Parenting Style as Context: an Integrative Model

Topics: Parenting styles, Parenting, Developmental psychology Pages: 28 (9205 words) Published: August 25, 2013
Psychological Bulletin 1993. Vol. 113. No. 3, 487-496

Copyright 1993 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0033-2909/93/S3.00

Parenting Style as Context: An Integrative Model
Nancy Darling and Laurence Steinberg
Despite broad consensus about the effects of parenting practices on child development, many questions about the construct parenting style remain unanswered. Particularly pressing issues are the variability in the effects of parenting style as a function of the child's cultural background, the processes through which parenting style influences the child's development, and the operationalization of parenting style. Drawing on historical review, the authors present a model that integrates two traditions in socialization research, the study of specific parenting practices and the study of global parent characteristics. They propose that parenting style is best conceptualized as a context that moderates the influence of specific parenting practices on the child. It is argued that only by maintaining the distinction between parenting style and parenting practice can researchers address questions concerning socialization processes.

During the past 25 years, research based on Baumrind's conceptualization of parenting style has produced a remarkably consistent picture of the type of parenting conducive to the successful socialization of children into the dominant culture of the United States. Authoritativeness—a constellation of parent attributes that includes emotional support, high standards, appropriate autonomy granting, and clear, bidirectional communication—has been shown to help children and adolescents develop an instrumental competence characterized by the balancing of societal and individual needs and responsibilities. Among the indicators of instrumental competence are responsible independence, cooperation with adults and peers, psychosocial maturity, and academic success (for reviews, see Baumrind, 1989,199 la). This work on authoritativeness and its beneficial effects builds on half a century of research on parenting and parenting style. Yet, despite some impressive consistencies in the socialization literature, important questions remain unanswered. As researchers have expanded beyond samples of White, predominantly middle-class families, it has become increasingly clear that the influence of authoritativeness, as well as other styles of parenting, varies depending on the social milieu in which the family is embedded. For example, Baumrind (1972) reported that authoritarian parenting, which is associated with fearful, timid behavior and behavioral compliance among EuropeanAmerican children, is associated with assertiveness among African-American girls. Furthermore, recent studies in which the effects of authoritativeness have been compared across ethnic groups have consistently shown that authoritative parenting is most strongly associated with academic achievement among Nancy Darling and Laurence Steinberg, Department of Psychology, Temple University. Work on this article was supported by grants from the Lilly Endowment and the William T. Grant Foundation. Our thanks to Diana Baumrind, Marsha Weinraub, and several anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Laurence Steinberg, Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122.

European-American adolescents and is least effective in influencing the academic achievement of Asian- and AfricanAmerican youths (Dornbusch, Ritter, Leiderman, Roberts, & Fraleigh, 1987; Steinberg, Mounts, Lamborn, & Dornbusch, 1991). How can such variability be explained? Are the processes through which authoritativeness enhances development undermined by other processes operating in particular cultural milieus (e.g., within the child's peer group)? Or is there something fundamentally different about the processes that occur within authoritative families in different...

References: Baldwin, A. L. (1948). Socialization and the parent-child relationship. Child Development, 19,127-136. Baldwin, A. L. (1955). Behavior and development in childhood. New York: Dryden Press. Baumrind, D. (1965). Parental control and parental love. Children, 12, 230-234. Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative control on child behavior. Child Development, 37, 887-907. Baumrind, D. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75, 43-88. Baumrind, D. (1968). Authoritarian v. authoritative parental control. Adolescence, 3, 255-272. Baumrind, D. (1970). Socialization and instrumental competence in young children. Young Children, 26,104-119. Baumrind, D. (197 la). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monograph, 4 (1, Pt. 2). Baumrind, D. (197 Ib). Harmonious parents and their preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 4, 99-102. Baumrind, D. (1972). An exploratory study of socialization effects on Black children: some Black-White comparisons. Child Development, 43, 261-267. Baumrind, D. (1978). Parental disciplinary patterns and social competence in children. Youth and Society, 9, 239-276. Baumrind, D. (1980). New directions in socialization research. American Psychologist, 35, 639-652. Baumrind, D. (1983). Rejoinder to Lewis 's reinterpretation of parental firm control effects: Are authoritative families really harmonious? Psychological Bulletin, 94,132-142. Baumrind, D. (1989). Rearing competent children. In W Damon (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 349-378). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Baumrind, D. (1991a). Parenting styles and adolescent development. In J. Brooks-Gunn, R. Lerner, & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), The encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 746-758). New York: Garland. Baumrind, D. (1991 b). Types of middle-class adolescent substance users: Concurrent family and personality influences. Unpublished manuscript, Institute of Human Development, University of California, Berkeley. Baumrind, D, & Black, A. E. (1967). Socialization practices associated with dimensions of competence in preschool boys and girls. Child Development, 38, 291-327. Becker, W C. (1964). Consequences of different kinds of parental discipline. In M. L. Hoffman & L. W Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 1, pp. 169-208). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Belsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting: A process model. Child Development, 55, 83-96. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1958). Socialization and social class through time and space. In E. E. Maccoby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 400-425). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1961a). Some familial antecedents of responsibility and leadership in adolescents. In L. Petrullo & B. M. Bass (Eds.), Leadership and interpersonal behavior (pp. 239-271). New rk: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Conclusion
In 1954, Child wrote, "It is probable that the combined study of general parental characteristics and specific features of socialization as joint antecedent variables will be one of the important directions taken by future research" (p. 688). In our estimation, little about Child 's prescient statement warrants modification, nearly 4 decades after it was first written. Viewing parenting style as a context that facilitates or undermines
496
NANCY DARLING AND LAURENCE STEINBERG Schaefer, E. S. (1965). Children 's reports of parental behavior: An inventory. Child Development, 36, 413-424. Schaefer, E., & Bell, R. (1958). Development of a parental attitude research instrument. Child Development, 29, 339-361. Sears, R. R. (1957). Identification as a form of behavior development. In D. B. Harris(Ed-), The concept of development (pp. 149-161). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Sears, R. R., Maccoby, E., & Levin, H. (1957). Patterns of child rearing. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson. Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S., & Brown, B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47, 723-729. Steinberg, L., Elmen, J. D, & Mounts, N. S. (1989). Authoritative parenting, psychosocial maturity, and academic success among adolescents. Child Development, 60, 1424-1436. Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S., Dornbusch, S., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266-1281. Steinberg, L., Mounts, N. S., Lamborn, S. D., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment across varied ecological niches. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1,1936. Stevenson, D, & Baker, D. (1987). The family-school relation and the child 's school performance. Child Development, 58, 1348-1357. Symonds, P. M. (1939). The psychology of parent-child relationships. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Watson, J. B. (1928). Psychological care of infant and child. New York: Norton. Whiting, J. W M., & Child, I. L. (1953). Child training and personality: A cross-cultural study. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (196 Ib). The changing American child—A speculative analysis. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 7, 73-84. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1985). Freedom and discipline across the decades. In G. Becker, H. Becker, & L. Huber(Eds.), Sonderdrucke aus: OrdnungundUnordnung(pp. 326-339). Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany: Beltz Verlag, Weinheim, und Basel. Child, I. L. (1954). Socialization. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 655-692). Reading, MA: AddisonWesley. Cooper, C. (1988). Commentary: The role of conflict in adolescent parent relationships. In M. Gunnar (Ed.), 21st Minnesota symposium on child psychology (pp. 181-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Dornbusch, S. M., Ritter, P. L., Leiderman, P. H., Roberts, D. E, & Fraleigh, M. J. (1987). The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Development, 58,1244-1257. Freud, S. (193 3). New introductory lectures in psychoanalysis. New York: Norton. Kohn, M. L. (1969). Class and conformity: A study in values. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press. Lewis, C. C. (1981). The effects of parental firm control: A reinterpretation of the findings. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 547-563. Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & E. M. Hetherington (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (4th ed., pp. 1 -101) New York: Wiley. Orlansky, H. (1949). Infant care and personality. Psychological Bulletin, 46, 1-48. Parsons, T, & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press of Glencoe. Rogers, C. R. (1960). A therapist 's view of personal goals (Pendle Hill Pamphlet No. 108). Wallingford, PA: Pendle Hill. Schaefer, E. S. (1959). A circumplex model for maternal behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 226-235.
Received June 4,1991 Revision received July 21,1992 Accepted July 27,1992 •
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • parenting style Essay
  • Parenting Styles Essay
  • The Parenting Style Essay
  • Essay about Parenting Styles
  • Parenting Styles Essay
  • Parenting Styles Essay
  • Parenting Styles Essay
  • Parenting Styles Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free