Peaceful Resistance To Law Negatively Affect A Free Society

Many people are brutalized in everyday life. For decades people have never been treated equally for reasons as race, religion, and different background. Peaceful resistance to law doesn't positively or negatively impact a free society. It is neutral and in the situation people are put in. Therefore, because the society isn't a free society. In the year 2016, many people of all colors were killed and brutalized by the government and police. When African Americans were being killed by police for no specific reason, people decided to do something about it. Some people went to violence, while others just went to peaceful protests. Within these actions people either marched, started fires, and even related horrific violence. Either way how …show more content…
During this time, it was the law that colors would have to move for whites if needed. Rosa Parks wasn't the first one, but however it then started a movement. She got arrested for disobeying the driver and law. However, she didn't act violently or negatively. During this whole process she remained calm and peaceful. As many african americans were tired of being differently. All segregation negatively affected colored people in various ways in restaurants, busses, and even education. Rosa Parks was focused on equality for all people. This demonstrates that though she acted peacefully and non violently, it doesn't have a positive impact of free society. Furthermore, because the society wasn't free. Although, she did greatly impact societies by giving people a sense of freedom in order to stand up for themselves. In conclusion, being true to what you believe in will give you a sense of satisfaction. No matter the outcome it is what you believe in. Someone else opinion should't stop you from your goal. However, violence should not be included in the process. Violence will make one look ignorant, and there point will not be heard. Marches and protests are the way to get