Preview

Participants in Criminal and Civil Courtrooms

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
353 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Participants in Criminal and Civil Courtrooms
Participants in Criminal and Civil Courtrooms

Type of Participant Criminal Court Civil Court Remarks
Judge The judge is referred to as "the trier of law" he/she sits as an impartial party whose responsibility is to determine that the trial is conducted in an orderly and lawful manner. The judge resolves any disputes concerning points of law. The judge may grant a wider latutude to attorneys in their respective representation and defense of clients. The role of the judge is quite similar to that of the criminal counter part. The judge serves as the finial authority. In this case the judge has the same role. To make sure that the case is going in a smooth manner and that both parties get what they deserve.
Jury Referred to as the "Trier of fact". Created with the intent to afford the accused a fair and unbiased trail by a jury of peers. The responsibilites are the same as in the criminal court.
Although in some civil cases no jury is present, but the jury is there for both courts to help determine wether or not the person is guilty or not.
Prosecuter Respresent the citizens of the state or commonwealth.
Defence Attorney The DA is responsible for representing their clients to the fullest extent of their abilities or capabilities.
Witness The role of the witness is to present first hand knowledge of facts to the jury for consideration. The responsibilities are the same as in the crinminal court.
Defendant The defendant is presumed innocent unitil proven guilty and need not offer testimony in their defense. The persons or corporate entities that are being accused of the wrong doing or injurious behavior that are referred to in civil cases. The defendant is always innocent until proven guilty. This is why there are cases to help determine this factor.
Plaintiff Civil cases are initiated by individual or a corporation who have suffered some injury or wrong.
Attorneys Attempt to gain a strategic advantage by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    As for the Judges they decide if there is enough probable evidence to proceed with the case. Finally, the defense attorneys make arguments that certain evidence and certain individuals should be kept out of the criminal trial. I personally believe that the Judge has the most important role during Pre-Trail hearing because they have the final say on what can and will happen…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ring Vs Arizona Case Study

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "It must be a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt." (515 S Ct. 506 (1995)…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Checkpoint #6 Cjs/200

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First I will start off with the one who has all the authority, the judge. The judge is the one who makes all the rules. Next is the prosecuting attorney. The prosecuting attorney may also be known as the district attorney, state’s attorney, county attorney, commonwealth attorney or solicitor. The prosecuting attorneys duty is to conduct criminal proceedings on the behalf of the state or the people against those accused. The three main roles of the prosecutor are investigating crimes, to decide whether or not to instigate legal proceedings and to appear in court. All of the duties of a prosecutor may become too much for one person to handle so they supervise a staff of assistant district attorneys who do most of the work in the courtroom. The prosecuting attorney determines which cases to pursue by the amount of evidence that they gather. If the attorney cannot find enough evidence to get a conviction then they may make the decision to drop the case. Next is the defense attorney. The defense attorney is the one who represents the one being accused of a crime. Public defenders also represents those accused of crimes, however they are state employed lawyers.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CJUS 330

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Judges: in state courts they are elected by the voters. Federal judges are nominated by the president. Judges are the ultimate authority figures in the courthouse. Only they can set bail, instruct jurors, and impose sentences.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Judge and lawgiver, magistrates for some cases such as adoption, marriage and public roads.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial – power to interpret laws, determine meaning of laws, and to settle disputes that arise within the society…

    • 1100 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    had a chance to get acquitted. By not allowing the evidence the judge took away any chance that…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In The United States criminal justice system the informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officeris called a courtroom work group. The courtroom workgroup was proposed by Eisenstein and Jacob in 1977 to explain their observations of the ways courts, especially lower level courts, actually come to decisions. This foundational concept in the academic discipline of criminal justice identifies the seemingly opposing courtroom participants as collaborators in "doing justice."…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People can sue each other for money but can’t put each other in jail, only the state has the right too.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gideon V Wainwright Case

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They advise the clients of their rights, explains what can happen for each step of the criminal procedure and help ensure their client’s rights are not violated. The defense attorney must be knowledgeable and competent through all phases while failure in this can have disastrous consequences for the attorney and the defendant. The attorney will help with plea bargains arrangements, decide what is going to be the best course of action to defend the charges or help negotiate a guilty plea punishment. The defense attorney’s position does not end with the completion of the criminal trial. They will also be needed for the trial’s punishment phase, and any appeals process or parole hearings. The attorney must be able to develop a meaningful relationship with the client in order to provide the proper defense counsel. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the “effective assistance of counsel” for criminal defendants.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United State’s Criminal Justice system allows people to be put to a fair trial within a court of law. This means that everyone has the right to be tried for the crimes that he or she is being charged with and has the right to an unbiased trial. Though everyone has this right, many people do not know how the trial process works, or do not know what the courtroom personnel do. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the major personnel of the courtroom work and the rolls and responsibilities of each person.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The responsibilities of a judge in the criminal justice process consist of a variety of duties; no court judge have just one duty or job to complete on a daily bases. Some of these duties include determining probable cause, signing warrants, informing suspects of their rights, setting and revoking bail, arraigning defendants, and accepting guilty pleas. When a judge is not in court, most of the time, they are negotiating dispositions with prosecutors and defense attorneys. The most important responsibility is to ensure suspects and defendants are treated fairly in compliance with Due Process of Law. In a jury trial the judge is responsible for allowing the jury a fair chance to reach a verdict. Before releasing them to deliberate or discuss…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    to guard against jury nullification or what may be characterized as a perverse acquittal, jury…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many parts of the courtroom work group professionals who successfully pursuit justice and the process of convicting a criminal. The courtroom work group has a major role in convicting and finalizing a case. In the courtroom work group, there are three groups of people that hold the entire courtroom together. Without the work group, the courtroom would not flow, and coming to a conclusion to the case would not be as easy. The work group is made up of the Judge, the Defense Attorney, Public Defender, Court Recorders, and the Prosecutor Attorney. Which all are part of the courtroom work group which they work together to reach a decision, in the case by interacting among themselves and who’s involved an implicit recognition and rule of civility, cooperation, and sharing their goals. There are many roles in the work group, and if they are not all followed through with then the results could be different than what they should be. In this paper, we will look at the roles of the prosecutor, how the criminal justice funnel effects the courtroom work group and what will help eliminate the funnel and reduce the backlog of cases.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it comes to the evidence presented in court the judge and barrister have the role of making sure that the jury is able to follow the evidence. Another similarity between judges and barristers is that they both receive a salary unlike magistrates.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics