Preview

Parmenides Argument: The Way Of Opinion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
653 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Parmenides Argument: The Way Of Opinion
Parmenides' Argument

Parmenides was an ancient philosopher who developed the ideas of "The Way of Truth" and "The Way of Opinion." The thinker introduced his ideas through an epic poem in which he claims to have visited a goddess. The goddess lets him see the "heart of well rounded truth" and it is through this revelation that Parmenides acquires his philosophy. Parmenides' "Way of Truth" has been very influential among modern philosophers and has had a very big impact on the way we study philosophy today. The argument of "The Way of Truth" tells us that there are only three possibilities. Either "it is," "it is not," or "it is and it is not." This idea may be of great challenge to some but it, in a way, makes clear sense. The
…show more content…
This is because everything that we perceive "is." The conclusion of Parmenides' argument states that "it is." Since it is impossible for anyone to imagine the "it is not" nothing is "it is not." A prime example of this is the human idea of what is not. People believe that make believe characters such as Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy are the "it is not." According to Parmenides, these characters are in fact the "it is." This is because the human mind at one time had to have thought up these characters. We all think about these "nonexistent" characters at one time or another so they have to be the "it is." This is because Parmenides tells us that the "it is not" is unthinkable. We think about such "nonexistent" characters so they must be part of the "it is" group and they really do exist. The philosophy of "The Way of Truth" helped Parmenides to develop ideas about the world we live in. Since "it is," everything that exists does not experience change. He supports this theory by saying change requires there to be thought of the "it is not." This is because if something has gone through a change, what it once was has become the "it is not." Parmenides would not even consider what it once was, because he did not even believe in change. If something changes what it becomes what is not. Since "it is not" does not exist, nothing changes and everything is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Greek Civilization Dbq

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During Athens “Golden Age” philosophy started to take over. A philosopher is a person who offers views or theories on profound questions in ethics, metaphysics, and logic. They were also known as “lovers of wisdom”. Philosophers taught through questioning about life, family, friends, and religion. Socrates, a philosopher that came about during the birth of…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ 2 Ancient Greece

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates was the original philosopher. Socrates dies from headlock, he had the choice to live a lonely life with food and water or to take the poison and he picked the headlock, because He believed the search for truth would lead to proper conduct. “The unexamined life is not worth living”, that was the quote that Socrates believed by saying that the purpose of life was personal and spiritual growth. Considered the nature of beauty, knowledge and what is right. His method was to ask questions, to try to expose the flaws in his fellow Athenians' preconceived notions. Socrates went on to teach Plato, the next great Athenian philosopher.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHL 458 Week 1

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Truth is “the reality of the matter, as distinguished from what people wish so, believe to be son, or assert to be so” (Ruggiero, 2009). Truth is a fact. It does not change, only our knowledge change. Forming thoughts based on…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The truths are self evident, as we would follow them if there was no outside interference, it is a natural acceptance.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greek Civilization Dbq

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An important contributor to philosophy was Socrates (470 – 399 BC). “The unexamined life is not worth living.” This is a quote from Socrates. He believed that a person must ask questions and seek to understand the concept and ways of life (Doc. 1). He used a form of teaching that used a question and answer formation to force pupils to see things in their own eyes and understand it in their own mind with their own words that make sense to them. This was called the Socratic method, which is still used today. He was accused of corrupting the youth of Athens and a little while after was sentenced to death. During a big part of his life, Socrates examined his own ideas and tried to discover the truth behind many subjects, by reason and logic. His contributions were an extremely important part of the Western Civilization and his legacies were that we should think for ourselves and stand up for what we believe in. Another big contributor to Greek philosophy was Aristotle (384 – 322 BC). Many consider Aristotle to be a scientist rather than a philosopher because of his contributions to physics and biology. Aristotle was also a student of Plato but did not agree with a lot of his ideas. Aristotle…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the information that we learn about Socrates comes from the work and writings of one of his students, Plato. It has been alleged that the great Philosopher wrote nothing down for others to read, and as such, the knowledge and the teachings from Socrates that is relied upon to convey his philosophy and the epic story of his life comes not from himself, but his students who attempt to provide and accurate picture of the methods and philosophical beliefs held by their mentor and teacher.…

    • 2097 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Parmenides was of the Pre-Socratic times that focused on the offspring of philosophy, metaphysics. Parmenides philosophy relies heavily on reason, which influenced the thinking of Plato and Aristotle tremendously. A monist with such a radical metaphysical view on what is there and what is not, or what actually exists and what doesn’t. Understand and accept that Parmenides views are tenable yet also counterintuitive. His views open our eyes to knowing that the fundamental nature of reality has nothing in common with how we experience and interpret our world. I as well would disregard and agree with Parmenides on senses being very misleading because everyone’s senses are not the same as well as having such factors from the external environment can alter these as well. Focusing on reason to reveal the truth and genuine knowledge should only involve being. For example, when separating an object from its background, we can interpret the object as something, but we cannot do the same for the background. So we can look at the object as being “what is” and the background as “what is not” and…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes describes the results of his meditations when he reached the true knowledge and findings of the truth of his though. At the beginning of his investigation, Descartes undertakes to consider as false everything that he can possibly doubt. Descartes suggest that our sense experience, imagination, and will are all a part of the mind alone, and are not linked to the world.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes vs Hume

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    René Descartes realized that many of the things that he have accepted as the truth was false opinions, and consequentially the principles that were built upon them. He wanted to start anew by try to find out “the truth”, and then build upon that, because the foundation of science requires absolute certainty. In his attempt to find “the truth,” he started to criticize all of the things he had formally believed: applying the method of doubts, and then remove from the foundation what he found to be doubtable or deducible. He did this as he believed as his doubt increase, certainty decrease and vice versa. By the end of Meditation I, he was in a state called “Abyss,” where he was skeptical of all things and decided that the empirical world was presented to him by an evil demon He then reasoned that for him to be deceived by the demon, he must exist as something, a mind or a thinking thing…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato's Republic

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Plato's Republic, Socrates goes to great lengths to explain and differentiate between the ideas of opinion and knowledge. Throughout society, most common men are lovers of sights and sounds. "Lovers of sights and sounds like beautiful sounds, colors, shapes, and everything fashioned out of them, but their thought is unable to see and embrace the nature of the beautiful itself (Republic 476b)." The few who do recognize the beautiful itself are followers of the sight of truth, the philosophers.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He states that whether he is awake or asleep, “it remains true that two and three make five, and that a square has but four sides.” From his perspective, these truths are so evident that they could never fall under suspicion.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy refers to an organized system of thought (PK). In philosophy, wisdom is key. Some of the earliest Greek philosophers tried to find this wisdom on the basis of unifying principles (PK). Pythagoras, famous for the Pythagorean theorem, taught his students that answers and wisdom could be found in numbers and music. On the contrary, many did not agree with Pythagoras’ ideas. For example, the Sophists argued that humans were not able to understand the concept of the universe and people should work on improving themselves instead of speculating about such topics. The Sophists’ goal was to argue effectively through rhetoric, the art of persuasive speaking in debates and swaying an audience, not to promote a belief or idea (PK). Many of these debating techniques are still used today during all levels of government. Some modern day schools have debate clubs where teachers, much like the Sophists, teach pupils how to win a debate. However, there were doubts about Sophists as well. For example, Socrates, a sculptor with a love for philosophy, taught his pupils how to live by a code of ethics. Socrates believed that people could be happy if they lived moral lives, he taught this to his students by using the Socratic method. Socrates stated, “The unexamined life is not worth living” (Doc.1). This shows that the Socratic method uses a question-and-answer format to lead students to the answer. Socrates believed that all answers could be found inside. Only reasoning and critical examination is needed in order to call the answers forth. Many more philosophies were created during ancient Greece and they all contributed to Western civilization by giving modern day people philosophies and methods to answer…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “if you assign my book don’t censor it’’ published in Kernersville, N.C on November 28, 1999, Mark Mathabane argues the high school that assign his novel ‘’Kaffir Boy’’ should not censor chunks of his book that contributes to the meaning of the novel. This novel is about Mathabanes childhood, living in Africa during the during the apartheid period. There is mature scene and language in this novel that parents would disagree with, but all with reason and purpose. He argues that those parts censored teach lessons, not to take everyday things like food or freedom for granted, to utilize education as a tool to make our society better, and to always to have the urge make the right choices in life. Mathabane uses all three logos, pathos and ethos to support his claim; he also uses his personal experiences to contribute to his argument to not censor parts in his novel that serve a great importance and lesson.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scientific Method

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A young man by the name of Euthyphro involves himself in a conversation with the well known Socrates. During this conversation Euthyphro attempts to impose unrealistic beliefs concerning piety. Euthyphro is the plaintiff in a murder suit that he is filing against his very own father. Euthyphro believes that he has a case against his father, the reasons the young man comes up with does not sufficiently satisfy Socrates. This text is a great example of beliefs of a young man; against the wisdom and knowledge of older man. In the final analysis Socrates conversation with Euthyphro, smashes all of Euthyphro’s ideas and conceptions. Euthypro’s belief system has diminished and what he thought may be sound, good reasoning concerning the gods proves to be meaningless conversation. Euthyphro speaks in fallacy, Socrates sees right through it; and that is apparent in his questioning toward the young man. W. K. Clifford wrote an essay titled “The Ethics of Belief” in which he “argues that there is an ethic to belief that makes it always wrong for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence.” (Pojman/Rea 498) This short essay of comparing thoughts and beliefs will compare how Euthyphro by Plato, shows the importance of belief in comparison to that of W. K. Clifford in “The Ethics of Belief.” Furthermore, it is important to see how the text on Euthyphro’s conversation with Socrates, by Plato, truly shows that belief is invalid without proper evidence to justify it.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What does truth mean?

    • 929 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What does truth mean? Truth can mean many different things, to different people. I believe, that truth is what people accept as being correct when it can not be proven factually. "It is a relationship that holds that holds between a proposition and the corresponding fact"(Truth[Inernet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]). "According to, The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, truth is conformity to knowledge, fact, actuality, or logic." There are three major competing theories of truth. The three theories are pragmatic, correspondence, and coherence. The remainder of this paper will discuss all three of these theories, plus which theory seems to be the most defensible to me, and why.…

    • 929 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics