Preview

Patricians And The Plebeian's Role In Roman Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
448 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Patricians And The Plebeian's Role In Roman Society
From the beginning of the Empire, Roman society was divided between patricians and plebeians. The first, rich citizens, could enter the senate, the magistracy, and the military post. The less fortunate citizens, the plebeians, could enlist in the army for a long career of about twenty years.

The plebeian is a movement opposed to the patriciate and to the oligarchical institutions of the city which favor it. It welcomes all those who adhere to its ideals, and thus approaches a party, or a union. It does not exclude anyone: there are not those who do not want to be part of it: patricians, clients. Thus, some patricians are part of the plebs, since we are plebs by choice.

The richest part of the plebeians, living like some patricians, because they were just below the requisite level, or were engaged in professions incompatible with the dignitas of the nobility. Some of their ascendants or descendants, possessing the census, will continue the course honorum.

* Negatiores are wholesale merchants.

* Argentarii are financiers. This profession requires funds well above the minimum but is incompatible with a good man [1]. Some were
…show more content…
They are citizens, freedmen or peregrines. They may possess slaves to assist them in their work, to own or to rent their stalls. They are very quickly subject to political uncertainties and monetary crises. They are part of the population that can create the troubles that regularly shake Rome. Especially as they form 'collegia' under the direction of a magister to defend their punctual interests (tax, improvement of supply, lower interest rates). We also have the plebs of the shallows and it is better known than the proletarii because it has much more intrigued and worried the upper classes. Some indigent are ready for any low action for some parts; civically uncontrollable, they can become dangerous in case of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap World History Dbq

    • 3642 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Consequences in the Roman Empire were also shown between the patricians and the plebeians. During the fifth century B.C.E, relations between the classes became so strained that the plebeians threatened to succeed from Rome and establish a rival settlement. This eventually led to the establishment of tribunes which altered the Roman government.…

    • 3642 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were supposed to pay taxes and fight in battles. Which I think is wrong because nobody should be forced into battle. Plebs were also not allowed to vote in decision over wars and peace. They called the patrician the privileged class in Rome. They were the rich and had everything the plebs didn't. Plebes struggle with equal rights but soon got them.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    |Conflict of Orders- Patricians vs. Plebeians became a fight between the rich wealthy class and the majority peasant class |…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To obtain political rights, the common people (Plebeians) formed their own assembly, the Concillum Plebus and named their leaders tribunes.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Early Roman Empires DBQ

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Forum was the central gathering for the Romans. The Forum was considered to be their capital, and with a centralized place, comes centralized government and laws (8). The Romans also held the importance of Senators, and ruling office very close. The senators were the ones who were able to keep the native-born citizens living a hectic free lifestyle (5). Religious views and inputs were also held very high in Rome. The Romans placed material goods higher up in their life (6). Rome also classified their citizens into three different social categories. First were the Egyptians and natives who were very poor citizens, second was the mercenaries who were an undiscipled body, and the third was Alexandrians who unlike their mercenaries, followed the Hellenistic customs, and were of Greek origin (10).…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Romans had a basic law of sorts, called the laws of the Twelve Tables. This governed a lot of Roman daily life and proceedings, and was the basis of a sort of equal rights scheme for the plebeian class. In addition to this, the Lex Hortensia, passed in 287BC, further blurred the distinctions between plebeians and patricians. The twelve tables, and any laws passed by a plebeian assembly, would now be binding to both plebeians and patricians, a sort of social justice.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patricians are the type of people that were descendents from the most ancient noble families. The patricians live in large estates, and own lands This also either marry or do business with people from their own class. Along with the plebeians and patricians there was also an emperor, equestrians, the senate, free slaves and slaves. The emperor ruled over the people of Rome and equestrians were affluent landowners, and also people who chose business over politics. Freed slaves are slaves that have been freed by either their master or were bought out of slavery, and slaves are the ones who still work for their masters or sometimes they are generally prisoners of…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imperial Rome’s political control was mainly based on social status. For instance wealthy men dominated over women, and poor men. They had a written code of law that offered plebeians (poorer class) protection from abuse. This gave the plebeians an opportunity to shape public policy. Romans took great pride in this, and believed they enjoyed greater freedom than most of their neighbors. They had a rule of law, the rights of citizens, the absences of pretension, upright moral behavior, and keeping ones word. This was later recognized as “the way of the ancestors.”…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This land connected these people to Rome. It provided a bond much stronger than just citizenship alone. It gave a majority of the population something to fight for; something to defend; something to inherit and to leave to their children. The replacement of this peasantry class by the latifundia's of the wealthy started the crumbling of the Republic. Plutarch writes that "the poor, who had been ejected from their land, no longer showed themselves eager for military service, and neglected the bringing up of children, so that soon all Italy was filled with gangs of foreign slaves, by whose aid the rich cultivated their estates, from which they had driven away the free citizens." Similarly, Appian comments that "certain powerful men became extremely rich and the race of slaves multiplied throughout the country, while the Italian people dwindled in numbers and strength, being oppressed by penury, taxes, and military service."…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    n order to to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community in Sparta it meant that you had to be a warrior. Sparta was a Oligarchy witch means "rule of the few". In Athens in order to participate in public life and make decisions you had to be native born, male and free. In Athens your political standing depended on you wealth. The men with the highest wealth could seek the highest political offices. The next step down the ladder were men with slightly less wealth referred to as the horse men. The horse men could serve in lesser political offices and join the army. The middle class could only be elected to low level political offices. The poor and the landless could vote but not hold office or be in the army however they could row the ships. Sparta had far fewer…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many rich citizens, known as Patricians bought slaves to do their work. As a result, the abundance of slaves took away farmers’ jobs. In addition, they promoted the increase of latifundias, or ranches that slaves work in, which was a factor to the growth of slaves dominating agriculture and causing farmers to flee to cities. Therefore, this added to the rate of unemployment in Rome. For that reason, low pay was given to workers, another jab at the falling economy. Part of the money went to the army and government, so it hindered Rome to a suppressing taxation. Tenants fled from their farms, and businessmen fled from their jobs. Private businesses were disintegrated. For that reason, the state government had no other choice but to take over countless companies. Now the government has to juggle with their own problems and the private businesses too. Even though slaves were taking away jobs, Rome still depended on them. But, when expansion ground to a halt, Rome’s supplies and slaves began to dry…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ancient Rome, patricians were known to be the ruling class of the society, while plebians were the peasants or commoners without opportunities to move upward on the social ladder. The lack of social mobility in Ancient Rome poses a comparison against modern time United States. One of the very core foundations of the U.S. is that citizens are encouraged to pursue the American dream. People still hold true the promise of the better life by achieving education attainment…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The working lives of slaves were depended on their owner's economical power. A rich citizen could have lots of slaves and gave them different jobs to do. But citizens who weren't so rich could have one or two slave and because of this, those slaves had to do all the jobs. Slaves used in mines and galleys as labor. They also sold to gladiatorial schools and they might live longer than the formers. There were farm slaves too who were under the authority of bailiffs who were managing the farms. The other type of slavery was household slavery. Slaves of elite families in Roma could benefit from the greatest standard of living. That kind of slaves could enjoy food, clothing and living spaces of significantly lower quality then free members of the family. There was a big difference between farm slaves and household slaves; household slaves had more comfortable life than farm…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    World Empires

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Between 200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E. The Roman Empire ruled with an iron fist controlling mostly and if not all of the Mediterranean. This was due to two main factors, these are it military power and the political system it was able to develop. However most of the Romans accomplishment didn’t happen as an empire, but a republic. While as a republic, Romans created a political system that heavily influenced many to move to the Rome. In the article Ways of the World by Robert W. Strayer he states that the political system created “a written code of law offered plebeians (the poor class) some protection from abuse” from the upper or elite classes. Also this provided a better “system of public assemblies [that] provided an opportunity for lower classes to shape public policy and a new office of tribune” that would represent them in these assemblies. This was a huge part of Rome popularity and its growing number. This was the first time were the poorer classes had any kind of support from a political system. The Romans had get deal of pride with their newly developed system that benefited everyone. They also believed that the political system gave them a “greater freedom than did many of their more autocratic neighbors.”…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays