Parents Childs Liability Act
From birth to present day, everyone has grown up listening to the same word, “Responsibility.” Will we let our children forego the consequences of their actions? Even if we try the Parent Liability Childs Act will prevent parents from doing so. The Parent Liability Childs Act of 2000 in California states, “Parents jointly and severally liable for willful misconduct causing injury, death or property damage.” The Parent Liability Childs Act should be appealed because if the child isn’t punished they will commit more severe crimes, it is extremely unfair to poor or single parents, and the child may influence other children to do the same.
Naturally, if someone doesn’t know their mistake, then they won’t learn from it. As result, they would be more likely to repeat the same mistake, then thinking that’s the right thing they would advance on it and do more serious mistakes. If there isn’t a punishment the child won’t learn it’s wrong. As a famous philosopher once said, “To avoid repeating them, [the mistakes] we must learn from it.” The child would think such things are allowed since there is no consequence, a result of human nature. Even if the child knows it’s a mistake, they for a wrong doing won’t learn from the consequences because the parents will continue to enable them. Children’s brains are developing, if they won’t learn it’s wrong, they will proceed on the same path, and do much worse; such as murder, theft or robbery, or other forms of violence.
Next, the Parent Liability Childs Act is obviously biased against poor and single parents. First, single and poor parents have a tendency to a lower income. Instead of thinking this as a rich versus poor idea, try thinking of this as a perspective of a low-income parent. The disadvantaged parent won’t able to cover the cost as easily as a mere wealthy person, thereby the poor parent unequal punishment than a wealthy parent. The Constitution states that everyone that did the same crime must have the same
Naturally, if someone doesn’t know their mistake, then they won’t learn from it. As result, they would be more likely to repeat the same mistake, then thinking that’s the right thing they would advance on it and do more serious mistakes. If there isn’t a punishment the child won’t learn it’s wrong. As a famous philosopher once said, “To avoid repeating them, [the mistakes] we must learn from it.” The child would think such things are allowed since there is no consequence, a result of human nature. Even if the child knows it’s a mistake, they for a wrong doing won’t learn from the consequences because the parents will continue to enable them. Children’s brains are developing, if they won’t learn it’s wrong, they will proceed on the same path, and do much worse; such as murder, theft or robbery, or other forms of violence.
Next, the Parent Liability Childs Act is obviously biased against poor and single parents. First, single and poor parents have a tendency to a lower income. Instead of thinking this as a rich versus poor idea, try thinking of this as a perspective of a low-income parent. The disadvantaged parent won’t able to cover the cost as easily as a mere wealthy person, thereby the poor parent unequal punishment than a wealthy parent. The Constitution states that everyone that did the same crime must have the same