Preview

Pastoral and Nomadic vs. Urban-Based Societies

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
959 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pastoral and Nomadic vs. Urban-Based Societies
Pastoral and Nomadic VS Urban-based societies
The earliest societies of humans came in two basic types: pastoral and nomadic societies and urban-based river civilizations. Between these two types of society, there were large differences in economic development, political structure, and even to some extent gender relations. The fates of these two types of societies were also very different. The nomadic society began hundreds of thousands of years ago and still consists of the same fundamental lifestyle, but the urban civilizations, which came relatively recently, rapidly outpaced these nomadic societies. In addition, people in pastoral societies used to look down upon urban life as too luxurious, while people in urban societies thought pastoral societies were dirty and rough. Altogether, urban-based civilizations differed greatly from pastoral and nomadic societies. Economic development was a major difference between urban people and nomadic, pastoral people. One of the reasons that urban civilizations are the main players in most of the important events of history is that by their nature, these civilizations encourage economic development. Take, for example, early Mesopotamians. Like most early urban societies, they developed economically very quickly. They were quick to invent writing, in the form of cuneiform, to build markets where craftsmen sold their goods, and to establish important trade routes to other urban-based river civilizations, such as Egypt and the Indus Valley people, which enabled a sharing of ideas, and ultimately, further development. On the other hand, nomadic pastoral societies did not advance much economically; they did not make any significant progress throughout the centuries. This is demonstrated by the Native American tribes who lived by hunting and gathering, and who were leading very different lives from the Europeans who found them in the Age of Exploration. Thus, economic development was a major difference between urban-based river

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the beginning of time there were mainly small towns and villages. But, as technology, discoveries, and advancements were made; cultures began to grow into something more. The Mesopotamia was just one of the many cultures that began to show many progressive changes. As Mesopotamia began to change from a culture to a civilization, they developed very central characteristics.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    less interaction between people. Cities were not set up like villages and there was no community…

    • 2365 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Unit 1&2 Foundations

    • 4308 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Each early civilization developed its own unique ways of life, but they all shared some common characteristics…

    • 4308 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. The nomadic hunting societies transformed in to agricultural settlements with the use of corn. The larger civilizations developed where there were more resources such as fields and water. They developed there because they had the aid of the resources to allow them to flourish. The settlements in the southwest were far more dry than the settlements in the north east.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia Dbq

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The ancient cultures of Mesopotamia and Egypt developed into successful civilizations because they effectively utilized their surroundings. Rivers being the main geographic feature that led to successful development. From there on they went on to make many innovations to their traditional technology and techniques. These ancient cultures were also able to develop effective ways of governing their civilizations. Religion through cultural diffusion, brought together the city-states and empires created in Mesopotamia and Egypt. This essay will provide the facts that support the success of these ancient cultures.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Indus Valley civilizations all had their own components in order to keep their society prosperous. Mesopotamians were unified under the priest, the religious figure of society, but then was passed on to the king, who took all the responsibilities of the kingdom. The Mesopotamian civilization also developed a social structure based on a person’s wealth and their contribution to society. In addition, they developed a complex set of laws that had multiple levels of punishments based on a person’s status in society; this was the Law Code of Hammurabi. With all these components, Mesopotamia summed up to be a well organized and powerful civilization. The Egyptian civilization was also unified under one powerful and religious figure, the pharaoh. Egyptian society was far less complex when compared to the Mesopotamians; Egyptians did not have a class division or a system of laws. Egyptian women also had freedom in society then Mesopotamian women. With these lenient components, people in the society most likely are more loyal to their superior. While the Indus Valley civilization weren’t unified under one leader, the society did prosper in their technology and their construction. Buildings were constructed with mud bricks along with organized street systems that resemble modern day streets. The Indus Valley civilization also developed a complex writing system, still un-deciphered today. With their great advances in technology, the Indus Valley civilization was truly a prosperous one out of the three others, but they did not have the uniformity like the other…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The homo sapiens were able settle in one area until the soil could no longer sustain the plants and animal this made the domestication of plants and animals possible; the agriculture era was underway. The homo sapiens became Nomadic pastoralist moving their animals and plants and settlements to different areas with horses as resources would exhaust: transhumant herders kept their settlement in one area while moving their animals around. The earth drying made irrigation necessary to water plants and animals in some highland areas, others that lived close to water learned to fish and hand water their plants using pottery they made. All this agricultural growth led to trading and wealth status. Organized villages began to develop people started to perfect crafts such as farming, basket weaving and fishing; this led to changes in roles of men and woman with males being more dominate. Men would tend to the animals and plow fields while woman would harvest crops and prepare food. The changing of the climate had a huge impact on evolution and agriculture then and still has an impact…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jared Diamond considered Paleolithic Era to the Neolithic Era to be “The worst mistake in the history of the human race. He made some eye opening statements and realization based on life expectancy, health, and quality of life. In my opinion, this needed change was a good decision no matter the downsides. The Nomad did not want to sacrifice the innocent lives of their people as their population increased slowly. Their discovery of agricultural skills made a sufficient compromise for them to support themselves. Jared Diamond mentions repeatedly about the significant health changes as a cause of the conversion but in my opinion, the changes were something that the peoples may or may not…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ Ancient Civilizations

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the beginning of human existence, nomadism was the main form of living in order to survive. Many of our early civilizations started out with a group of people gathering and hunting their food, never staying in one place because their food always moved. That is until the Neolithic revolution, the domestication of plants and animals, which really started the chain reaction of civilization. Because of the start of Mesopotamia, Ancient Egypt, and The Indus Valley, many of the ideas these ancient peoples created had contributed to the growth of human knowledge up to this day.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mesopotamia Vs Egypt

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mesopotamian society was set up as city-states, where farming villages were connected to an urban are, ruled by a leader living in a palace in the city. This decentralized government is in sharp contrast with the centralized and divine leadership of the Egyptian ruler. The villages in Mesopotamia provided produce, and the urban area provided military protection and specialized goods. There were many city-states in Mesopotamia. The city-states often fought for control of resourses, but they also came together when large man power was needed as in building new irrigation systems. The geography of both Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilization helped to develop the religion, the political and economic environment of two great early civilizations. Mesopotamian civilization was comprised of city-states. Their society was divided into landowners, farmers/artisans/and slaves. With the importance of farming, the role of women diminished, since the men did the hard labor of plowing. Women were still allowed to own land at the time. The writing system in Mesopotamia, cuneiform, was controlled by male scribes. This dominance probably led to a further decline in the role of women in Mesopotamian society. Women were allowed to engage in trade, work outside their homes, and make baskets and clean their homes. Politics was off limits.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Think about early prehistoric times for humans - a primitive society not an industrialized society.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP World History

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What truly enables civilization to develop is the need for great natural resources, what I find that both Mesopotamia and Egypt had in common was they were close to the water. This helped and benefited them in a lot of ways. A water source helped them form irrigation systems so they could grow their own food and make a profit from it. Water and the rivers were also a means of traveling. If it were not for the water source close to both civilizations they would not have been able to get around the world for trade.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sumerian Civilization

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Way before civilizations were formed, people were nomadic. The Merriam- Webster Dictionary (2015) defines nomadic as “roaming about from place to place.” With the discovery of farming and pastoralism, nomadic ways of the people then slowly disappeared. Ever since this semester started, Ma’am Velarde has been reiterating that farming was the reason why civilizations appeared. Through farming, the people then learned to settle in one area, specifically near a body of water. They did not need to transfer to one place to another because they already had their food within the area. Fruits and vegetables were within their reach. “The arrival, now, of the town or city marked a great change in the way people lived, and it is important to understand…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia was the first great civilization and was built along the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers and is now located in present day Iraq. This is the area that is called the Fertile Crescent because its geography and layout caused farming and urban areas. The people in this region were either considered Sumerians or Semitics which led to religion in which the people worshipped gods of nature and also imagined gods as anthropomorphic. The social structure of Mesopotamia was organized in social divisions which gave certain economic and political advantages to some and condemned others. Social structure was very much controlled by The Law Code of Hammurabi which gave the society three classes; the free landowning class, the class of dependant farmers, and the class of slaves. The economy of Mesopotamia was based on slaves and trade. The trading was kept track with a system of tokens which gave ownership of different items and also property. Much of the trade there was done by boat and includes the trading of bronze, clay, and cattle. This is very much how Mesopotamia lasted so long and is known as the first great civilization.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During earlier hunter-gatherer societies all members of a group aided in the acquisition of food, but now that crops and livestock were being farmed there was opportunity to work in other industries. Both the Mesopotamian and Egyptian societies developed bronze and iron works. In Mesopotamia the creation of the wheel lead to easier travel and thus expanded trade. The Egyptians achieved similar transportation success in their use of boats.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays