Preview

Participants’ Responsibilities in Clinical Research

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
340 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Participants’ Responsibilities in Clinical Research
Discussions of the ethics and regulation of clinical research have a great deal to say about the responsibilities of investigators, sponsors, research institutions, and institutional review boards, but very little about the responsibilities of research participants. In this article, we discuss the responsibilities of participants in clinical research. We argue that competent, adult participants are responsible for complying with study requirements and fulfilling other obligations they undertake when they make an informed choice to enroll in a study. These responsibilities are based on duties related to promise-keeping, avoiding harm to one’s self or others, beneficence, and reciprocity. Investigators and research staff should inform participants about their responsibilities during the consent process and should stress the importance of fulfilling study requirements. They should address any impediments to compliance and they may provide participants with financial incentives for meeting study requirements. In very rare cases, coercive measures may be justified to prevent immanent harm to others resulting from non-compliance with study requirements.
Key words: clinical research, ethics, participants, responsibilities, compliance
Introduction
Discussions of the ethics and regulation of clinical research have a great deal to say about the responsibilities of investigators, sponsors, research institutions, and institutional review boards (IRBs), but very little about the responsibilities of research participants. Investigators are responsible for protecting the rights and welfare of participants, for designing, executing and managing the study, for ensuring the integrity of the data, and for reporting adverse events and unanticipated problems. Sponsors are responsible for providing investigators with financial support, designing the study (except for investigator-initiated research), preparing regulatory and legal documents, monitoring and auditing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Is3350 Unit 1 Assignment

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Ethical consideration must be high on the agenda in public health since epidemiological findings are socially relevant, often publically funded and the research is conducted on human subjects. As discussed previously, there are two broad types of studies in epidemiology; the observational studies which include the cross-sectional, case-control and cohort studies and the experimental study or randomized clinical trial. As a policy writer and programme designer, I am obligated to ensure that investigators and researchers obtain informed consent from their subjects, where possible, and that there is privacy and…

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    CONSORT1 Task 3

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The author mentions that this study was approved by the “National Health Service South-West 3 Research Ethics Committee (10/H0106/13)” (Betts et al, 2014). This study meets the conduct and procedures that were set by the Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guideline. Diagrams, flow charts, and descripted details and rational for that aligns with the CONSORT guidelines can be obtained online.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical research studies disease in patients and how they are affected by these illnesses. However, consent is always required whether or not treatment is administered. Patients should always be kept informed of the changes in their condition and the treatment they are receiving. Sadly, this was not the case for the Tuskegee study on Syphilis in African American.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a clinical research nurse, it is my responsibility to ensure that all of my patients (or subjects) submit a signed and dated informed consent (IC) form prior to enrollment in a study. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires that all clinical trials or study sponsors (pharmaceutical manufacturer of the study drug) maintain proof of IC for each subject, in every trial, without exception in their respective trial master file (TMF). Potential barriers for participants in clinical research studies might be patients or subjects who are uneducated, and or, patients who are not able to assure his or her health care provider that they fully understand information that is provided, and IC may not be obtained. The NIH defines consent capacity as an "adult's ability to understand information relevant to making an informed, voluntary decision to participate in research." This information includes a description of the study, its potential risks and benefits, the right to give voluntary consent, the right to withdraw from the study, anonymity, confidentiality, and ways to lessen any risks. However, many people do not understand these components of an informed consent for a variety of reasons. These include people with "mental disorders, neurological disorders such as stroke or dementia, metabolic impairment,…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phase I Trail

    • 343 Words
    • 1 Page

    In order for investigators to gain legitimate consent to Phase I trial, they should first of all make sure they find healthy participants who are fit for the experiment. The investigators should be able and make sure that they explain the aim of the clinical trial to the participants, making sure that the subject has enough time to consider all options, answer all participant questions with honesty and truthfulness before any decision is made. The investigators should also make sure all information is well understood, the benefits and risk involved during this experiment. They should also make sure that everyone that accept to participate, should not be doing it for their own self-interest.…

    • 343 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tuskegee Study Inhumane

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Respect for persons means that researchers must obtain voluntary informed consent from participants in the study. Informed consent is achieved when participants are given accurate information about the potential risks and treatment options available. In addition, participants should be able to freely choose to begin or stop the study at any time.(1) The Tuskegee study did not fully disclose information to the participants. They told participants they were being treated for bad blood despite the fact that they were specifically studying the effects…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Currently, the Institutional Review Board (IRB) requires informed consent from participants in any research study (p. 50, 42). Although the IRB did not exist until the 1970s, after the conclusion of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, there were certainly laws and measures put in place to prevent mistreatment of research participants that came about during the near half-century duration of the experiment. As stated previously, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study began with 600 black men. The researchers chose an impoverished town with the understanding that these men would be willing to participate and also not have the background to recognize or resist any unreliable factors in the study. The men of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study were deceived about the…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While it might be understandable to prioritize the presence of health-care workers in experimental treatments, since they putted themselves at risk while caring for patients and could continue looking out for patients after recovering, this breaks the scientific validity and fair selection of study population ethical principles for trials of experimental treatments. If imported cases or infected health-care workers become participants of experimental treatments, they should be randomized just as any participant in order to control for confounding. This means that these participants could be part of the experimental intervention with supportive care or the placebo with supportive care. Another ethical issue that is raised with imported cases and infected health-care workers in experimental treatments is that it could be considered that these individuals are being exploited because they are…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research and Participants

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To keep a study ethical researchers must keep the identity of the participants confidential. The researcher must make sure the identities of the participants private to prevent any possible negative effects that may happen to them in the future. They must keep all personal information totally confidential even if it would make the conclusion; when it is published, better. This leads on to the fact that the researcher must be aware…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Advanced Directives

    • 3334 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Pullman, Daryl, Xikui, Wang (2001, February). Informed Consent and the Dynamics of Moral Responsibility. Adaptive Designs, Informed Consent, and the Ethics of Research, Retrieved June 2006, from http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~wangx1/CCT2001.pdf…

    • 3334 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Qualitative Study Nursing

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Fundamental to ethical research is respect for the autonomy of research participants. Autonomy refers to the right of an individual to make decisions about those things that affect them. In the context of research, participants should have the opportunity to make an informed decision about whether to participant in research or not. For consent to be valid it should be informed, it should be voluntary and the person giving consent should have the capacity to give that consent (Beauchamp and Childress,…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bedside Report In Nursing

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The NSW Health Human Research Ethics Committee CRGH Zone of the Sydney South West Area Health Services approved the study. Every patient and nurse were not identified but only labeled as Group 1, Group 2, patient 1, etc. The protection of the patient and nurses block their full identity. Participants in the study were given a written summary about the research that involved the objections and requirements before sighing the consent form, having the permission of individuals in the hospitals to be involved in the…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    social theory

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Research studies are supposed to guarantee be anonymity or at least confidentiality. Although this is what studies guarantee there is no law that protects it. When researchers don’t keep their word it leads participants feeling deceived and lied to.…

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ich Gcp » 5. Sponsor

    • 4570 Words
    • 19 Pages

    5.1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control 5.1.1 The sponsor is responsible for implementing and maintaining quality assurance and quality control systems with written SOPs to ensure that trials are conducted and data are generated, documented (recorded), and reported in compliance with the protocol, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s). 5.1.2 The sponsor is responsible for securing agreement from all involved parties to ensure direct access (see 1.21) to all trial related sites, source data/documents , and reports for the purpose of monitoring and auditing by the sponsor, and inspection by domestic and foreign regulatory authorities. 5.1.3 Quality control should be applied to each stage of data handling to ensure that all data are reliable and have been processed correctly. 5.1.4 Agreements, made by the sponsor with the investigator/institution and any other parties involved with the clinical trial, should be in writing, as part of the protocol or in a separate agreement. 5.2 Contract Research Organization (CRO) 5.2.1 A sponsor may transfer any or all of the sponsor’s trial-related duties and functions to a CRO, but the ultimate responsibility for the quality and integrity of the trial data always resides with the sponsor. The CRO should implement quality assurance and quality control. 5.2.2 Any trial-related duty and function that is transferred to and assumed by a CRO should be specified in writing. 5.2.3 Any trial-related duties and functions not specifically transferred to and assumed by a CRO are retained by the sponsor. 5.2.4 All references to a sponsor in this guideline also apply to a CRO to the extent that a CRO has assumed the trial related duties and functions of a sponsor. 5.3 Medical Expertise The sponsor should designate appropriately qualified medical personnel…

    • 4570 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    rights and well being of the participants must be weighed against the study's value to…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays