The original research article titled “General practitioners’ patient-centredness and responses to patients’ emotional cues and concerns: relationships with perceived empathy in areas of high and low socioeconomic deprivation” by Jenna-Marie Lundy et al,tries to find out how differently do patients perceive emotional cues and compassion based on their socio economic status. This study was performed in Scotland in areas with different levels of deprivation. 112 consultations were videotaped by eight different general practitioners who had low and high empathy rated by the patients using the Consultation and Relational Empathy measure. These video tapes were then later analyzed and objective assessment was made using the Measure of Patient-Centredness . Three components of the Measure of Patient-Centredness are exploring disease and illness experience, understanding the whole person and finding common ground. The results showed that general practitioners rated as more empathetic were more patient-centred. In settings with high deprivation, empathy was related more to finding “common ground”, whereas in low deprivation areas it was more about understanding the whole person. The general practitioners also reacted differently to emotional cues between low and high socioeconomic settings. By the results, it is obvious that patients judge their general practitioners differently based on their socioeconomic status which goes to imply that doctors should direct their care in a way that is desired and received better by people of that socioeconomic status to make their care more effective and helpful to the
The original research article titled “General practitioners’ patient-centredness and responses to patients’ emotional cues and concerns: relationships with perceived empathy in areas of high and low socioeconomic deprivation” by Jenna-Marie Lundy et al,tries to find out how differently do patients perceive emotional cues and compassion based on their socio economic status. This study was performed in Scotland in areas with different levels of deprivation. 112 consultations were videotaped by eight different general practitioners who had low and high empathy rated by the patients using the Consultation and Relational Empathy measure. These video tapes were then later analyzed and objective assessment was made using the Measure of Patient-Centredness . Three components of the Measure of Patient-Centredness are exploring disease and illness experience, understanding the whole person and finding common ground. The results showed that general practitioners rated as more empathetic were more patient-centred. In settings with high deprivation, empathy was related more to finding “common ground”, whereas in low deprivation areas it was more about understanding the whole person. The general practitioners also reacted differently to emotional cues between low and high socioeconomic settings. By the results, it is obvious that patients judge their general practitioners differently based on their socioeconomic status which goes to imply that doctors should direct their care in a way that is desired and received better by people of that socioeconomic status to make their care more effective and helpful to the