fairclough 1999, Fairclough 2003, Fairclough, Jessop & Sayer 2004).…

    • 5883 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essay “Politics and the English Language” by George Orwell shows that most individuals use the English language improperly. Writers should “get one’s meaning as clear as one can through pictures and sensations” (Orwell, 8). Many individuals are aware of the common misusage of the English language today, but in general do not believe that they are capable of taking action. If action is taken, individuals will be able to understand the language more clearly. Orwell’s purpose is to show that the English language is getting corrupted by politics and author’s bad habits.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Swales, John. “The Concept of Discourse Community” in Wardle, Elizabeth and Doug Downs, Ed. Writing about Writing: A College Reader. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2011. 466-480.…

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Making Sense of Dance Music

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages

    To analyse the construction of social relationships and create an understanding of the social world, discourse analysis is an often-used tool.…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays