Paul Auster

Topics: September 11 attacks, Don DeLillo, World Trade Center Pages: 22 (6698 words) Published: January 13, 2013
The insistent realism of
Don DeLillo’s ‘Falling Man’
and Paul Auster’s ‘Man in the Dark’
by Ugo


During the last decade, many theorists and writers have remarked the peculiar fictionalisation of the facts of 9/11. For instance, as Salman Rushdie explains, “we all crossed a frontier that day, an invisible boundary between the imaginable and the unimaginable, and it turned out to be the unimaginable that was real” (Rushdie 2002: 436-437). Martin Amis pointed out that September 11 “marked the apotheosis of the postmodern era – the era of images and perception” (Amis 2001: G2). Similarly, in relation to the September 11 attacks, Slavoj Žižek argued that “in contrast to the Barthesian effet du réel, in which the text makes us accept its fictional product as ‘real’, here, the Real itself, in order to be sustained, has to be perceived as a nightmarish unreal spectre” (Žižek 2002: 19). The Western perception of reality was abruptly disturbed by the fall of one of the symbols of late capitalism operated by terrorist attacks that looked as if they appeared from another, external and exotic, dimension. As Žižek states,

We should therefore invert the standard reading according to which the WTC explosions were the intrusion of the Real which shattered our illusory sphere: quite the reverse - it was before the WTC collapse that we lived in our reality, perceiving Third World horrors as something which was not actually part of our social reality, as something which existed (for us) as a spectral apparition on the (TV) screen - and what happened on September 11 was that this fantasmatic

9/11/2011 – 11/2011


screen apparition entered our reality. It is not that reality entered our image: the image entered and shattered our reality (i.e. the symbolic coordinates which determine what we experience as reality) (Ibid.: 16).

On the literary side, many U.S. novelists such as Jonathan Safran Foer (Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, 2005), Jay McInerney (The Good Life, 2006), Ken Kalfus (A Disorder Peculiar to the Country, 2006), Don DeLillo (Falling Man, 2007), John Updike (The Terrorist, 2007) and Paul Auster (Man in the Dark, 2008) attempted to confront the events of 9/11 and its aftermath. The aim of this article is to understand how Don DeLillo’s Falling Man and Paul Auster’s Man in The Dark tried to find a way to present the uncanny events of 9/11 and the subsequent horrors of the Iraq war through a complex recourse to realism. Both Auster and DeLillo have been defined as two of the most relevant authors of the postmodernist American literature of the last decades. DeLillo has been often considered “the pre-eminent analyst of the age of the spectacle, the poet laureate of the simulacrum, of the depthless image floating above a social vacuum” (Evans 2006: 104), while, at the same time, since the publication of City of Glass (1985), “Paul Auster was hailed as the latest in a series of American authors who could be labeled ‘postmodernist’” (Brendan 2008: 1). The works of fiction published by these two authors seem to share what Hans Bertens defines as the “common denominator” of all the numberless definitions of Postmodernism, namely “a crisis in representation, a deeply felt loss of faith in our ability to represent the real, in the widest sense” (Bertens 1995: 11). However, if we can still notice the attitude to diagnose this crisis of representation in their latest works of fiction, such as DeLillo’s Underworld (1997) or Auster’s Oracle Nights (2004), we can undoubtedly remark “a restoration of access to the real” (Evans 2006: 104) and an attention “to the transient nature of human existence” (Brendan 2008: introd., x).1

In Falling Man and in Man in the Dark this double tendency towards the crisis of representation results particularly linked to the uncanny nature of the WTC attacks and the Iraq war and the subsequent traumas turning character’s lives and behaviours upside down....

Cited: Amend C. and G. Diez, 2008, “I Don’t Know America Anymore”, Interview with
(March 22, 2011).
Amis M., 2001, “Fear and Loathing”, The Guardian, 18 Sept. 2001, G2.
Auster P., 2007, Man in The Dark, Henry Holt and Company, New York.
Baudrillard J., 2002, The Spirit of Terrorism and Requiem for the Twin Towers,
Bertens H., 1995, The Idea of the Postmodern. A History, Routledge, London-New
Brauner D., 2008/2009, “‘The Days After’ and ‘the Ordinary Run of Hours’.
Brendan M., 2008, Paul Auster 's Postmodernity, Routledge, London-New York.
Conte J. M., 2008, “Conclusion: Writing amid the ruins: 9/11 and Cosmopolis,” in
Duvall J
Cvek S., 2009, “Killing Politics: The Art of Recovery in Falling Man”, Studia
Romanica et Anglica Zagrabensia, Vol
(April 10, 2011); “In the
Ruins of the Future
(April 10, 2011);
2007, Falling Man, Scribner, New York.
Dirda M., 2008, “Spellbound”, The New York Review of Books, December 4, 2008,
(March 3,
Evans D. H. 2006, “Taking Out the Trash. Don DeLillo’s Underworld, Liquid
Modernity, and the End of Garbage”, The Cambridge Quarterly, 35.2, pp
Gleason P., 2002, “Don DeLillo, T.S. Eliot, and the Redemption of America’s
Atomic Waste Land”, in Dewey - Kellman - Malin (eds.), Underwords
Gray R., 2009, “Open Doors, Closed Minds. American Prose Writing at a Time of
Crisis”, American Literary History, 21.1., pp
Hassan I., 2003, “Beyond Postmodernism. Toward an Aesthetic of Trust”, in K.
Houen A., 2004, “Novel Spaces and Taking Place(s) in the Wake of September 11”,
Hughes, W., 2004, “What Happened to Nick Berg? Father of Nick Berg Blasts
Bush-Cheney Administration”, The Baltimore Chronicle, June 7, 2004,
<> (March 29, 2011).
McGlone J., 2008, “A voice in the darkness - Paul Auster interview”, The
Scotsman, 30 August 2008, (April 12, 2011).
Morley C., 2008, “Plotting against America: 9/11 and the spectacle of terror in
contemporary American fiction”, Gramma/Γράμμα: Journal of Theory and Criticism, 16,
Morley C., 2008/2009, “The End of Innocence: Tales of Terror after 9/11”, Review
of International American Studies, Special Issue
Osteen, M., 2000, American Magic and Dread. Don DeLillo’s Dialog with Culture,
University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Rothberg M, 2009, “A Failure of the Imagination: Diagnosing the Post-9/11 Novel:
A Response to Richard Gray”, American Literary History, 21.1, pp
Rushdie S., 2002, Step Across This Line. Collected Nonfiction 1992-2002, Random
House, New York.
Simonetti P., 2011, “Loss, Ruins, War: Paul Auster’s Response to 9/11 and the ‘War
Skinner Q., 2002, “A Third Concept of Liberty”, London Review of Books, 24.7,
(February 18, 2011).
Varvogli A., 2008/2009, “Ailing Authors: Paul Auster’s Travels in the Scriptorium
and Philip Roth’s Exit Ghost”, Review of International American Studies, Special Issue.
Žižek S., 2002, Welcome to the Desert of the Real! Five Essays on September 11
and Related Dates, Verso, London-New York.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Quinn's Character in Paul Auster's City of Glass Essay
  • Paul Auster's The New York Trilogy: City of Glass, Ghosts and the Locked Room Essay
  • The Dilemma of the Postmodern Writer as Seen Through Paul Auster's City of Glass Essay
  • Paul Auster Essay
  • Critical Analysis on Paul Auster's the New York Trilogy Essay
  • A Lacanian Analysis of Paul Auster's New York Trilogy Essay
  • Paul of Tarsus Essay
  • Paul Poiret Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free